• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Study 2 Thessalonians 2:13

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
It is very clear from the context, Paul is speaking of the beginning of the New covenant in 2 Thessalonians 2:13.

Paul elaborates on "how" the election for salvation is accomplished.

Clearly the Calvinist effort to transform the noun "salvation" into the verb "saved" is their effort to rewrite the verse to avoid its doctrinal teaching of conditional election, through faith in the truth.

And again, folks, note the effort to charge me with their malfeasance. That is all they have to offer...
And so we disagree on the “clear context” of 2 Thessalonians 2:13. The difference is, I just stick with words written to come to my conclusion. You must resort to “interpretive translation” to make your conclusion.

If you can point me to where I changed a noun (salvation) into a verb (saved? Is saved a verb?) then I will address it. Otherwise, you have introduced a red herring/straw man into the discussion as a way to deflect from your obvious error in using your “interpretive translation”.

What we have offered is scripture in context. What you have offered is an “interpretive translation” that changes the very words of scripture to fit your secular philosophy. If there is malfeasance in your presentation, then you have made it plain for all to see, not me.

Peace to you
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
That Paul is writing to believers (as he is in all his letters) is not at issue. However, the word 'covenant' (unless I have accidentally missed it), let alone 'new covenant' does not appear in the letter.
Are you suggesting that the exact words have to be there for those believers to be under the new covenant?

The fact that they are chosen in Him through faith establishes a start point of their salvation or do you think people are saved before they actually trust in God?

The words 'long ages ago' is not the best translation. The Greek is pro chronon aionion, 'before times eternal.'
I know that various translators will use different words to express the same concept. But what we do know is that God plan was set before creation.

This is the source of your misunderstanding, I think. Being chosen for salvation is not the same as being saved, just as being chosen for a prize is not the same as receiving the prize.
Christians were chosen for salvation long, long before they were saved through 'sanctification by the Spirit and beief in the truth.' But they were going to be saved, even though they needed to believe. The Holy Spirit set them apart and opened their hearts to believe the good news spoken to them by Paul.
No one was chosen for salvation prior to creation although the plan for how a person could be saved was.

Look at your words " they were going to be saved," was there ever the possibility that they would be lost? Not according to calvinist theory. So when you add "even though they needed to believe." it is meaningless as their faith or lack of would have no impact on their salvation.

The Holy Spirit sets those aside that have trusted in God not so they will trust in God.

No. We see nothing of the kind.
We are told the gospel is the power of God for salvation. So unless the Thessalonians were saved prior to Paul preaching the gospel to them we have to conclude that was what Paul is referring to as "from the beginning".

My apologies for this. I wrote the verse out rather than cutting and pasting it and unfortunately omitted the words in question. I always try to check what I write, but alas, not always accuratly :Frown However, that does not alter the meaning on Eph. 1:4, but rather expands it. We were chosen before the foundation of the world in Christ, 'Whose goings forth are from of old, from the days of eternity' (Micah 5:2, NKJV margin). We were chosen for Christ to redeem, but we were not redeemed until He redeemed us in time.
The whole world was chosen for Christ to redeem, that was why He came so that the world through Him might be saved. Joh 3:17

The plan was set in motion before creation. Christ is the means of salvation. Those that believe will be redeemed. God did not pick out a few select individuals before creation to be saved and the rest condemned as your view requires.

Yep! That's exactly right! :) Chosen in etenity, called, saved and sealed by the Spirit in time!
That is just you reading your calvinism into the text again.

You have to ignore way to many verses to hold to your calvinist theory of salvation for a pre selected few.

It is apparent that we see the scriptures differently so we will continue to disagree.

You via your view have God condemning the vast majority of mankind for no other reason than He did not pick them.

I see in scripture that the vast majority of mankind is condemned because they chose to reject the only means of salvation, faith in the God of creation.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Are you suggesting that the exact words have to be there for those believers to be under the new covenant?
Well, it would certainly help, wouldn't it? That believers are in the new covenant is not at issue. But if Paul wanted to talk about the new covenant, it seems to me that he would have used the word(s)
No one was chosen for salvation prior to creation although the plan for how a person could be saved was.
This is very interesting, isn't it?
The Bible says, 'God from the beginning chose you for salvation.'
Silverhair says, 'No one was chosen for salvation prior to creation.'

You via your view have God condemning the vast majority of mankind for no other reason than He did not pick them.
Rev. 7:9-10. 'After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could number, , of all nations, tribes, peoples and tongues, standing before the Lamb ...... and crying out with a loud voice, "Salvation belongs to our God who sits upon the throne, and to the Lamb."' God says that the number to be saved is so great that no one can number them. So exactly who are you to number them and find them not enough?

The conversation is getting too silly. It has reminded me why I decided not to get involved in these fruitless discussions. This is my last post here.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And so we disagree on the “clear context” of 2 Thessalonians 2:13. The difference is, I just stick with words written to come to my conclusion. You must resort to “interpretive translation” to make your conclusion.

If you can point me to where I changed a noun (salvation) into a verb (saved? Is saved a verb?) then I will address it. Otherwise, you have introduced a red herring/straw man into the discussion as a way to deflect from your obvious error in using your “interpretive translation”.

What we have offered is scripture in context. What you have offered is an “interpretive translation” that changes the very words of scripture to fit your secular philosophy. If there is malfeasance in your presentation, then you have made it plain for all to see, not me.

Peace to you
LOL, this poster sticks to the copy and paste dogma of the dark ages, as he appears to lack any ability to actually study
scripture.


Paul is speaking of the beginning of the New covenant in 2 Thessalonians 2:13. That conclusion is dictated by the context,

Paul elaborates on "how" the election for salvation is accomplished.

Clearly the Calvinist effort to transform the noun "salvation" into the verb "saved" is their effort to rewrite the verse to avoid its doctrinal teaching of conditional election, through faith in the truth.

For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth were realized through Jesus Christ. To be chosen through faith in the truth, is to be chosen through faith in Christ Jesus, as our savior, lord and God. This mystery was revealed and established by the New covenant in His blood.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
…….

Clearly the Calvinist effort to transform the noun "salvation" into the verb "saved" is their effort to rewrite the verse to avoid its doctrinal teaching of conditional election, through faith in the truth.
Show me where I did this or quit making a false allegation.

You have admitted to changing the words by posting your “interpretive translation”.

Now, you make false allegations that I have changed the words of the passage to deflect from your obvious error.

You are like clouds without rain, a horn that blows without hitting a solid note, always studying and never learning with a theology that is a mile wide and an 1/8th an inch deep.

All done now @Van, I’ll leave you to your latest failed attempt to change scripture to fit your secular philosophy.

Peace to you
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
Well, it would certainly help, wouldn't it? That believers are in the new covenant is not at issue. But if Paul wanted to talk about the new covenant, it seems to me that he would have used the word(s)
As I said before do you not think believers are under the new covenant?

This is very interesting, isn't it?
The Bible says, 'God from the beginning chose you for salvation.'
Silverhair says, 'No one was chosen for salvation prior to creation.'
No one was chosen for salvation prior to creation, that is just the false calvinist twisting of scripture. The word of God is your biggest problem.
Rom 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes
Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith
Rom 10:13 for "WHOEVER WILL CALL ON THE NAME OF THE LORD WILL BE SAVED."

God's plan from the beginning was that we would be saved by grace through faith in Him.

What is interesting is that you would think that calvinists were saved prior to creation. And then calvinists wonder why people reject their man-made theories.


Rev. 7:9-10. 'After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could number, , of all nations, tribes, peoples and tongues, standing before the Lamb ...... and crying out with a loud voice, "Salvation belongs to our God who sits upon the throne, and to the Lamb."' God says that the number to be saved is so great that no one can number them. So exactly who are you to number them and find them not enough?

The conversation is getting too silly. It has reminded me why I decided not to get involved in these fruitless discussions. This is my last post here.

When did I number those that would be saved, I left that to the calvinists. Your the ones that insist that God picked out all those that would be saved and that prior to creation.

It is odd how calvinists have to keep changing their views over time as they are shown just how hollow they are.

But since you have 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 etc point calvinists some hyper, some moderate, sovereign grace and the list just goes on. It is sad that they all cannot just believe the word of God and forget all those words of man that they hold to.

What gets silly is when you expect someone that believes the word of God to then accept the word of man.
 
Top