OldRegular
Well-Known Member
Grasshopper
I believe someone has us confused.
OR
I believe someone has us confused.
OR

Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, Ed is confused about more than just prophecy.Grasshopper
I believe someone has us confused.
Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
Amen, Brother Daniel David -- preach it!![]()
OldRegular: " ... From these Scripture it appears that the ONE Church"
Yes, One eternal church from the time of the Advent
through the Millinnial Kingdom, through out the new
heavens and the new Earth.
However, over time there are 2 different
churches as i specified above.
OldRegular: : " ... dispensational, a doctrine that was invented about 1830"
HOw come it gets proved from the cannon, the Holy Bible, which
was completely written by 96AD?
BTW, I'll say the same thing to anybody who says the pretribulation
rapture doctrine was made by John Darby in 1830. He put
the name on it. BTW, i'm no defender of any dispensational
theory, but i hate for it to get a bad rap by the method
of misrepresentation.
Amen to that!BTW, the non-Baptist Christians are generally kinder than Baptist Christians.
It is not speaking of IQ.quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan.12
[4] But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
[9] And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
many shall run to and fro, This holiday weekend is the largest number of travelers in recorded history in this country alone. Over 31 million vehicles on the roads, over 16 million passengers in the skies.
knowledge shall be increased.
Ed says everyone born after AD33 has lived in the 'last days". You say only those in this century live in the "last days" the inspired writer of Hebrews says he was living in the "last days" Who should I believe? Tough choice.Whether they did or not is a moot point. It wasn't the last days yet.
Good, then you won't use that reasoning against preterism anymore.Grasshopper, can you show me one theologian / pastor who openly taught and published justification by faith alone after the fathers and prior to the reformation?
It matters little whether I can produce a name. Truth does not depend on it being published widespread.
Whats wrong Ed? Is it to tough a question? Is the new Heavens and New Earth of Rev. the same as the ones found in II Peter3 and Is. 65 and 66? And how does it fit into your little chart?grasshopper: "I do, but you won't/can't answer. I'll try once more:"
Careful there not to get whiplash patting
yourself on the back
No it just means their more recent, not traditional.That is what I mean when I said:
The pretribulation SBCs outnumber the
other SBCs (which also believe in traditional
eschatology).
This implies that the other SBC positions as you
noted are "traditional eschatology".
So who is right:you,Ed, or the writer of Hebrews?GH, I already cleared that up about End Times / Last Days. Please read my post above. Thanks
See you there, Brother Ed.Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
I'd really rather discuss eschatology here:
http://www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/28/2930.html
non-Baptist Christians can join us there,
but not here.
Here i have to keep duplicating my posts.
To that end, i now boycott this thread.
BTW, the non-Baptist Christians are generally
kinder than Baptist Christians![]()
The doctrine of premillenialism and imminence does not a dispensationalist make. It is the following error:Originally posted by Daniel David:
Grasshopper, when have I ever required the name of a preterist theologian? I don't care anything about preterism for the same reason I don't care about Mormon theology. I have no interest in studying error.
Further, it is the nondispies who try to argue from history. Dispensationalism was SYSTEMATIZED by Darby. However, the doctrine of premillenialism and imminence were already known.
Impossible! The SBC never existed until 1845. The south baptists seperated from the northern baptists over the issue of slavery.Originally posted by Grasshopper:
Find me a SBC pastor or theologian who believed what you do, pre-1800.
The doctrine of premillenialism and imminence does not a dispensationalist make. It is the following error:Originally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Daniel David:
Grasshopper, when have I ever required the name of a preterist theologian? I don't care anything about preterism for the same reason I don't care about Mormon theology. I have no interest in studying error.
Further, it is the nondispies who try to argue from history. Dispensationalism was SYSTEMATIZED by Darby. However, the doctrine of premillenialism and imminence were already known.