• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Some Examples of News Media Bias

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
...I think he's going to go down as the most protected candidate ever.

Case in point. Watch how reporters are shooed away from asking more questions, and not really putting up much of a fight. "kay guys, lets go, come on..... it's Joe's nap time"

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1293973630808883200?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1293973630808883200|twgr^&ref_url=https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/watch-joe-bidens-handlers-swiftly-move-protect-biden-kick-reporters-biden-harris-coronavirus-briefing/
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Examples of pure bias by the mainstream media is fairly rare, but there are many examples of bias by association or bias by what gets reported. I like to get my news from C-SPAN. During the day (for the most part) they turn a camera on press conferences, floor debates, or have a camera crew follow around a candidate. There is very little commentary or op-eds. I can watch what happens and make my own conclusions. So it's interesting to watch an event on C-SPAN and then catch how the MSM handles it. You can tell the bias by the news station in what they choose to cover and how they put a spin on it.

1. A good example was the recent incident when Trump called a meeting with Congressional leaders (McConnell, Ryan, Schumer, Pelosi) for Tuesday afternoon. On Tuesday morning Trump tweeted that Schumer and Pelosi were soft on crime, soft on immigration, wanted to raise taxes and that he expected nothing to come of the meeting that afternoon. Schumer and Pelosi subsequently decided not to attend the meeting since they figured "the President doesn't see a deal between Democrats and the White House."

So what was reported?
I saw Bret Baier's Fox News show later that afternoon state that Schumer and Pelosi had turned down an invitation to meet with Trump to discuss keeping the government running and avoiding a shutdown, then Fox showed a picture of Trump sitting in between two empty chairs with Schumer and Pelosi nameplates in front of the empty chairs. Implication--Democrats are afraid to meet with Trump and want to shut down the government.

CNN and MSNBC showed a graphic of Trump's tweet insulting the two Democrats then told how they declined to attend the meeting because of Trump's insults and tweet-baiting. They even brought up the "delusional" card. Implication--Trump is unfit to govern and he wants to shut down the government.

2. Headline half-truths. This one epitomizes what is wrong with the mainstream media. This one is similar to the joke about the NY Times reporting on the imminent annihilation of earth by an asteroid with the headline, "Earth to be Destroyed: Minorities and Children Hit Hardest"


From the Washington Post:
38 Percent of Americans Won’t Get a Sizable Tax Cut Under the Senate GOP Plan

Sounds bad, huh? "38 percent won't get a sizable tax cut". But consider--well that means that 62% WILL get a sizable tax cut! Why wasn't the headline "62 Percent Will Get a Sizable Tax Cut". Furthermore, the way the headline is written it allows that within that 38 percent are many people that WILL get a tax cut, just not "sizable" whatever that number is, and it is at the whim of the WaPo writer. Consider a baseball team that "only counts 38 percent of their games as losses", well their W-L record at the end of the season would be 100-62, that's probably good enough to win the division, certainly make the playoffs. Or consider a candidate that gets 62% of the vote. That's a landslide victory.

3. Opinions presented as news. This one always bothers me. Not so much during election season--there is some relevance--but for every day stuff an opinion poll simply is not news. You wonder why the MSM keeps running "news" stories about Trump's unpopularity ratings? It's a way for them to overtly show they disapprove of Trump. Or a "news" story about the number of editorials that have come out for or against a certain issue or person.

Here's a great compound example of this that also crosses another line. The NY Times ran an editorial recently condemning the GOP tax reform plan. But that wasn't enough for the NY Times. Oh, no, they went ahead and placed a call to action at the end of the op-ed piece imploring people to call their congressional reps and demand they vote NO on the bill. I don't think I've ever seen that before. But wait, there's more! TheHill.com "reported" on this, presenting it as a "news" story:

NY Times Editorial Board Tells Readers to Call Senators to Oppose GOP Tax Bill

Ha ha ha! Can you get any more blatant?!

4. This one is interesting, guilt by association.
Alcohol is already linked to 88,000 deaths each year. The Senate tax bill could add 1,550 deaths to that annual toll.

I had no idea the Senate tax bill was a drinker. Or that it could drive ("Story" is from Vox.com)

5. Celebrities as political experts/commentators
The West Wing’ cast hits Huckabee Sanders for comparing herself to character

So, one of the cast of the West Wing, a TV show which was canceled in 2006, took offense to something that White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said about the show. The cast member of the West Wing took umbrage because Huckabee Sanders compared her job to the job of the press secretary in the West Wing. This is simply another way for the MSM to slam members of the Trump administration
This is news, ladies and gentleman!

Anyway, keep your eyes peeled for bias in the MSM. It's everywhere. Thing is, most of us are so inured by it, we hardly notice it, especially when it's practiced by "our side".
Tell me In The Light, is this (see attached) credible information or a lie.

Thanks

 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think he's going to go down as the most protected candidate ever. They're even pushing to get him out of the debates. You don't see the irony?

I don’t. Consider that the media thinks all politicians are fair game and they are the ones who judiciously report the news to us simpletons....thus they are on a mission so all politicians are fair game. Trump is just the flavor of the day but boy has he painted a big red target on his back. His brother in gaff, the son of Scranton :Rolleyes doesn’t know how to shut up so he will screw up and called out for his blunders. Remember he now has Kammy, America’s Auntie looking for him to stumble or just plain drop dead to become POTUS.... the press I’m sure will be more than happy to give Joe a shove.
 
Last edited:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Trump calls fake news the enemy of the people; CNN and certain other news organizations take offense. Hmmm

.

Ripped right from the “Government is the enemy of the people” and we the people have a right to a free press ... so then, the press is really the enemy of politicians.:Wink
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
I don’t. Consider that the media thinks all politicians are fair game and they are the ones who judiciously report the news to us simpletons....thus they are on a mission so all politicians are fair game. Trump is just the flavor of the day but boy has he painted a big red target on his back. His brother in gaff, the son of Scranton :Rolleyes doesn’t know how to shut up so he will screw up and called out for his blunders. Remember he now has Kammy, America’s Auntie looking for him to stumble or just plain drop dead to become POTUS.... the press I’m sure will be more than happy to give Joe a shove.
As Joe would say, “Come on, man, that’s malarkey.” The media do not see all politicians as fair game, rather they see politics as fair game, with the right to prejudiciously tear down or build up anyone they wish. It’s called “freedom of the press.”

The MSM has been generally unfavorable to Republicans and favorable to Democrats for a rather long time. Bloomberg was practicing this incessantly during the Dem debates. But they will also certainly try to make money, thus sensationalism abounds.

The progressive leftist media is protecting Joe B furiously and inanely from all negative exposure, excusing his every failure as if they were successes. He is the Dem candidate, demented or not—their hopeful ticket into the WH. Sure, they will be more than happy to throw him under the bus, once he is no longer a candidate, whether as loser or as president, but not before.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As Joe would say, “Come on, man, that’s malarkey.” The media do not see all politicians as fair game, rather they see politics as fair game, with the right to prejudiciously tear down or build up anyone they wish. It’s called “freedom of the press.”

The MSM has been generally unfavorable to Republicans and favorable to Democrats for a rather long time. Bloomberg was practicing this incessantly during the Dem debates. But they will also certainly try to make money, thus sensationalism abounds.

The progressive leftist media is protecting Joe B furiously and inanely from all negative exposure, excusing his every failure as if they were successes. He is the Dem candidate, demented or not—their hopeful ticket into the WH. Sure, they will be more than happy to throw him under the bus, once he is no longer a candidate, whether as loser or as president, but not before.
I didn’t say before.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Apparently, the White House really is a dump — with work orders showing reports of mice and cockroach infestations in the West Wing, broken toilet seats in the Oval Office and numerous other problems.

White House officials made hundreds of requests for repairs, equipment and pest control in 2017 with the US General Services Administration — many of which were similar to those made in 2016 during President Barack Obama’s final year in office, NBC4 reports.

The work orders were similar in number and included reports of mice, cockroaches and even ants. The vermin reportedly infiltrated numerous areas on the grounds — including the White House Navy mess food hall, the Situation Room and the chief of staff’s office.

View attachment 1861

https://nypost.com/2017/11/30/turns-out-the-white-house-is-a-real-dump/
That does not make sense to me. I was told to leave snakes alone because they eat mice and bugs. If true, DC should be pest free.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
When I ran for State Assembly many years ago -
The newspaper reported I was a truck driver.
Actually, I was a Taxi driver.
I can understand how easy it is to get a truck and taxi mixed up!
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
WATCH: For the second day in a row this afternoon, Biden's handlers swiftly moved to protect Biden and Harris and kicked reporters out as they shouted questions. What are they so afraid of??

LOL, second day in a row. And that same woman. "okay guys, come on, come on...."

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1294314405199589377?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1294314405199589377|twgr^&ref_url=https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/second-day-row-bidens-handlers-swiftly-move-protect-biden-harris-kick-reporters-shout-questions-video/

What amazes me is how obedient the press is. Very little fuss so far.

From watching CSPAN and reading press releases I know the usual procedure at these sorts of public relations stunts is they issue a statement that so-and-so will be appearing at "x o'clock" at "location y" to "present an accolade" or "sign a document" or some other action. Typically there is a disclaimer: "Questions will not be taken." I mean, it's how these things are conducted.

You are correct that it is damage control by Biden's handlers to get him away from the press. But the media walking away from a PR event where they know a Q&A session was not on the agenda is not media bias.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From watching CSPAN and reading press releases I know the usual procedure at these sorts of public relations stunts is they issue a statement that so-and-so will be appearing at "x o'clock" at "location y" to "present an accolade" or "sign a document" or some other action. Typically there is a disclaimer: "Questions will not be taken." I mean, it's how these things are conducted.

You are correct that it is damage control by Biden's handlers to get him away from the press. But the media walking away from a PR event where they know a Q&A session was not on the agenda is not media bias.

I'll trust your knowledge on this one. No doubt team T is taking advantage of it.

Aesthetically, I can't imagine team B thinks this is a good thing, especially the shooing part.
 
Top