The Archangel
Well-Known Member
archangel
Evading the Truth is what you are doing, and nothing else !
What does Col 1:16 say ?
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
What is that word by in the original scholar joe ?
A scholar, was Adam Created ? Yes or No ?
Adam was created, yes. That has never been a point of debate. When Adam was created, God declared the creation as "Very good." The "by" in Colossians 1:16 is ἐν plus the dative which is:
...A marker of agent, often with the implication of an agent being used as an instrument, and in some instances relating to general behavior rather than to some specific event
Johannes P. Louw and Eugene Albert Nida, vol. 1, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains, electronic ed. of the 2nd edition. (New York: United Bible Societies, 1996), 796.
No where is "Sin" implied or specified as something created by God.Johannes P. Louw and Eugene Albert Nida, vol. 1, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains, electronic ed. of the 2nd edition. (New York: United Bible Societies, 1996), 796.
What is more, your following statements:
In God being the First cause of sin into His World/ Creation, He by His Wisdom, deemed it essential for His Own Glory, and the accomplishment of His Eternal Purpose in Christ Jesus Eph 3:8-11
That God is the First and Primary cause of the evil in our hearts is perceived by the godly david, for his prayer here indicates that Ps 141:4
Neither say nor imply anything about God creating sin.
What is more, according to James, God cannot be the author of sin:
[12] Blessed is the man who remains steadfast under trial, for when he has stood the test he will receive the crown of life, which God has promised to those who love him. [13] Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one. [14] But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. [15] Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death. [16] Do not be deceived, my beloved brothers. [17] Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change. [18] Of his own will he brought us forth by the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures. (James 1:12-18 ESV)
This passage specifically and categorically nullifies your assertions that God is the first cause of sin. Not only can God not be tempted with evil, He Himself cannot tempt anyone with evil. This is a clear and fundamental statement of the free will of mankind--a will that is bound by sin at the Fall and a will that was "able to sin and able not to sin" before the fall.
Furthermore, if it is true that "every good and perfect gift is from above" where did evil come from? It certainly cannot be from God since evil itself is neither good nor perfect.
Moreover, Romans 5 clearly states that is was man, not God, that brought sin into the world:
[12] Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned—[13] for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. [14] Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come. (Romans 5:12-14 ESV)
So, your assertions are simply not possible under any biblical circumstance. You are simply wrong, you've demonstrated that you have no regard for authorial intent, and you've demonstrated that you cannot or will not care to handle God's word rightly.Your method of whatever-it-is-you-call-it-bible-study cannot and will not lead to anything but error--even as we've seen you demonstrate here.
After all, expository preaching is demonstrated fully and faithfully in this passage of Nehemiah:
[1] And all the people gathered as one man into the square before the Water Gate. And they told Ezra the scribe to bring the Book of the Law of Moses that the LORD had commanded Israel. [2] So Ezra the priest brought the Law before the assembly, both men and women and all who could understand what they heard, on the first day of the seventh month. [3] And he read from it facing the square before the Water Gate from early morning until midday, in the presence of the men and the women and those who could understand. And the ears of all the people were attentive to the Book of the Law. [4] And Ezra the scribe stood on a wooden platform that they had made for the purpose. And beside him stood Mattithiah, Shema, Anaiah, Uriah, Hilkiah, and Maaseiah on his right hand, and Pedaiah, Mishael, Malchijah, Hashum, Hashbaddanah, Zechariah, and Meshullam on his left hand. [5] And Ezra opened the book in the sight of all the people, for he was above all the people, and as he opened it all the people stood. [6] And Ezra blessed the LORD, the great God, and all the people answered, “Amen, Amen,” lifting up their hands. And they bowed their heads and worshiped the LORD with their faces to the ground. [7] Also Jeshua, Bani, Sherebiah, Jamin, Akkub, Shabbethai, Hodiah, Maaseiah, Kelita, Azariah, Jozabad, Hanan, Pelaiah, the Levites, helped the people to understand the Law, while the people remained in their places. [8] They read from the book, from the Law of God, clearly, and they gave the sense, so that the people understood the reading. (Nehemiah 8:1-8 ESV)
The word was read aloud and it was explained to the people. Ezra, Nehemiah and those with them were intent on saying: "Thus says the LORD" and they could only do that if they spoke His words and He intended them.There is an objective meaning to the text--which is paramount to understanding the Scripture. You are tirelessly imposing a subjective meaning on the text. You're more thinking "What does this mean to me" when you should be asking "What has God said in this text?" It matters not what you think a text means; it matter greatly what God has said in a specific text. His meaning trumps yours any day.
The Archangel
Last edited by a moderator: