"Targeting" and Soteriology

[Iconoclast]

fine.

Iconoclast, i am not concerned at all regarding my credibility in your eyes.

My "modis opporendi" is to have little concern regarding the approval of men, and to be extremely concerned with my heavenly fathers approval.

Its just the best way to live.

And i am going to choose to not post a scripture with that.

I'll let you find it all on your own.

not worthy of a response

 

[Alive in Christ]

I can just hear it now, when Iconoclast gets here...

(Cheerfully)..

Well, I see that the available *correction* that was offered has been rejected. However, Gods will has been accomplished in that the non-elect will suffer eternally as the consequence of our mercifull father blinding them.

:tonofbricks:

 

[Iconoclast]

Iconoclast...


It was late and I was kinda tired when posting my most recent posts to you. I meant to share this with you.

You keep saying you want scriptures.

Hmmm? Thats odd, because some time back I posted an entire page of scriptures, at your request, proving that men do indeed make freewill choices.

You basically ignored them.2ndly, why should I bother posting scriptures for you, when..when you DO comment... all you do is ((mangle them)). You absolutly butcher them. Goodness, its like watching ((ARCHIE BUNKER)) interpret the scriptures. I guess thats why you "copy/paste" so much. Personally, I prefer being "real", and post conversationally, from the heart, along with the scriptures

To each their own, I guess.

No need to lie AIC..... I showed how you misused each scripture. That is different from ignoring them. morseop said the same thing to you.
Listen.....until you are prepared to respond biblically....or want to learn, there is no point to this exchange.
I post good solid links , and confessional statements and have asked you several times to respond to them. You have failed to do so.
If you cannot that is one thing. But to keep making accusations without showing anything biblical is pathetic.

You absolutly butcher them. Goodness, its like watching ((ARCHIE BUNKER)) interpret the scriptures

Like last week when I showed you completely opposed pauls teaching that unsaved men are without hope in the world....you insisted it was the opposite. When I posted the verse ....your sad reply was...well there is only one verse that I showed you??????? As if God has to write something more than once. Remember this AIC.....you mangled scripture...more like you did not know the verse.... i would be patient and help but you do not want help...just trying to attack with imbecilic responses.
If someone is going to disagree biblical fine....but all this other nonsense is a time waster.

 

[Alive in Christ]

Iconoclast...


Thank you for your postings to me.

I appreciate you taking the time to do that.

 

[Catalyst]

OK you exegetic marvel. Show me your skills. What does 1 john 3:6 say. Show us how you would NOT use it and butcher it. Teach us obi wan.

No need to lie AIC..... I showed how you misused each scripture. That is different from ignoring them. morseop said the same thing to you.
Listen.....until you are prepared to respond biblically....or want to learn, there is no point to this exchange.
I post good solid links , and confessional statements and have asked you several times to respond to them. You have failed to do so.
If you cannot that is one thing. But to keep making accusations without showing anything biblical is pathetic.





Like last week when I showed you completely opposed pauls teaching that unsaved men are without hope in the world....you insisted it was the opposite. When I posted the verse ....your sad reply was...well there is only one verse that I showed you??????? As if God has to write something more than once. Remember this AIC.....you mangled scripture...more like you did not know the verse.... i would be patient and help but you do not want help...just trying to attack with imbecilic responses.
If someone is going to disagree biblical fine....but all this other nonsense is a time waster.