1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Son of JOHN 3:16 :)

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by atpollard, Jan 25, 2021.

  1. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Rev 5:9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;

    The kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation were redeemed ...out of the world. They therefore, by definition, cannot be the world (John 3:16) but only a subset of the world (John 3:16).

    As to the classic semi-Pelagian canard, we'll shoot that duck another day.

    I didn't bend anything. It's the plain reading. I'm saying world = world.
    You're redefining world as "world of the elect".
    Who's bending?
    Mat 7:5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
     
    #21 George Antonios, Jan 27, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
  2. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In reverse order, the comment on 'Semi-Palagian bending' was intended as a teasing response to your baiting statement: "This is plain, straightforward, and non-controversial." (Of course the Calvinism/Arminianism aspect of John 3:16 is completely non-controversial) :rolleyes:

    OK, so World = World.
    Does John 3:17 = God failed?

    Explain how the two verses fit together since adjacent verses in the same paragraph must share context.
    You have already rejected my answer.

    [John 3:16-17 NASB] 16 "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17 "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.

    [John 3:16-17 YLT] 16 for God did so love the world, that His Son -- the only begotten -- He gave, that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during. 17 For God did not send His Son to the world that he may judge the world, but that the world may be saved through him;

    [John 3:16-17 CSB] 16 "For God loved the world in this way: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 "For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.
     
  3. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A) The law could not communicate righteousness (Gal.3:21). Did the law fail?
    Or was it rather that the law was spiritual yet men were carnal so that the fault was in man that the law did not effect righteousness? As it is written:
    • Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, ---> Why? Because the law itself was weak? No:
    • in that it was weak through the flesh, ---> The instrument was weak.
    Likewise, the failure is not attributable to God, to the sinful heart of man which rejects the gospel.
    God purposed to bring the initial Exodus generation into the promised land, but that didn't happen save for 2 men.
    Was the failure attributable to God, or men?

    Please understand: God does, in his own power and will, choose to limit his himself, in some areas, to the free will of men, so that God himself allows the free will of men to frustrate his own desire, on some things - and it breaks his heart - just like our kids do in their free will.
    You dear Calvinist brethren need to stop trying to "save" God from "embarrassing" himself because he allows us to thwart his will for our salvation. It's cringe-y to watch.

    B) The view that because most mankind is lost and therefore God has somehow "failed" is an incredibly narrow view based on our temporal bias. The effect of the cross is that, ultimately, the millennial kingdom comes in, and reaches out into eternity, with a limitless number of sinless humans being born and begetting other sinless humans (1); with the serpent eternally destroyed in fire. So that, overall, but an infinitesimal fraction of mankind, relative to eternity, will have been lost. A resounding success in saving the world.

    (1) It's only the children of the resurrection that don't marry, not the ones that go out alive into the kingdom from the tribulation, or the people which shall be created (Ps.102:18) - but that's a topic for another day.
     
    #23 George Antonios, Jan 27, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
  4. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That was an EPIC FAIL.

    I am not asking for a Biblical proof of a doctrine. I am quite capable of providing a biblical defense of almost any doctrine and certainly the Wesleyan compatibility of the Sovereignty of God and the Free Will of men taught by the Church of God where I learned that such a thing as "Bible precepts" even existed.

    You offered a simple, clear, unavoidable and universal definition of WORLD in John 3:16 to mean "all mankind without exception" and went so far as to claim that any other definition was impossible. The same word WORLD appears in the very next verse again referring to a collection of men (as opposed to the ground and sky). So applying YOUR DEFINITION we get:

    [John 3:16-17 CSB] 16 "For God loved [all mankind without exception] in this way: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 "For God did not send his Son into [all mankind without exception] to condemn [all mankind without exception], but to save [all mankind without exception] through him.

    Did God save all mankind without exception through Jesus?
    How is that not a problem given the above statements?
    Did God fail in His stated goal to save all mankind without exception?


    (and yet, "His people from every nation, tribe and tongue" both fits with the verses and agrees with empirical reality.)

    [John 3:16-17 CSB] 16 "For God loved [His people from every nation, tribe and tongue] in this way: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 "For God did not send his Son into [His people from every nation, tribe and tongue] to condemn [His people from every nation, tribe and tongue], but to save [His people from every nation, tribe and tongue] through him.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Exactly.

    Just answered in post #23, to which your only reply was "EPIC FAIL".

    Well ok then. Moving on.
     
  6. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    God says he is going to save the WORLD.
    That really means that God is going to save everyone without exception.
    Most people end up in Hell.

    ... and Calvinists get a rap for "twisting scripture to fit our theology". :Coffee
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    to save whosoever believeth in him and potentially the whole world if the whole world chooses to believe on him.

    "twisting scripture to fit our theology" like you just did.
     
  8. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You ignored point B.
     
  9. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "... but to save the world through him." John 3:17

    Ignoring those inconvenient adjacent verses, like always.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Point B does not change the fact that God SAID one thing in John 3:17 and DID the opposite according to all those verses about "wide and narrow" and "many and few" ... if we apply YOUR irrefutable definition of WORLD to verse 17.
     
  11. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,742
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    God loved humankind in this way, He gave His one of a kind Son so that everyone believing into Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

    Thus Christ's death did not save everyone, but did provide the means of salvation to everyone believing into Him.

    To believe into Him means the person's faith was credited as righteousness by God and therefore God put them into Christ.

    Everyone God puts into Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

    The Gospel of Christ.
     
  12. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Here are the insults semi Pelagians.. You are incapable to have an honest debate with out insults, So Christian of you. Jn 3 :16 says God so loved the world. If this is true God even loves the sinners who won't come to Him. Believe me when I say you are not elect because there is no election for Gentiles.It wouldn't matter any way because we are all considered the same. The Calvinist tries to separate us again
    MB
     
  13. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Reformed theologins disagree with just about everyone even them selves/
    MB
     
  14. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm not ignoring it. My view admits both.
    He made provision for the salvation of the whole world, but only those of the world who believe avail themselves of that provision.
    It's a provision and an intent. And yes, God's will, in the sense of desire, is frustrated by most men's refusal to accept the gospel - which is why he weeps!

    God gave us kids to understand that.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  15. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think you missed a post:


    But thank you for the loving example of “an eye for an eye” rather than “turning the other cheek”. ;)
     
  16. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :)
    Ok, that was funny.
     
  17. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just as I am guilty of adding “chosen world” to John 3:16, you are adding “provision to save” to John 3:17.


    [Although technically, I do not dogmatically support that “world” in John 3:16 does not mean all of mankind, since the verse claims that God loved the world and saved “whoever believes” (it does not say that God saved the world). As I tried to explain, I believe that all three meanings were intended because God has one type of Love for those who believe, another type of love for all of mankind, and a third type of love for all of creation ... and all three benefitted from the life, death and resurrection of Christ. Some were “born again”, some were offered salvation, and creation will be restored.]
     
    #37 atpollard, Jan 27, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2021
    • Informative Informative x 1
  18. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ...
     
  19. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I see your points. :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. Brightfame52

    Brightfame52 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2020
    Messages:
    3,348
    Likes Received:
    558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Those Christ died for were saved by His death, what does Peter say to these believers 1 Pet 2:24

    24 who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

    Now what do think stripes mean here ? And what do you believe healed is here ?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
Loading...