Robert Snow
New Member
As long as we can keep Hiswitness limited to responding to his own postings it is a step in the right direction.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sabbath
- Thread starter HisWitness
- Start date
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
You can call it mashed potatoes for all I care. It is not Baptist doctrine.
Dr Ach has proven time and again that you are wrong, yet you insist you are right.
Dr Ach knows Hebrew and has been teaching others the correct way to read and write it for some time now. And yet, you insist you know more than him.
For the student, (you) to attempt to teach the teacher (Dr Ach) is both presumptious and rude (thanks Willy Wonka*™)
Dr Ach has proven time and again that you are wrong, yet you insist you are right.
Dr Ach knows Hebrew and has been teaching others the correct way to read and write it for some time now. And yet, you insist you know more than him.
For the student, (you) to attempt to teach the teacher (Dr Ach) is both presumptious and rude (thanks Willy Wonka*™)
HisWitness
New Member
You can call it mashed potatoes for all I care. It is not Baptist doctrine.
Dr Ach has proven time and again that you are wrong, yet you insist you are right.
Dr Ach knows Hebrew and has been teaching others the correct way to read and write it for some time now. And yet, you insist you know more than him.
For the student, (you) to attempt to teach the teacher (Dr Ach) is both presumptious and rude (thanks Willy Wonka*™)
Not Baptist doctrine to believe in the Father and The Son ????
and he was FLAT proved wrong--with his self righteousness by saying NO BIBLE contains the name YAH--then I showed him from scripture and he still flatly denied it--so if I must learn under a self righteous teacher--when he is proven wrong very plainly--and he still refutes it--don't think I need to learn from someone like that :wavey::wavey::wavey:
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Not Baptist doctrine to believe in the Father and The Son ????
and he was FLAT proved wrong--with his self righteousness by saying NO BIBLE contains the name YAH--then I showed him from scripture and he still flatly denied it--so if I must learn under a self righteous teacher--when he is proven wrong very plainly--and he still refutes it--don't think I need to learn from someone like that :wavey::wavey::wavey:
The verse you quoted said Jah, not Yah you did not prove him wrong.
HisWitness
New Member
You are not a Baptist. Period.
does it hurt friend to know the truth !!!
HisWitness
New Member
The verse you quoted said Jah, not Yah you did not prove him wrong.
you are going to show your ignorance in willingly denying that the letter J was NOT in Hebrew ???
The name plainly is YAH and you know it :wavey::wavey::wavey:
JAH and YAH are one in the same
does it hurt friend to know the truth !!!
Your posts remind me of that other gal that just got banned recently.
HisWitness
New Member
As long as we can keep Hiswitness limited to responding to his own postings it is a step in the right direction.
are you afraid to here more truth friend !!!
TRUTH makes you free--don't be afraid of it :thumbs::thumbs:
HisWitness
New Member
Your posts remind me of that other gal that just got banned recently.
why all the hate for just saying the names of the Father and Son ??????
YAH and YESHUA ??? does those names offend you ????
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Your blatant disrespect for the name of Jesus offends us.
saturneptune
New Member
You can call it mashed potatoes for all I care. It is not Baptist doctrine.
Dr Ach has proven time and again that you are wrong, yet you insist you are right.
Dr Ach knows Hebrew and has been teaching others the correct way to read and write it for some time now. And yet, you insist you know more than him.
For the student, (you) to attempt to teach the teacher (Dr Ach) is both presumptious and rude (thanks Willy Wonka*™)
Instead of stating the fact that Jesus Christ is our Savior's name, and stating the fact it is a non issue, you resort to name calling, which does nothing but give legitimacy to the opposite side. Then you turn right around and cite a person for a source that was caught in blatant plagiarism.
saturneptune
New Member
Your posts remind me of that other gal that just got banned recently.
Believe it or not, that thought also crossed my mind.
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
I was not "name calling." thanks Willy Wonka is a thanks to the movie Willy Wonka for the quote I used prior to saying thanks.Instead of stating the fact that Jesus Christ is our Savior's name, and stating the fact it is a non issue, you resort to name calling, which does nothing but give legitimacy to the opposite side. Then you turn right around and cite a person for a source that was caught in blatant plagiarism.
Charlie Bucket's teacher tells Charlie at one point in the movie that it would be rude and presumptious for the student to attempt to teach the teacher.
Sorry for the confusion.
Last edited by a moderator:
DrJamesAch
New Member
Instead of stating the fact that Jesus Christ is our Savior's name, and stating the fact it is a non issue, you resort to name calling, which does nothing but give legitimacy to the opposite side. Then you turn right around and cite a person for a source that was caught in blatant plagiarism.
I have asked you several times to prove it, and you keep repeating the same thing over and over again. Just because you THINK that I plagiarized something does not eliminate what I know from a language that I have spoken since birth, nor anything else that I have spoken of. You have accused me of plagiarizing NUMEROUS posts, and have never shown your proof for it though asked several times.
And since you continue to throw this baseless accusation at me, then why don't you answer how you can be a Third Class Petty Officer in the Navy with an E-3 ranking.
Your practice of "any enemy of Ach is a friend of mine" attitude is pathetic in light of the doctrines that HW has spewed on this forum even Calvinists and Non Calvinists alike have vehemently disagreed with.
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Seems to be a norm with sn. He has had it in for me for some time so occasionally comes into a thread I am posting and falsely accuses me. As he did this morning and the other morning.I have asked you several times to prove it, and you keep repeating the same thing over and over again. Just because you THINK that I plagiarized something does not eliminate what I know from a language that I have spoken since birth, nor anything else that I have spoken of. You have accused me of plagiarizing NUMEROUS posts, and have never shown your proof for it though asked several times.
And since you continue to throw this baseless accusation at me, then why don't you answer how you can be a Third Class Petty Officer in the Navy with an E-3 ranking.
Your practice of "any enemy of Ach is a friend of mine" attitude is pathetic in light of the doctrines that HW has spewed on this forum even Calvinists and Non Calvinists alike have vehemently disagreed with.
DrJamesAch
New Member
Seems to be a norm with sn. He has had it in for me for some time so occasionally comes into a thread I am posting and falsely accuses me. As he did this morning and the other morning.
He did it again to me yesterday in a different way. I was an arguing against what's called a "loaded fallacy question" and one of the common examples of that analogy which can be found on wikipedia or any online dictionary is that of "have you stopped beating your wife". He took the statement and tried to make it look like I was deliberately disparaging someone's wife by taking the argument that most everyone on that thread was already familiar with, and taking it out of context to support his vendetta.
The fact that he has come to the defense of someone who has denied the deity of Christ, and virtually every fundamental doctrine of the Bible just for the sake of capitalizing on an opportunity to disparage me shows just what kind of cloth he is cut from. I really don't take him that seriously ever since he sent me a picture of a pig with the caption "what's for dinner" knowing that I am Jewish.
Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Typical hit and run, with no proof to substantiate his accusations.
And the picture of the pig? Totally tastless.
And the picture of the pig? Totally tastless.
DrJamesAch
New Member
Fred, name calling is name calling, and that is exactly what that post was. And yes, a plagiarism charge was proven against the other. It seems both of you are authors of confusion and dissention.
A bunch of disgruntled Calvinists that all agree with each other against a Non Calvinist that has vehemently opposed their belief system is not proof of an accusation.
But I would say even if the ridiculous plagiarism accusation were true, which is the most egregious, believers who support a man accused of "plagiarizing" ONE COMMENT in order to prove that Calvinist's were being dishonest in their debate tactics, or Calvinists defending and support a person who has clearly blasphemed the name of God and virtually every fundamental doctrine of the Bible that follows several cults such as Sacred Name, 7th Day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses?
Last edited by a moderator:
HisWitness
New Member
A bunch of disgruntled Calvinists that all agree with each other against a Non Calvinist that has vehemently opposed their belief system is not proof of an accusation.
But I would say even if the ridiculous plagiarism accusation were true, which is the most egregious, believers who support a man accused of "plagiarizing" ONE COMMENT in order to prove that Calvinist's were being dishonest in their debate tactics, or Calvinists defending and support a person who has clearly blasphemed the name of God and virtually every fundamental doctrine of the Bible that follows several cults such as Sacred Name, 7th Day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses?
don't try and put me in this--your just using me to try and hide behind to protect your own transgression friend :laugh::laugh::laugh: