When I was growing up in a Baptist church, I was taught that "the Catholics" used "vain repetition" in their prayers and that was wrong because it lost it's meaning through familiarity and the perfunctory nature of the ritual.Yet point out to Baptists that most school kids rattle off the Pledge without a thought in the world and they get very upset and somehow think you're unpatriotic...
This is a good point. Also, your statement about whether we become unpatriotic if we don't say the pledge every day is also good. I think it's nothing short of some weird nationalistic pseudo sacrament.
By the way, I'm a teacher, but I abstain from the pledge, because my allegiance is to God alone. I'm not surprised that a whole country of indoctrinated, unregenerate people will claim this makes me unpatriotic and that I should move to Australia or that I'm a freaking liberal or something, but I am very surprised that evangelical Christians, who claim Christ deserves their supreme allegiance, often will repeat the same trite and spurious arguments.
If you're a Christian and you feel it is permissible to pledge, that is okay with me. It's between you and God. But I don't understand why most of us don't at least take this predicament seriously.
And, as a result, I think all students (and their parents) should have the option of abstaining both from the pledge and standing, which is just another show of homage.
It's a little aside, but I don't believe read prayers, even those read often, are necessarily "vain repetition." A lot of evangelical traditions do this, as well. It's no more vain repetition than a Baptist minister who says "forgive us for our sins and shortcomings" in every prayer or a music leader that says "we're just here to praise you, Jesus."
In fact, since read prayers keep us focused when our minds tend to wander, give a language to those who are struggling, and facilitate whole-group participation, I'd say there is nothing wrong with them.