Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This topic seems to be a bit vague.Originally posted by Petrel:
You all are OFF TOPIC.![]()
In my neck of the woods, an RC is a soft drink, short for Royal Crown Cola. Happens to be a favorite snack of many along with a Moon Pie, and a small bag of peanuts.Originally posted by SpyHunter:
Call me a dilettante, but what is RC?
So now who's stretching words?Technically, it is part of worship.
So now who's stretching words?Originally posted by Living_stone:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Technically, it is part of worship.
This topic seems to be a bit vague.Originally posted by BobRyan:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Petrel:
You all are OFF TOPIC.![]()
Our last few posts (or even pages) have:The problems are these:
1) The post is so lengthy that often the person doesn't know where to begin or doesnt have the time to adequately respond. - This doesn't mean the arguement is won or lost for either side...it's just dead.
2) The post has so many topics which could each be given pages and pages of debate, that by squeezing twenty of them into one post Person A forces Person B to give only a vague rebuttal to any given point, instead of being allowed to give the proper ammount of time to each subject.
3) The post has so many lengthy quotes that the person is force to wade through another bonus hour or ten of reading if one want's to get the context proper to the quotes given.
It's pretty simple. You just say "Blessed St. Peter, these Catholics think you can hear me. I don't. If you can and you can answer prayers, then pray for me to the Lord our God that I might know his will". Just saying that should solve your problem right there.I DO have a problem communicating with the dead.
It's pretty simple. You just say "Blessed St. Peter, these Catholics think you can hear me. I don't. If you can and you can answer prayers, then pray for me to the Lord our God that I might know his will". Just saying that should solve your problem right there.Originally posted by Living_stone:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />I DO have a problem communicating with the dead.
Do you believe in Investigative Judgement Bob? Because if you do there is certainly no Scripture to support such a claim. And the Saints aren't dead they are in heaven. And since the Church is universal and is in Heaven and on earth, me asking a Saint to pray for me is no more than you standing up in church and asking the "congregation" to pray about something. Except that a person in Heaven has no flesh to contend with.Originally posted by BobRyan:
Sadly for those inclined to pray TO the dead (to consult the dead on behalf of the living - and/or consult the dead on behalf of other dead saints -- God's prohibition against communion with the dead "stands"!
So, what Catholics do is no different than when I say to someone in church..."And the Saints aren't dead they are in heaven. And since the Church is universal and is in Heaven and on earth, me asking a Saint to pray for me is no more than you standing up in church and asking the "congregation" to pray about something."
That "prayer" comes straight from the pit of hell."Enraptured by the splendor of your heavenly beauty and impelled by the anxieties of the world, we cast ourselves into your arms, Oh Immaculate Mother of Jesus and our Mother
....we adore and praise the peerless richness of the sublime gifts with which God has filled you above every other mere creature, from the moment of conception until the day on which after your assumption into heaven, He crowned you Queen of the Universe.
Oh crystal fountain of
faith, bathe our hearts with your heavenly perfume.
Oh Conqueress of evil and death, inspire in us a deep horror of sin which makes the soul detestable to God and the slave of hell. Oh well-beloved of God, hear the ardent cries which rise up from every heart in this year dedicated to you.
Then tenderly, Oh Mary, cover our aching wound; convert the wicked, dry the tears of the afflicted and the oppressed. Comfort the poor and humble. Quench hatred,
sweeten harshness, safeguard the flower of purity and protect the Holy Church.
In your name resounding harmoniously in heaven, may they recognize that all are brothers...Receive, Oh sweet Mother our humble supplications and above all, obtain for us that on that day, happy with you, we may repeat before your throne that hymn which is sung today around your altars.
You are beautiful Oh Mary. You are Glory Oh Mary. You are the joy, you are the Honor of
our people."
– Pope Pius XII, celebration of the Marian Year in Rome, 1950"
It will prove only that:If you care to deny that what I just posted is the norm for Catholicism, just say so. I will link to a University of Dayton site that will document...with hundreds of RCC sponsored and many times Pope uttered...prayers to Mary that will prove that what I just said is 100% true.
That devotion is idolatry. As evidenced in the prayer quoted in the above post it is adoration, praise, and prayer to Mary. It is that which should only be directed to God. It is taking away from God and giving to Mary that which is due only to God, and yet Mary is not God. It is blasphemy.Originally posted by Living_stone:
It will prove only that:
A)Many Catholics, even prominante ones, have a devotion to our lady
Yes, most Baptists do. We read the KJV on a regular basis. Sometimes I even take a look at the 1611 edition of the KJV which you would have a problem reading. Many of us are far more acquainted with the Old English than you are. So this is no excuse.B)Many use language which seems outdated today
Dulia and latria are a convenient dichotomy of worship invented by the Catholic Church to distinguish between two levels of worship which don't really exist. Worship is worship even if in your mind you give one part of worship a different name so that you can excuse yourself and say it is not worship.C)You cannot distinguish yourself between praise (dulia) and worship (latria), which has been a distinction since the bible.
The RCC is.Nobody is worshipping Mary.
And as such she is a sinner saved by grace, just like my wife, and every other believer. If you are going to pray to Mary why not pray to my wife. Is she not good enough for you?Mary is a Creature. A magnificant creature
Yeah right! You have got to be joking!- the New Eve and Ark of the New Covenant,
That is not what the Bible says:the First Christian
You don't even have this right. There have been others throughout Bible history given that same blessing.and the Mother of our Lord, who from that day all generations have called blessed.
She is the model of a sinner, just like we all are. She is no better than Peter or Paul or any of the other disciples. They are all sinners. She is no better than Jael who also was called blessed above women. The fact is that she needed to be saved. She needed to put her faith in Jesus Christ herself in order to receive the gift of eternal life. She was no different than any other sinner. She even admitted that she was a sinner.She is the model of perfect Christianity - a divine submission to God and for that we greatly honor her.
Again look at the prayer in the above post, and with a straight and honest face please tell me that that is not worship. If you can say that, then I can say that you are lying. It is worship and adoration. It is veneration. It is something due only to God. It is taking away from God that which is due only to Him. In short, it is idolatry.You can continue to say "Catholis worship Mary" and be mistaken. She is a creature. She is not the Creator. No true Orthodox or Catholic person has ever mistaken that fact.
Certainly it is, and we give credit where credit is due. But so was the Apostle John, and many others. So was William Carey, Adoniram Judson, David Livingstone, and many other missionaries who have given their lives for Christ. I don't think that Mary should be set on a pedestal any more than any other Christian that was sold out for God, as the afore-mentioned were. She was a woman who in one point in history was chosen by God for a specific purpose (to bring Jesus into this world), and she accomplished that purpose. She is not the mother of God because of it.Originally posted by tragic_pizza:
DHK, I have to alost disagree with you on a point: yes, Mary was a sinner, as are we all, but she offers an example of submission to the Divine will which is hard to miss.
Not at all comfortable with all the "New Eve" and "New Ark" stuff, and I think the "first Christian" is arguable, since we do not know the historical facts on the matter, but I have to say that her willingness to give herself completely to God's will is definitely an example we should all attempt to emulate.
That makes it all the more resemble the original "Queen of Heaven", Semiramis, with husband Nimrod reborn as Tammuz.Yeah right! You have got to be joking!
Adam and Eve were married.
Christ is the new Adam; we know that from Scripture.
If Mary is the new Eve, then Mary is married to Christ Is that your belief? Are Mary and Christ married to each other?
Certainly it is, and we give credit where credit is due. But so was the Apostle John, and many others. So was William Carey, Adoniram Judson, David Livingstone, and many other missionaries who have given their lives for Christ. I don't think that Mary should be set on a pedestal any more than any other Christian that was sold out for God, as the afore-mentioned were. She was a woman who in one point in history was chosen by God for a specific purpose (to bring Jesus into this world), and she accomplished that purpose. She is not the mother of God because of it.Originally posted by DHK:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by tragic_pizza:
DHK, I have to alost disagree with you on a point: yes, Mary was a sinner, as are we all, but she offers an example of submission to the Divine will which is hard to miss.
Not at all comfortable with all the "New Eve" and "New Ark" stuff, and I think the "first Christian" is arguable, since we do not know the historical facts on the matter, but I have to say that her willingness to give herself completely to God's will is definitely an example we should all attempt to emulate.
That makes it all the more resemble the original "Queen of Heaven", Semiramis, with husband Nimrod reborn as Tammuz.Originally posted by Eric B:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Yeah right! You have got to be joking!
Adam and Eve were married.
Christ is the new Adam; we know that from Scripture.
If Mary is the new Eve, then Mary is married to Christ Is that your belief? Are Mary and Christ married to each other?
St. John - who no holier man lived - was not fit to unstrap Christ's sandal, but Mary taught Jesus to put them on. Meditate on that.She was a woman who in one point in history was chosen by God for a specific purpose (to bring Jesus into this world), and she accomplished that purpose. She is not the mother of God because of it.