Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
if Yom means more than a 24 hour day..
Was Jesus lying when he said God made man and female at the beginning?
No of course not.
and how old do you think the age of the earth is?
Hi Gettingitright, the issue is that many young people in high school or college when faced with the fact many if not essentially all of their teachers believe the earth is way older than 7000 years, lose faith in the validity of the Bible. OECreationists are attempting to show that the Bible is accurate in all it says, using differing assumptions. The war between YEC and OEC simply pushes young folks away.
What difference does it make? Earth is here. We are here. "Before the beginning of space and time, God created." Genesis 1:1.
As the Germans say, "Jetzt geht mir ein Licht auf!"
:wavey:
Yes ....... except for the witness of Scripture. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. Our high schools, colleges and universities teach that God never existed, that Jesus is not substantiated by credible secular evidence, and..... the Christian church is disintegrating.
raying:
Approximately 4.5 billion years.....4,500,000,000
Hi Gettingitright, the issue is that many young people in high school or college when faced with the fact many if not essentially all of their teachers believe the earth is way older than 7000 years, lose faith in the validity of the Bible. OECreationists are attempting to show that the Bible is accurate in all it says, using differing assumptions. The war between YEC and OEC simply pushes young folks away.
I wouldn't put it at this age, but I would say that creation appears to be hundreds of millions of years old.
The problem, the real problem with the Young Earth Creationist position is that it seeks to both deny credible scientific data from a time that we know a good deal about (namely the earth 8,000 years ago) and obfuscates what good data is out there.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a humanist scientistism proponent. Once you get into cosmology, the philosophy of origins, you are dealing with just that...philosophy. Science is, as a discipline, very helpful in dealing with observable matters. Cosmology is not observable and fraught with theories and speculation cast as proofs and concrete conclusions.
However, when one considers the actual observable data that is out there from multiple sources it is difficult (to downright nearly impossible) to postulate the earth and creation are only 8,000 years old. There's just too much that we know about that period.
So I tend to say this: Creation appears to be hundreds of millions of years old.
And I do add to this that I believe God creates with age built in.
I've always tried to look at the creation story like this:
From an old earth perspective, if God had instructed Moses to write of the creation including information like DNA, cellular division, organic adaptation, etc, then the people he was writing to would have likely discarded the text as gibberish. It would mean nothing to them. The Day-Age ideology about creation doesn't bother me.
From a young earth perspective, the Bible seems to indicate literal 24-hour cycles. The young earth ideology doesn't bother me.
I'll say this about both: God's word describes creation in the first two chapters of the Bible, but then spends the remainder of the text detailing how we should act toward one another, and about where we are headed as humanity. It stands to reason, then, that our destination is far more important to us than our origin.
I wouldn't put it at this age, but I would say that creation appears to be hundreds of millions of years old.
The problem, the real problem with the Young Earth Creationist position is that it seeks to both deny credible scientific data from a time that we know a good deal about (namely the earth 8,000 years ago) and obfuscates what good data is out there.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a humanist scientistism proponent. Once you get into cosmology, the philosophy of origins, you are dealing with just that...philosophy. Science is, as a discipline, very helpful in dealing with observable matters. Cosmology is not observable and fraught with theories and speculation cast as proofs and concrete conclusions.
However, when one considers the actual observable data that is out there from multiple sources it is difficult (to downright nearly impossible) to postulate the earth and creation are only 8,000 years old. There's just too much that we know about that period.
So I tend to say this: Creation appears to be hundreds of millions of years old.
And I do add to this that I believe God creates with age built in.
I am assuming that you do understand the science and mathematics behind the 13.7 billion year estimate for the age of the universe? You simply do not agree or think it is flawed?