puros_bran
Member
Ever have one of those moments where you didn't know whether to laugh or cry?
I have read some versions where I believe the Spirit was practically yelling at me to close the book.... BUT (and I am strongly King James Preference) I don't see the issue with this particular verse. One can not be IN Jesus without walking in the Spirit. That is, if you are walking in the flesh you are not in Jesus.
Which way did the autograph read? Either way I don't see it as a change of meaning.
Paul practically repeats the statement in Galatians, which is both an argument that it should be in Rom 8:1 AND an argument that it was an added cross reference. People repeat certain phrases, for all we know Paul was fond of saying 'walk in the spirit' and wrote it all the time... but people also like to copy notes into their bibles (even the scribes) so maybe it was a cross reference saying, "look, this is what he is talking about when he says in Jesus."
I have read some versions where I believe the Spirit was practically yelling at me to close the book.... BUT (and I am strongly King James Preference) I don't see the issue with this particular verse. One can not be IN Jesus without walking in the Spirit. That is, if you are walking in the flesh you are not in Jesus.
Which way did the autograph read? Either way I don't see it as a change of meaning.
Paul practically repeats the statement in Galatians, which is both an argument that it should be in Rom 8:1 AND an argument that it was an added cross reference. People repeat certain phrases, for all we know Paul was fond of saying 'walk in the spirit' and wrote it all the time... but people also like to copy notes into their bibles (even the scribes) so maybe it was a cross reference saying, "look, this is what he is talking about when he says in Jesus."