1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Ronnie Earle Gets it Wrong or Just Doesn't Get It

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by carpro, Oct 1, 2005.

  1. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    [​IMG]

    You wouldn't be biased. Would ya now, Terry?

    Although it makes a lot of sense. Anyone in the pest control business just has to be deeply involved in graft and corruption. :rolleyes:
     
  2. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I didn't realize when I started this thread just how wrong earle actually got it.

    http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1.htm

    Earle Seeks Second Delay Indictment After Errors With First
    Tue Oct 04 2005 10:29:52 ET

    The AUSTIN AMERICAN-STATESMAN reports, Travis County prosecutors rushed Monday to fix problems with an indictment against DeLay by charging him "with the first-degree felony of money laundering.

    Last week a Travis County grand jury ended its term by indicting DeLay on a charge that accused him of conspiring to violate state campaign finance laws. The problem with that indictment, according to DeLay's lawyers, was that the conspiracy law did not apply to the election code in 2002.

    The Texas Legislature changed the law, which went into effect Sept. 1, 2003. That left Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle and his assistants presenting a complicated case to a group of grand jurors on their first day of meeting. Prosecutors hoped to fix the problem by reindicting DeLay on charges that he conspired to launder corporate money into political donations. In 2002, the conspiracy law applied to money laundering.

    Developing...


    [​IMG]
     
  3. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Um, he was admonished on three different occasions for unethical activity by the House Ethics Committee. You can't blame that on the Democrats.
     
  4. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Solution: Decentralize power and reduce Federal influence to roughly what it was in 1900. It would only absorb 7-10% of GNP and would greatly reduce corruption by removing incentives to those who incite the corruption.
     
  5. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    How many times has DeLay been admonished for his ethics issues? </font>[/QUOTE]Delay is as guilty as sin; the sooner we dump him the better. Hopefully there will be some prison time involved, but I doubt it.
     
  6. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Isn't it unethical (on the part of the DA) to be making a film about an ongoing case, or am I missing something?

    Also, I sure there is a logical explanation, but why was DeLay indicted in Travis County rather than Harris County?

    Thanks.
     
  7. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    7,727
    Likes Received:
    873
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Better be careful Terry! Statements as dogmatic as this have a tendency to come back and bite you on the butt sometime down the road. :rolleyes:

    I sure hope you don't practice this style of judgment with your students. :confused:
     
  8. Bro. James Reed

    Bro. James Reed New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2002
    Messages:
    2,992
    Likes Received:
    1
    To counterbalance Terry, I also live here and I believe that DeLay is innocent.

    Unlike Terry, who lives in the big, sinful city, us suburb folks, the type of people DeLay represents, believe he is innocent of the charges.

    From what has been reported of the charges, I really do not see how any group of people could have indicted anyone on these allegations.

    btw, after one indictment, it doesn't take much to get a second. A grand jury only has to see that there is a possibility of guilt. If another grand jury has indicted him on related charges (the 6th grand jury to hear them, mind you), then all Earle has to do is say that he has already been indicted on related charges, so the possibility of guilt has already been established. After the first one, the second one pretty much had to indict him, unless they were militant DeLay supporters.

    Since this issue involves a state official, that is the reason it is taking place in Travis, rather than Harris county.

    In Harris county, the charges would not have been brought, but even so, there would not have been an indictment.

    Travis county, encompassing Austin, is the most liberal county in the state.

    This whole thing has been a hot topic around the office since it happened. Even admitted liberals that I work with do not see how DeLay could be indicted on these charges. I have yet to hear someone who does, except for Terry.

    Those who do not like DeLay will probably assume guilt just because he gets his way most of the time in Congress.

    To be perfectly honest, I would love to see Sheila Jackson Lee be put in jail on similar charges, but that doesn't mean she is guilty of them. It just means I don't like her. :D

    I think Terry is in the same boat.
     
  9. hillclimber

    hillclimber New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would be inclined to give a fellow believer his day in court before rendering a verdict.
     
  10. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it's because these are state charges and the state capital is in Travis County. It is the only county Earle has jurisdiction in as he is the Travis County District Attorney. But you're from Texas so you already know that. :confused:
     
  11. hillclimber

    hillclimber New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    Um, he was admonished on three different occasions for unethical activity by the House Ethics Committee. You can't blame that on the Democrats. </font>[/QUOTE]Of course I can. They wouldn't have stopped at an admonishment were there anything at all to it. But I think I would change the word Democrats to leftist socialists.
     
  12. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    It also seems as though the the authority of the Public Integrity Unit belongs to the Travis County District Attorney's office rather than the Texas State Attorney General - although it has been proposed in 2004 by Republican Party of Texas Chairman Tina Benkiser to change that, I don't believe it has been changed yet (it probably will be now).

    Source: FreeRepublic.com (linkie, see 2nd story down)


    There are as many Republicans as Democrats on the committee and the vote was unanimous. What I should have said is that you can't correctly or fairly blame that on the Dems. If you don't care about being correct or fair, you can blame whomever you choose. *** shrug ***
     
  13. hillclimber

    hillclimber New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    There are as many Republicans as Democrats on the committee and the vote was unanimous. What I should have said is that you can't correctly or fairly blame that on the Dems. If you don't care about being correct or fair, you can blame whomever you choose. *** shrug *** </font>[/QUOTE]OK I see your point
     
Loading...