Only if you properly understand saving faith as a gift from God, and not a personal choice. If faith is a moral choice, then it IS salvation based on merit (works).
Only by faith being a gift given to us by God, is it not a work.
well put.....
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Only if you properly understand saving faith as a gift from God, and not a personal choice. If faith is a moral choice, then it IS salvation based on merit (works).
Only by faith being a gift given to us by God, is it not a work.
Only if you properly understand saving faith as a gift from God, and not a personal choice. If faith is a moral choice, then it IS salvation based on merit (works).
Only by faith being a gift given to us by God, is it not a work.
I don't know about it being a "bummer" to see God is in control of salvation...but it is certainly humbling.Must be a bummer....thinking of yourself as a robot. :smilewinkgrin:
I don't know about it being a "bummer" to see God is in control of salvation...but it is certainly humbling.
On the contrary, you must feel very proud of yourself knowing that you are the master of your own destiny...that it is all up to you...or at least mostly up to you.
I would much rather suffer the ignorant chants of "robot" than to think myself the master of my own destiny.
peace to youraying:
I know of no person of "reformed thinking" that pronounces himself in the manner you say. On the contrary, the focus is always upon the gracious work of God in the lives of helpless sinners.You"re right, I guess I wouldn’t understand about the “humbling” feelings of being and pronouncing myself to others as… “specially pre-selected”… as per the Predestinarian’s dogmatic claims.
"All men have a choice"? "The promise of salvation of made to all men before the foundation of the world?" Really?Although, I do understand the fact that I and all men have a choice as per our gracious and loving God’s true nature and promises made in the Son to all men before the foundation of the world.
Who frets about making a that choice? Reformed Christians readily acknowledge the need to come to Christ in faith. We just realize it was nothing within ourselves, but the entire process of salvation is a gift of God from beginning to end. We respond to His drawing with faith, but even that faith is a gift of God.I’ll not suffer and fret about having to willingly make that choice to accept my Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, …like some do. I rather thank Him for His truly gracious act that provided a way for all men to receive the leading of the Spirit and become willingly in bondage to Him, in which, I am free indeed.
When you are led by someone, it is a passive activity.(Romans 8:14) For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
Well, you go right ahead and be comfortable. I'll follow what scripture says.Yep, I’m actually quite comfortable admitting there is free will as per God’s Devine design.
Regardless if faith is a gift or not (it's not, btw), who must have faith? How does one commit a "work" in either scenario by excercising faith in Christ? Whether if it's given or not, it is not considered a work in either instance.Only if you properly understand saving faith as a gift from God, and not a personal choice. If faith is a moral choice, then it IS salvation based on merit (works).
Only by faith being a gift given to us by God, is it not a work.
Regardless if faith is a gift or not (it's not, btw), who must have faith? How does one commit a "work" in either scenario by excercising faith in Christ? Whether if it's given or not, it is not considered a work in either instance.
Even if you say the gospel of Christ only came after the resurrection of Jesus, surely you realize there is no evidence the gospel reached the entire world before a single person died? Do you believe the gospel reached the entire world before a single person died after the resurrection?
Will you acknowledge that people lived their lives without ever hearing the gospel of Jesus Christ? Will you acknowledge that people live their lives even to this day without ever hearing the gospel of Jesus Christ?
If people died before hearing the gospel, how can your statement be true that "all men have a choice?". Is it that they "respond to the light they have?" Oh, then there must be other ways to heaven rather than the gospel of Jesus Christ. Is that what you believe?
No, then you must acknowledge that everyone did not have a chance to respond to the gospel. Do you believe that to be unfair? Surely you must believe God is unfair?
These very issues are at the crux of what I have been trying to say. Romans 1 sets forth that all men have been given sufficient light ("they are without excuse [when they get to heaven]"), and will be able to hear the gospel as God sends a missionary (or anyone) to tell them of Jesus, if & when they act on this light from "faith to faith."What was so special about you and/or me, that we would be born in a country where we were able to hear the gospel? Nothing, of course. It was part of God's sovereign purpose.
There is no evidence in scripture that general revelation proved "sufficient light" for salvation for anyone, or that those who hear and respond to the gospel of Jesus Christ must first exercise some sort of faith in God due to the general revelation.These very issues are at the crux of what I have been trying to say. Romans 1 sets forth that all men have been given sufficient light ("they are without excuse [when they get to heaven]"), and will be able to hear the gospel as God sends a missionary (or anyone) to tell them of Jesus, if & when they act on this light from "faith to faith."
And all men rejected general revelation and all men stood condemned by God.All men do have this choice for it is clearly seen, even His eternal power and Godhead. All men from all time had the choice to believe in the Messiah to come whom was clearly prophesied in everything the Jews had to do and read, or in the Messiah that has now come -- the one and same Jesus.
That is simply not true. All men have not heard the specific revelation of who Jesus is and what He has done. If they had, there would be no need for the great commission, and no need for missionaries.So no matter which country, or which time, all men have heard, or could hear, of the only way to heaven (Jesus) if they would act on the clearly seen evidence.
I agree. It appears we have a difference of opinion as to application, however.The logic & truth of Romans 1 is pretty ironclad -- both what it is saying as well as the implications on Total Depravity, and the rest of TULIP.
Mat 13:12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.There is no evidence in scripture that general revelation proved "sufficient light" for salvation for anyone, or that those who hear and respond to the gospel of Jesus Christ must first exercise some sort of faith in God due to the general revelation.
peace to youraying:
I believe these passages are referring to those who are saved (or profess to be saved) and already working for the master.Mat 13:12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
I believe these passages are referring to those who are saved (or profess to be saved) and already working for the master.
peace to youraying:
Well, if you backed up one verse, you'll see more of a context was that He was speaking to both.Really?
Mat 13:15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and [their] ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with [their] eyes, and hear with [their] ears, and should understand with [their] heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
In contrast:
Mat 13:16 But blessed [are] your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
Jesus was not speaking of "saved people" in Matt. 13:12. He was speaking of people who refused to listen to Him. They were given light, but would not see. Therefore, what they did have would be taken away. Their fate would be sealed due to their own stubbornness.
BTW, Jesus doesn't say they "had light". He says He deliberately spoke to them in parables so they wouldn't be able to understand. Why? Because it had not been granted to them by God to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven.