Originally posted by Frogman:
Dear Brother Eric,
Read a public High School History textbook and discuss with the students Greek Mythology, Roman dieties, Hinduism, Bhuddism, or Islam.
Then read the short paragraph on Christianity which focuses on the evils of the RCC and 'christians' in general during the crusades.
I have three children--two in high school and one in college--and I sympathize with what you're talking about. I think the wrongs of Christianity are more emphasized in their textbooks than how it has benefitted society.
One point that really gets me is the references to the Great Awakening in the United States. I have seen three textbooks, and it seems as if the
only sermon ever mentioned is "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," by Jonathan Edwards. In my daughter's history class, the teacher photocopied extracts from this sermon and handed them out to the students.
Now, I'm a Baptist and I believe in the doctrine of eternal punishment in hell ... but it sure seems biased that the
only Christian sermon in the class to be reprinted is an extremely vivid Christian sermon on hell. When the class studies Hinduism, they don't reprint Hindu sermons on hell (e.g., from the
Srimad Bhagavatam, 5th canto, part 2).
Fortunately, my daughter has a father who has a lot of books on church history, so I was able to get her to read some other writings of Edwards to show that the extract were an example of selective citation. But her teacher probably pats herself on her back for being "fair" and passing out a Christian sermon while discussing American revivals.
Then discuss Christianity and what is believed, just as the text discusses the others and what is believed.
Then tell me Christianity is not suffering prejudice among our public school.
Brother Dallas, I
do think that the textbooks that teach history have a bias in them. I don't like the blotches in Christianity mentioned so much. Maybe that "comes with the territory," since Christianity does claim to regenerate and renew the hearts of believers, and so perhaps the unsaved have a right to ask, "Why didn't this work the way you promised it would?"
The examples we are discussing are (as you know) examples of social bias represented in textbooks, which really are not a First Amendment issue. Christianity not being popular or welcome is not the same as Christianity being legally excluded from the exercise of its faith.
Just to play devil's advocate, I'd say that although a general Christian consensus was the predominant view for many generations in the U.S., perhaps books on global cultures feel they don't need to give equal time to the dominant culture, precisely because it
has been dominant. Therefore, other cultures, religions, and histories are emphasized even more, as an offset to the presumed weighting already in place. (I hope that makes sense.)
--
Eric Pement