Silverhair
Well-Known Member
No did you have a problem reading and understanding my response ?
No, did not, did you not understand the verses?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No did you have a problem reading and understanding my response ?
You are flat out denying what the verse says.Through faith. Ephesians 1:13, Romans 10:9-10
The shed blood avails nothing to the sinner if it is not applied to one through faith. His shed blood covered the sins of humanity but does not save anyone.
Okay so you should know what is upNo, did not, did you not understand the verses?
You are flat out denying what the verse says.
Okay so you should know what is up
I quite agree. That is what I wrote in my post above. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough.Without an understanding that Christ paid for ones sins there is no reason to believe in Christ.
Here, obviously, I disagree. I find a particular redemption in Scripture, but I am still assured that I am saved.A general redemption has to be understood from Scripture.
No.Are we to understand from your comments that God was actually being disingenuous when He said preach the gospel to all creatures Mark 16:15 and that He really does not desire all to come to repentance and be saved? 1 Timothy 2:3-4.
That is quite true.Note the wording of 1 Corinthians 2:14. It say “the natural man does not receive G1209 the things of the Spirit of God” it does not say that he can not know of them. Many people will hear the gospel message but will reject it for reasons only they know.
G1209
I am glad to see that you believe in prevenient grace. It is absolutely true that the Gospel goes out to all men, but it is equally true that unless God does a special work of grace in the heart of a sinner, he will not repent and believe, not because God prevents him, but because he has a wicked, unbelieving heart. See John 3:19 above.of the thing offered in speaking, teaching, instructing; to receive favorably, give ear to, embrace, make one's own, approve, not to reject
Thayer's Unabridged Greek - english Lexicon of the New Testament
To say that the sinner does not naturally receive the things of the Spirit of God is not to say that he cannot. Apart from divine enlightenment John 1:9, conviction John 16:8, and drawing John 12:32, no sinner would respond to the Gospel, but this enlightenment, conviction, and drawing is extended to every sinner Mark 16:15, 1 Timothy 2:3-4.
What one cannot do is to make the Scriptures mean the opposite of what they sayThe verse you have used, 1 Corinthians 2:14, for support of your view does not in fact do that but rather shows that man has the ability to make real choices.
You still denying the effectiveness of the blood of Christ. That's not good friendThrough faith. Ephesians 1:13, Romans 10:9-10
The shed blood avails nothing to the sinner if it is not applied to one through faith. His shed blood covered the sins of humanity but does not save anyone.
Sounds like you lost your train of thoughtDid you loose your train of thought and not complete your sentence?
No.
That is quite true.
John 3:19. "And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil."
I am glad to see that you believe in prevenient grace. It is absolutely true that the Gospel goes out to all men, but it is equally true that unless God does a special work of grace in the heart of a sinner, he will not repent and believe, not because God prevents him, but because he has a wicked, unbelieving heart. See John 3:19 above.
What one cannot do is to make the Scriptures mean the opposite of what they say
'The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God' cannot be made to mean
'The natural man sometimes does receive the things of the Spirit of God.'
You still denying the effectiveness of the blood of Christ. That's not good friend
Particular redemption should never be confused with the general redemption. Again without the general redemption no one can even know if one has any part in the particular redemption. The Scripture teaches both.Here, obviously, I disagree. I find a particular redemption in Scripture, but I am still assured that I am saved.
You still don't believe in the saving properties of the blood Heb 9:14While the blood of Christ covered the sins of all mankind we are saved by His resurrection. 1 Corinthians 15:17 "...if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins!" I understand what the blood of Christ did and did not accomplish. The real question is, do you?
You still don't believe in the saving properties of the blood Heb 9:14
How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
I do not do so.Particular redemption should never be confused with the general redemption.
And here we disagree, but the points have been made on both sides so many times that I see no benefit in rehearsing them again. You asked for a text showing how unsaved people come to an assurance of salvation and I gave you one (post #115).Again without the general redemption no one can even know if one has any part in the particular redemption. The Scripture teaches both.
In order to have a reason to believe Christ paid for one sins to believe in Him.You asked for a text showing how unsaved people come to an assurance of salvation and I gave you one (post #115).
Now that requires the understanding of that being a general redemption.For example, Romans 5:1-11, especially v.8.. 'But God demonstrates His own love towards us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us,' If one believes that, and the surrounding verses, then one should have perfect assurance..
This thread will be closed no sooner than 430 am EDT (Wed) / 0130 am PDT (Wed)