Not one of the last 5 posts addressed the issue of Scripture. What does it say?
Rom 14:22-23.
Hypotheticals by the thouseands could be offered and questioned...what about this or that or the next thing?
This OP was not about a hypothetical situation. It is a real situation with real issues.
Only Keith admits that the line is difficult to determine. I submit it is not impossible. The lady who asked the question obviously has doubts about whether to go or not. I maintain that the existence of her doubts determine where the line is in this situation. "He that doubteth is damned if he eat (attends party) because he eateth (partieth) not of faith, for whatsoever is not of faith is sin."
There is no getting around this. There is no wiggle room, no hypotheticals. Now you may disagree. That is certainly your liberty to do so, but I contend you are putting a stumbling block before this dear sister.
In His service;
Jim
Rom 14:22-23.
Hypotheticals by the thouseands could be offered and questioned...what about this or that or the next thing?
This OP was not about a hypothetical situation. It is a real situation with real issues.
Only Keith admits that the line is difficult to determine. I submit it is not impossible. The lady who asked the question obviously has doubts about whether to go or not. I maintain that the existence of her doubts determine where the line is in this situation. "He that doubteth is damned if he eat (attends party) because he eateth (partieth) not of faith, for whatsoever is not of faith is sin."
There is no getting around this. There is no wiggle room, no hypotheticals. Now you may disagree. That is certainly your liberty to do so, but I contend you are putting a stumbling block before this dear sister.
In His service;
Jim