Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not really, its faux fake leatherwow, the Rolls Royce!![]()
Not really, its faux fake leather
No Bible is going to give you eternal life!... Not EVEN the KJV no matter what edition you use... The Holy Spirit is totally in the Salvation of any man... Don't argue with me argue with scripture... Don't own a 1611 but the KJV I do own, says this!
John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
Btw... I don't need another one, my KJV says ALL I need to know... Brother Glen![]()
the Salvation of any man
indeed, the entire human race!
SBG!... God makes up his own family... Now put a big G in front of race... Now do you get it?... Brother Glen![]()
And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.Which edition of the Kjv would be the perfect translation then? Would have to be just the 1611 by the KJVO logic!
The "power" is in the Holy Spirit, who does not seem to have ANY problem saving sinners regardless if the Kjv is used or not in the preaching and teaching!Oh look!
Yet another "let-me-soothe-my-guilty-conscience-by-educating-the-KJVO-neanderthals-about-the-mistakes-in-their-Bible" thread.
No power at all in that old black book, nope, none at all.
what gets me is that the 1611 team NEVER would have been KJVO, as they saw their 1611 as a revision of the older English versions, and expected others would revise and update their edition in future also!And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.
God used the latin Vulgate a long time, was that also "inspired?"And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.
You are absolutely correct. I don't believe they were KJVo either.what gets me is that the 1611 tesam NEVER would have been KJVO, as they saw their 1611 as a revision of the older English versions, and expected others would revise and update their edition in future also!
They saw their product as improving the prior translations, but not as either perfect or inspired!You are absolutely correct. I don't believe they were KJVo either.
I think we're pretty much in agreement that it was only PRESERVED!God used the latin Vulgate a long time, was that also "inspired?"
Some say that MV are satanic, but why would satan be involved in any Bible that promotes the truths of the scriptures?I think we're pretty much in agreement that it was only PRESERVED!Just as the underlying texts for the other translations are PRESERVED, which one who holds the KJVO position will not accept or admit. If they're not "preserved" then why in the world are they still here?
And this is where the KJVO's make one of their failed defenses.I have a dear friend who is KJVO, and I was raised KJVO, but I left that mess back in the 1990s. When they couldn't back up which edition of the versions was the inspired, preserved Word, and attacked instead of using their wits and the Bible to prove their point, that was enough for me. For me, it was a very liberating thing to find out that I wasn't lost just because I read out of other translations of the Bible. Even the English versions seem to vary in several points, and that's why I truly believe that we still have the preserved Word of God, whether it's in the KJV, NASB, or the NIV (which I'm not fond of). Our home church uses the HCSB. It's okay, and it goes well with my copy of the NLT, which we use in the Tuesday night men's Bible meetings we hold with the Cowboy Church.
Blessings.
The "power" is in the Holy Spirit, who does not seem to have ANY problem saving sinners regardless if the Kjv is used or not in the preaching and teaching!
I think we're pretty much in agreement that it was only PRESERVED!Just as the underlying texts for the other translations are PRESERVED, which one who holds the KJVO position will not accept or admit. If they're not "preserved" then why in the world are they still here?