• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Actual KJV 1611

Status
Not open for further replies.

tyndale1946

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not really, its faux fake leather

No Bible is going to give you eternal life!... Not EVEN the KJV no matter what edition you use... The Holy Spirit is totally in the Salvation of any man... Don't argue with me argue with scripture... Don't own a 1611 but the KJV I do own, says this!

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Btw... I don't need another one, my KJV says ALL I need to know... Brother Glen:)
 

tyndale1946

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No Bible is going to give you eternal life!... Not EVEN the KJV no matter what edition you use... The Holy Spirit is totally in the Salvation of any man... Don't argue with me argue with scripture... Don't own a 1611 but the KJV I do own, says this!

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Btw... I don't need another one, my KJV says ALL I need to know... Brother Glen:)

Oh and I forgot one, the KJV Hendrickson Bibles (audio edition) read by Alexander Scourby... Best $50 bucks I ever spent!... Brother Glen:Thumbsup
 

AVL1984

<img src=../ubb/avl1984.jpg>
Which edition of the Kjv would be the perfect translation then? Would have to be just the 1611 by the KJVO logic!
And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oh look!
Yet another "let-me-soothe-my-guilty-conscience-by-educating-the-KJVO-neanderthals-about-the-mistakes-in-their-Bible" thread.
No power at all in that old black book, nope, none at all.
The "power" is in the Holy Spirit, who does not seem to have ANY problem saving sinners regardless if the Kjv is used or not in the preaching and teaching!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.
what gets me is that the 1611 team NEVER would have been KJVO, as they saw their 1611 as a revision of the older English versions, and expected others would revise and update their edition in future also!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.
God used the latin Vulgate a long time, was that also "inspired?"
 

AVL1984

<img src=../ubb/avl1984.jpg>
what gets me is that the 1611 tesam NEVER would have been KJVO, as they saw their 1611 as a revision of the older English versions, and expected others would revise and update their edition in future also!
You are absolutely correct. I don't believe they were KJVo either.
 

AVL1984

<img src=../ubb/avl1984.jpg>
God used the latin Vulgate a long time, was that also "inspired?"
I think we're pretty much in agreement that it was only PRESERVED! :) Just as the underlying texts for the other translations are PRESERVED, which one who holds the KJVO position will not accept or admit. If they're not "preserved" then why in the world are they still here?
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think we're pretty much in agreement that it was only PRESERVED! :) Just as the underlying texts for the other translations are PRESERVED, which one who holds the KJVO position will not accept or admit. If they're not "preserved" then why in the world are they still here?
Some say that MV are satanic, but why would satan be involved in any Bible that promotes the truths of the scriptures?
 

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.

Except that the NLT is more a paraphrase, and the HCSB, a more literal translation.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
I think we're pretty much in agreement that it was only PRESERVED! :) Just as the underlying texts for the other translations are PRESERVED, which one who holds the KJVO position will not accept or admit. If they're not "preserved" then why in the world are they still here?

Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick (i.e. "alive").
Your Bible is not just preserved, it's also inspired.
A mummy is preserved but it is not alive; nor can it give life.
Preservation without inspiration is as dead as a frog in formaldehyde or a mummy in a casket.
frogs in formaldehyde.jpg real mummy.jpg
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
On one KJVO board, I was warned for quoting out of the AV 1611 using the original spellings. And yet those paragons of erudition had "1611 KJV" in their title! (I was soon banned from that board, as I roundly denounced their KJVO myth, showing them the proof it's false. marking the 34th KJVO board i've been banned from. Very few of them are still functioning.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top