Not required, but would be very helpful!Then why suggest that is part of God’s qualifications for pastors.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not required, but would be very helpful!Then why suggest that is part of God’s qualifications for pastors.
think we would agree that while God not expecting all pastors to now become next Dr Wallace or AT Robinson, would profit all of them to have at least a working knowledge of Greek and Hebrew in order to effectively use study tools!Original language study is not about retranslating an English translation of the Bible.
I affirm the value of studying them.
What's wrong is the misuse of such knowledge. But that isn't exclusive to original languages either. All education can be abused.
Also, this is not always about higher degrees. One can study the original languages informally, at home, in the office etc.
I got my degree online. Most of the materials I used, (and all the materials for Hebrew and Greek courses) were available to any Joe Schmoe who had a coupla' hundred bucks and a desire to learn.
Anyone who has studied the original languages knows that sometimes a word can have nuances of meanings which add some depth to what is written and translated. I am not talking about preachers regularly opening their bibles and acting like the word used "SHOULD BE ______" That annoys me to death. I have nowhere near the qualifications to question the abilities of the professionals who translated the ESV, KJV, NASB etc.....and neither do 98% of pastors who like to say: "The word should be ______". However, when different translations disagree (as they sometimes do) a knowledge of the originals weighs in on whether I agree with one particular translation's rendering vs. another's etc.etc.
Furthermore, studying other languages forces one to understand even English grammar better.
It is an extremely valuable tool.
One thing you cannot suggest IMO is that (used appropriately) someone with no knowledge of original languages is better equipped than someone with decent working knowledge.
One of them only has wrenches and pliers, the other also has a socket set in his toolbox.
There were good reasons why to take Greek and Hebrew in seminary, one of which is to "thoroughly equip" the pastor to be able to combat outsiders or even those inside the church (as I have experienced!) who might claim certain false doctrines based on a supposed "exegesis" of the original languages.
Case in point: the JW's misinterpretation of Jn 1:1 and how to refute their claim that no definite article in the final clause makes Jesus only "a god". How does the unequipped pastor really reply to such in a convincing manner?
Problem is the ones with the full tool box usually keep their tools pristine and never use them.Original language study is not about retranslating an English translation of the Bible.
I affirm the value of studying them.
What's wrong is the misuse of such knowledge. But that isn't exclusive to original languages either. All education can be abused.
Also, this is not always about higher degrees. One can study the original languages informally, at home, in the office etc.
I got my degree online. Most of the materials I used, (and all the materials for Hebrew and Greek courses) were available to any Joe Schmoe who had a coupla' hundred bucks and a desire to learn.
Anyone who has studied the original languages knows that sometimes a word can have nuances of meanings which add some depth to what is written and translated. I am not talking about preachers regularly opening their bibles and acting like the word used "SHOULD BE ______" That annoys me to death. I have nowhere near the qualifications to question the abilities of the professionals who translated the ESV, KJV, NASB etc.....and neither do 98% of pastors who like to say: "The word should be ______". However, when different translations disagree (as they sometimes do) a knowledge of the originals weighs in on whether I agree with one particular translation's rendering vs. another's etc.etc.
Furthermore, studying other languages forces one to understand even English grammar better.
It is an extremely valuable tool.
One thing you cannot suggest IMO is that (used appropriately) someone with no knowledge of original languages is better equipped than someone with decent working knowledge.
One of them only has wrenches and pliers, the other also has a socket set in his toolbox.
Think that there are those who really do misuse the greek/Hebrew, but better to have the chance to see use them!Problem is the ones with the full tool box usually keep their tools pristine and never use them.
No. What is the word of God is infallibe. Not the translation nor the reader.originals were Inerrant, and credible translations would be infallible...
if true, then since we do not have any originals, nothing infallible!No. What is the word of God is infallibe. Not the translation nor the reader.
We do not, as you yourself said, bave any of the originals. We have copies handed down from them. God's word is inerrant.if true, then since we do not have any originals, nothing infallible!
Not perfect, but reliable and trustworthy!We do not, as you yourself said, bave any of the originals. We have copies handed down from them. God's word is inerrant.
Maybe....Problem is the ones with the full tool box usually keep their tools pristine and never use them.
Interesting to me that the Lord jesus chose as the one to give forth Romans to us the greatest theologian in history, Paul, and he certainly was a man of "letters"Maybe....
But, the question is really about whether or not it is a valuable tool.
Truth is, it's a valuable tool.
One shouldn't judge the value of a pursuit by its abuse or misuse, but on the merits of the skillset itself.
Knowing Greek or Hebrew is, on its face, a valuable skillset. That it is often misused (I don't discount that, it's very true) is not the point though.
It is hardly the case that a rural country church with simple folk who simply want to know their Bibles and want to serve God should pay for a P.H.D.
But, here's the good news....
If they stop assuming that their pastors job is to be the sole visitor of every bored and lonely old lady over 60 and that all soul winning is their pastor's job...than they can get for themselves (at a bargain price) an extremely well-educated and knowledgeable pastor who has the time and resources to buy Pratico and Van-Pelts Basics of Biblical Hebrew (so Universal it is used at Gordon Gonwell, Liberty, SEBTS, R.T.S. and the University of London where I went)
It's right here...for next to nothing:
https://www.amazon.com/Learn-Biblical-Hebrew-Pack-Integrated/dp/0310523915/ref=sr_1_5?crid=24ZY5ZHA23CCC&keywords=basics+biblical+hebrew&qid=1581623828&sprefix=basics+bibli,aps,524&sr=8-5
This doesn't mean that he will get formal letters behind his name...
But, I have formal letters....and do you know what my course work was??
That information above.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Pastors need to be skilled and knowledgeable theologians and teachers who dilligently and regularly spend their time in prayer and the study of the word. You tend towards insisting that they spend hrs. a week knocking on doors, "soul-winning", visiting every member and kissing their boo-boos etc.
That's not what God called them to.
What God called them to, is to be that seminary professor you speak so poorly of.
I don't disagree. The "pillar and ground of the truth" is the local church, NOT the seminary...
If you don't want your pastors poisoned by an institution Jesus never instituted as the ground of Christian learning....than don't disparage the notion that pastors be the most highly educated persons they can possibly be.
Pastors MUST be the most highly educated and knowledgeable persons they can be.
They MUST be the best Theologians they can be.
This is simply classic Independent Baptist Ecclesiology at work.
It's not "letters" behind the name....it's the knowledge available.
You seem to be forcing us to choose between ignorant pastors and highly educated seminary professors....that's the wrong way to go about it.
Pastors need to actually be the theologians that we can look to and respect and learn from....Thus, teaching them original languages is an invaluable tool-set to equip them with.
You keep carping about pastors as passionate soul-winners....
Frankly, I disagree.
I want my pastor to care deeply about souls, but his job is to "equip the saints"... for the work of the ministry, not do the job for them.
Every post you make you seems to suggest that the highest calling a pastor has is to be a level 20 soul-winner.....and also a deacon.
That is EVERYTHING wrong with the local church:
It is the work of the members to be the visitors, soul-winners, etc... (also pastors don't escape this of course).
You want to pay a man to do YOUR job instead of his......
The role of a pastor is to equip the Saints, that requires knowledge and the best education he can get, formal or informal.
Otherwise, your only choice is ignorant (but passionate soul-winning) pastors..
and a flock that goes online to youtube or on a podcast or ANYWHERE other than the local church to find deep and learned theological truth.
Baptist Ecclesiology suggests that the local Church is the place where Theology is learned and practiced....
Therefore, your insistence that ignorant pastors are the best pastors of local churches is profoundly un-Baptist and incredibly destructive...… I'm sorry if this post is too long, and too harsh, but, I do think that it is a necessary commentary, and I believe what I say deeply.
God bless you.
More interestingly...…..(as far as word-count) Luke wrote more of the New Testament than Paul.Interesting to me that the Lord jesus chose as the one to give forth Romans to us the greatest theologian in history, Paul, and he certainly was a man of "letters"
More interesting to me is how some want only “men of letters” and some want only “unlearned fishermen,” while God in his sovereignty uses both.Interesting to me that the Lord jesus chose as the one to give forth Romans to us the greatest theologian in history, Paul, and he certainly was a man of "letters"
It would all depend on what you consider ignorance to be. Ignorance can be judged on a sliding scale. What do you need to be a good pastor? 2, 4, 6 year degree? Doctorate? Double Doctorate?Maybe....
But, the question is really about whether or not it is a valuable tool.
Truth is, it's a valuable tool.
One shouldn't judge the value of a pursuit by its abuse or misuse, but on the merits of the skillset itself.
Knowing Greek or Hebrew is, on its face, a valuable skillset. That it is often misused (I don't discount that, it's very true) is not the point though.
It is hardly the case that a rural country church with simple folk who simply want to know their Bibles and want to serve God should pay for a P.H.D.
But, here's the good news....
If they stop assuming that their pastors job is to be the sole visitor of every bored and lonely old lady over 60 and that all soul winning is their pastor's job...than they can get for themselves (at a bargain price) an extremely well-educated and knowledgeable pastor who has the time and resources to buy Pratico and Van-Pelts Basics of Biblical Hebrew (so Universal it is used at Gordon Gonwell, Liberty, SEBTS, R.T.S. and the University of London where I went)
It's right here...for next to nothing:
https://www.amazon.com/Learn-Biblical-Hebrew-Pack-Integrated/dp/0310523915/ref=sr_1_5?crid=24ZY5ZHA23CCC&keywords=basics+biblical+hebrew&qid=1581623828&sprefix=basics+bibli,aps,524&sr=8-5
This doesn't mean that he will get formal letters behind his name...
But, I have formal letters....and do you know what my course work was??
That information above.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Pastors need to be skilled and knowledgeable theologians and teachers who dilligently and regularly spend their time in prayer and the study of the word. You tend towards insisting that they spend hrs. a week knocking on doors, "soul-winning", visiting every member and kissing their boo-boos etc.
That's not what God called them to.
What God called them to, is to be that seminary professor you speak so poorly of.
I don't disagree. The "pillar and ground of the truth" is the local church, NOT the seminary...
If you don't want your pastors poisoned by an institution Jesus never instituted as the ground of Christian learning....than don't disparage the notion that pastors be the most highly educated persons they can possibly be.
Pastors MUST be the most highly educated and knowledgeable persons they can be.
They MUST be the best Theologians they can be.
This is simply classic Independent Baptist Ecclesiology at work.
It's not "letters" behind the name....it's the knowledge available.
You seem to be forcing us to choose between ignorant pastors and highly educated seminary professors....that's the wrong way to go about it.
Pastors need to actually be the theologians that we can look to and respect and learn from....Thus, teaching them original languages is an invaluable tool-set to equip them with.
You keep carping about pastors as passionate soul-winners....
Frankly, I disagree.
I want my pastor to care deeply about souls, but his job is to "equip the saints"... for the work of the ministry, not do the job for them.
Every post you make you seems to suggest that the highest calling a pastor has is to be a level 20 soul-winner.....and also a deacon.
That is EVERYTHING wrong with the local church:
It is the work of the members to be the visitors, soul-winners, etc... (also pastors don't escape this of course).
You want to pay a man to do YOUR job instead of his......
The role of a pastor is to equip the Saints, that requires knowledge and the best education he can get, formal or informal.
Otherwise, your only choice is ignorant (but passionate soul-winning) pastors..
and a flock that goes online to youtube or on a podcast or ANYWHERE other than the local church to find deep and learned theological truth.
Baptist Ecclesiology suggests that the local Church is the place where Theology is learned and practiced....
Therefore, your insistence that ignorant pastors are the best pastors of local churches is profoundly un-Baptist and incredibly destructive...… I'm sorry if this post is too long, and too harsh, but, I do think that it is a necessary commentary, and I believe what I say deeply.
God bless you.
They were the smartest and most learned of the bunch!More interestingly...…..(as far as word-count) Luke wrote more of the New Testament than Paul.
Some of our brethren seem to think God was a moron to choose the equivalent of a P.H.D. Theologian and a Medical doctor to write the New testament.
Yes indeed, but point is that getting well educated in not a sin!More interesting to me is how some want only “men of letters” and some want only “unlearned fishermen,” while God in his sovereignty uses both.
majority of what pastors are called by God to do though entail studying and preaching/teaching on scriptures....It would all depend on what you consider ignorance to be. Ignorance can be judged on a sliding scale. What do you need to be a good pastor? 2, 4, 6 year degree? Doctorate? Double Doctorate?
Compared to Al Mohler, 99% of pastors are ignorant. Why not set the education requirement equal to Mohlers education level?
Pastors should visit and personally evangelize outside the church doors. They should lead by example. The modern notion that pastors preach, pray, study, and hide in their office is leading to the demise of the SBC. Go witness to someone instead of worrying about a nuance.
.It would all depend on what you consider ignorance to be. Ignorance can be judged on a sliding scale
Anticipated and answered, I would refer you to the posts I have already submitted...What do you need to be a good pastor? 2, 4, 6 year degree? Doctorate? Double Doctorate?
That's only because you are referencing the fact that his is a terminal degree...namely a doctorate....Compared to Al Mohler, 99% of pastors are ignorant. Why not set the education requirement equal to Mohlers education level?
.Pastors should visit and personally evangelize outside the church doors
They should, that is self-evident "Leadership 101" that's not novel information, and they can do that either knowing Greek or not knowing Greek. I would assume it's best if they ALSO knew greek. Those aren't mutually-exclusive concepts.They should lead by example.
It's a profoundly biblical one, actually, I'm sorry if you hate it, but it is straight out of God's word. And that is not what's killing the S.B.C.The modern notion that pastors preach, pray, study, and hide in their office is leading to the demise of the SBC.
NO....Go witness to someone instead of worrying about a nuance.
Based on what?They were the smartest and most learned of the bunch!
That did not appear to be your initial point.Yes indeed, but point is that getting well educated in not a sin!
Not, just someone who has taught others....Based on what?
That did not appear to be your initial point.
By the way, getting religiously educated is not a sin for others either, even if not a pastor. It might be a sin to tell others that their education is only acceptable if gotten “our way.” As they say, a good education never hurt anyone who was willing to learn something afterwards.
Are you a pastor or preacher?
God's word is inerrant. Not people. People need to hear what is actually God's word in their own language so they can believe what is actually true.Not perfect, but reliable and trustworthy!