<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Clint Kritzer:
I will attempt to stay on subject.
Good morning from the US, sir.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Hi Clint. You can just call me excreationist.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>....You are quite correct in your assertion that the New Testament does not directly condemn slavery.
I am not one to go through contortions to defend my faith. The point you raise is fair and you have certainly met us on our "turf" which I can respect. However, the Christian philosophy, though based in scripture, is more than following a set of rules set forth in a Book. There is an underlying theme and a prevailing attitude in the New Testament of how we are to treat our fellow man.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I wish to present to you scripture that, though it does not mention slaves in specific, does set forth our "code of conduct," if you will, on our treatment of our fellow man.
...Christ used a Samaritan because they were considered, by the Jews to be lower even than the Gentiles. I am sure that you are also familiar with the "Golden Rule" found in
Matthew 7:12 which states the most basic guide for following a Christian life.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
In that verse Jesus claims that the Golden Rule "sums up the Law and the Prophets." But in Matthew 22:37, Mark 12:30 & Luke 10:27, Jesus says that obeying the commandments also involves loving "the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength." (Matthew 22:37 doesn't include "strength" though)
This way the commandments like "Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God." make sense. (Exodus 34:14)
That commandment can't be justified by the Golden Rule I think. Other examples include:
Exodus 19:12 - "Put limits for the people around the mountain [Sinai] and tell them, `Be careful that you do not go up the mountain or touch the foot of it. Whoever touches the mountain shall surely be put to death."
Leviticus 24:16 - "anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death."
Numbers 1:51 - "Whenever the tabernacle is to move, the Levites are to take it down, and whenever the tabernacle is to be set up, the Levites shall do it. Anyone else who goes near it shall be put to death."
...etc.
But maybe those things only apply to Jews. (Except the part about only worshipping God - and that involves more than the Golden Rule)
Anyway, it means not just obeying the Golden Rule (which can lead to hippie-style free-love) but only being guided by God's laws I think. Since you're supposed to love God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength then you'd try and keep his commandments even though your salvation isn't dependent on it. But you could just keep the commandments out of gratitude.
Anyway, though in the OT God commanded his people to take slaves, in the NT, he just permitted them to have slaves. Maybe it is like divorce - where it is permitted, but perhaps should be avoided if possible. But today we have gone against the Christian advice on divorce and gone back to the laws given to Moses. see
Matthew 5:31-32,
Matthew 19:3-12 and
Mark 10:2-12.
I don't think Jesus's only command was the Golden Rule. e.g. when he went into the temple, overturned the tables, scattered the money and using a whip made of cords he drove the people and animals out. (see
Matthew 21:12-13,
Mark 11:15-17 &
John 2:14-16)
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Also, if you read the letters of Paul and the other New Testament books, there is a prevailing theme of making the church acceptable to the prevailing culture.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah, Paul says that you don't have to bother being circumcized to be a Christian, etc, even though in the OT it was necessary in order to be one of God's people. But "...no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him." (John 13:16) And the OT involved words directly from God.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>It is late in the morning but if you like I will find specifics for you at our next meeting. Slavery, at the time of the writing of the New Testament, was a reality in those culture, thus, the proper treatment of slaves was stressed.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah, but Christians could have set their slaves free and hire them as servants.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>...Paul does not demand release, but he appeals to his fellow believer's Christian attitude to guide him in his treatment of this man who is considered "property."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah, in my first post I talked about the book of Philemon. Paul could have at least suggested the slave be forgiven and given his freedom (rather than demanding this).
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I would also point to
Galatians 3:28 which points to the Christian belief that we are all on an equal footing through Christ.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I talked about this verse in my first post, and also my second post on page 2.