Not according to the Bible.
There is not ONE text in the NT or OT that says that "they meet EVERY week-day-1 for gospel teaching" but we DO have that for Sabbath in Acts 18:4-6.
There is not ONE text in the NT or OT that says "they met week-day-1 after week-day-1 " for anything - but we DO have that in Acts 13 and Acts 17 regarding Sabbath.
There is not ONE text in the NT or OT saying "the Son of man is LORD of week day 1" but we DO have that in the NT for the SABBATH in Mark 2:28.
There is not ONE text in the NT saying "there REMAINS therefore a week-day 1 rest for the people of God" but we DO have that for SABBATH in Heb 4.
2. Gal 4 condemns even ONE observation of the pagan holy days -
3. Jer 31:31-33 and Heb 8:6-10 says that the NEW COVENANT is only with "house of Israel and the house of Judah" --- yep - I am a NEW COVENANT Christian - is this were you tell us that you reject the NEW Covenant??
You have to give the detail before you can claim sola scriptura, and you have to give more detail than to just claim that the Bible says: "There is no God," as it does in Psalm 14:1.
Here is what I am going to do with your post.
Since sola scriptura is only valid when context is taken into consideration, and the context here is the believers of the NT, I am going back to your post and wipe out all OT scripture, for they don't speak of the NT believer. That is step one.
Now that makes your post smaller.
What does your first reference talk about? Acts 18:4-6?
Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
5 And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit, and testified to the Jews that Jesus was Christ.
6 And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles.
--This was the nature of Paul's missionary journeys. He went to the Jews first, and then to the Greeks (Gentiles). He was a Jew by birth, a Rabbi, a Pharisee of the Pharisees, and through this background he often had an opportunity to speak in a synagogues. He took advantage of the opportunities that God gave him. Inevitably the preaching of the gospel in a synagogue got him kicked out. You should see that from verse 6 Thus he goes to the Gentiles, and it does not say which day he continues to teach them, for now it really doesn't matter. The Jews gathered on the Sabbath, and that is why he went there. He took the opportunity that God gave him. He went to the Jew first and then to the Gentile.
--But you are not a Jew, are you? Do you go into the Jewish synagogues and preach the gospel Bob?
Then you make this statement:
There is not ONE text in the NT or OT that says "they met week-day-1 after week-day-1 " for anything - but we DO have that in Acts 13 and Acts 17 regarding Sabbath.
In Acts 13 Paul and Barnabas set out in their first missionary journey.
What did they do?
Acts 13:5 And when they were at Salamis, they preached the word of God in the synagogues of the Jews: and they had also John to their minister.
--Hmm. I wonder when the people met in those synagogues? Care to offer a guess?
The Jews were now practicing a false religion, the religion of Judaism. The keeping of the Sabbath was part of a false religion, just like the keeping of Friday is for the Muslims. He uses that day to preach to them because that is the day that they gathered together, and Paul has opportunity to preach to them. It was not "Paul's personal practice" as a Christian. It was the practice of the Jews.
In chapter 18 Paul comes to Corinth. What does he do here?
Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
--He preaches in the synagogues to the Jews until he gets kicked out. We see later that the Corinthian church begins to meet on the first day of the week. The unsaved Jews met on the sabbath. But once they were saved (1Cor.16:2), they met on the first day of the week. Bob, you are ignoring context, and thus ignoring sola scriptura which takes into consideration all the Bible, not just your favorite parts.
I see it was chapter 17 you had mentioned. Doesn't matter. His practice was the same:
Acts 17:1 Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews:
2 And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures,
--His manner or practice was to go into the synagogues on the Sabbath days when the Jews gathered together and preach the gospel to them.
--Do you go to the synagogues to preach the gospel to the unsaved Jew, Bob?
Then your comparison is not valid.
Your next objection:
There is not ONE text in the NT or OT saying "the Son of man is LORD of week day 1" but we DO have that in the NT for the SABBATH in Mark 2:28.
What objection is here? Every day is holy. Christ is Lord of all, isn't he? Is he your Lord? There is no command here to keep the Sabbath. Clearly.
Your next objection:
There is not ONE text in the NT saying "there REMAINS therefore a week-day 1 rest for the people of God" but we DO have that for SABBATH in Heb 4.
The rest in Heb.4 is Christ Himself. He is not speaking of a day, but rather of Christ.
Hebrews 4:5 And in this place again, If they shall
enter into my rest.
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and
I will give you rest.
--There is no day here. If one has not entered into Christ's rest they have no salvation.
Christ is our rest; Christ is our Sabbath. Every preceding sabbath that ever was, was simply a shadow of Christ, the real Sabbath to come. (Col.2:17).
Next objection:
2. Gal 4 condemns even ONE observation of the pagan holy days -
Galatians 4:10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.
--These refer to Jewish feasts and their sabbath days in particular. This verse condemns your position of the observance of the sabbath along with Col.2:17. The keeping of the Sabbath has now become as a pagan feast day. It is part of a pagan religion, which is Judaism, a religion which denies that Christ is the true Messiah.
William MacDonald says this which I agree with:
4:10, 11
The Galatians were observing the Jewish calendar with its Sabbaths, its festivals, and seasons. Paul expresses fear for those who profess to be Christians, yet seek to find favor with God by legal observances. Even unregenerate people can observe days and months and years. It gives some people intense satisfaction to feel there is something they can do in their own strength to win God's smile. But this implies that man has some strength, and hence, to that extent, he does not need the Savior.
If Paul could write in this manner to the Galatians, what would he write to professing Christians today who are seeking to attain holiness by legal observances? Would he not condemn the traditions brought into Christianity from Judaism—a humanly ordained priesthood, distinctive vestments for the priest, Sabbath-keeping, holy places, candles, holy water, and so forth?
And lastly:
3. Jer 31:31-33 and Heb 8:6-10 says that the NEW COVENANT is only with "house of Israel and the house of Judah" --- yep - I am a NEW COVENANT Christian - is this were you tell us that you reject the NEW Covenant??
Heb.8:7 sums this up nicely:
Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
--But now there is no place for the first covenant for the second covenant has taken its place. The Sabbath Day is no longer to be kept. The teaching is quite clear here. It seems as if you haven't studied this chapter at all.