• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Should I Leave the Southern Baptist Convention?

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
I think even the most zealous 5-point Calvinists in the SBC will readily admit that they are not in the majority,
Correct. Only about 30% of SBC churches identify as Calvinist.

But I have to wonder how many people will say, as I do, that I am not a Calvinist, I am a Particular Baptist. :)
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Correct. Only about 30% of SBC churches identify as Calvinist.

But I have to wonder how many people will say, as I do, that I am not a Calvinist, I am a Particular Baptist. :)

The average church member does not even know what that moniker even means.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
The average church member is probably a modalist and doesn't know what that moniker means.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
The average church member is probably a modalist and doesn't know what that moniker means.
The average church member would say they are Trinitarian but if asked to describe the Godhead they would probably be stumped. Most pastors would probably have a problem articulating the hypostases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsr

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
I would agree, Doc, but I'm not sure the majority of church members would identify as Trinitarian unless it was included in a multiple-choice question that included obviously false answers.
 

Billx

Member
Site Supporter
It is true. I have seen persons excluded from new membship because
They did not profess ES. Because they did not understand grace.
The convention thought was quite ridged. Things are a little better now.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
I don't think that came from the convention; it was what the churches believed was proper. (This is a separate issue from recent decisions by the mission boards to reject candidates whose baptisms were by non-ES groups).

In the church I grew up in, our longtime piano player had to be baptized before she could become a member because her original baptism (by immersion) was in a Pentecostal (Wesleyan in soteriology) church. No one from the convention forced the baptism; it was just accepted within the church that it was the way things should be.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Correct. Only about 30% of SBC churches identify as Calvinist.

In my part of the world I would venture that the percentage is much, much lower and would not include any of the larger churches. For years I attended a large church whose pastor was decidedly anti-Calvinistic. The only ones I know of locally are small, and there aren't many of them.

But I have to wonder how many people will say, as I do, that I am not a Calvinist, I am a Particular Baptist. :)

Probably about the same as would understand me if I said I leaned toward being a Reformed Baptist. Not that I would, of course. Too much to explain with no real benefit. The folks love the Lord and want to do his work.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have a few reasons to leave the SBC now, but I wanted to discuss with you guys and my church leaders whether I should stay or not. Here are my current reasons for wanting to leave, which may expand honestly:

1. The denomination is too "big tent." I now believe that doctrine and moral teaching is of extremely high importance. A significant minority, if not a majority at times, of Southern Baptist churches teach or enforce things I could in no way support. (Charismaticism, a kind of evangelical "modern" womanhood, birth control, church discipline in only extreme circumstances, embrace of the nuclear family over and against the extended family, a turning away from the bible as the rock of all we believe in, a poor understanding of when or when not to go to war, an odd style of American nationalism, ecumenism, health and wealth over charity, and even socially liberal politics).

While many of these are rare problems, 2 John 9-11 warns us that we are not to even welcome false teachers, let alone go to church with them! Also, some of these are trends in the denomination that I am concerned will win out in the near to mid future. Or, as is the case with church discipline, they are broad problems with determined minorities fighting for a biblical position.

2. The denomination was founded Calvinistic with heavy attention to the Doctrines of Grace. I am Arminian, and honestly coming to arguments with people at church or in the conference about this issue seems foolish to me, since the denomination is most true to its roots when it allies with people, who do not believe as I do.

3. Of all the church leaders of church history, I most identify with Menno Simons, so I view myself as a Baptist who is ultimately descended from the Mennonites and their teachings. Teachings that are heavily altered in some cases to better conform with a literal interpretation of the bible. I do not identify myself with the Reformation and its theology all that much over and against the Mennonites. Here again the SBC doesn't seem to fit given its more Reformed roots.

Thanks in advance for any comments!

Yes you should, you are not SBC material.
 

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The SBC is about doing missions. With all the other focus you have you seem to have lost site of that.

To an extent that is very true. I have certainly lost sight of personal evangelism recently, but I am very involved in missions in a few ways. The problem has been what to tell people when I witness to them because many in my area (Orlando, FL) are 7th day Adventist, Mormon, Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox, United Methodist, or Episcopal. I am now certain that the false Jesus these organizations spread is non-salvific. Yet even when I run into other baptists, and I'll specify from my age group, who are the most common, I am constantly amazed at their loose lifestyles compared to the bible's commands.

I guess what I'm making sense of as I type, and thank you for the correction, is that it seems like most "Christians" I meet in Orlando, FL are in need of someone telling them only the Jesus of the bible saves. They also need to be told that the worries of this world, the allure of wealth, and the desire for other things are deadly dangerous. I need to get past my cowardice, I see, and just say the true but hated thing with nearly everyone I meet in evangelism.

Thank you for the correction. But I must disagree on international missions to an extent. The last thing I want to inflict on anyone overseas is a false Jesus, and there are now a seemingly growing part of the convention that have a more Moderate, Ecumenical. or even Charismatic Jesus in mind than the real one.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Missions is the reason the SBC was formed
the cooperative program is all about missions

Precisely. As W.A. Criswell said, it's what holds Southern Baptists together together like cables of steel; the SBC would be a weak rope of sand otherwise:

SBC President W.A. Criswell at the denomination's 125th Anniversary Annual Meeting in 1970

"Criswell told Southern Baptists 'if ever we lose that missionary passion we shall dissolve like a rope of sand.' He explained it this way: 'Our world-wide mission program holds us together like cables of steel.'"
 
Top