DHK
MONSTER STRAWMAN ALERT
1. Not everything in the Bible IS redemptive history.
Did I say this? Did I say EVERYTHING in the bible is redemptive history?
let me look...maybe I said it and do not remember saying it...let's see what I said-
Here is what I said;
Everything in redemptive history is relevant.
I did not say anything about everything "in the Bible' being redemptive history, did I?
So in this supposed response...you want me to interact with a premise I never stated or believed?
2. Not everything in the Bible IS relevant to regeneration.
Tell me how 1Chron.26:18 is relative?
1Ch 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.
Did I say EVERYTHING in the bible is relevant to "regeneration"....let's ;look once again;
I was answering your misguided statement.....you said-
Quote:
Then you mention some miracles, supernatural miracles done by Christ and a couple of the apostles how the dead were raised. You take a terrible leap and somehow say that these miracles are related to regeneration. How?
I answered;
The miracles all speak of Gods work in salvation...death to life, unable to able, blind to sight...that's how.
You call this...A "terrible leap"......
death to life.......lazarus come forth
unable to able.....to the man with the withered hand....he commanded him to stretch forth his hand....the very thing he was unable to do
blind to sight I once was blind, now I see....
Sinners are described as ....dead....unable....blind.....each miracle shows how God can enable and do what we cannot in and of our self.
You sound like these skeptics found here in mark 2;
Miracles did credential the person as sent by the Father...but sin and salvation was the focus...I
do not think Jesus took what you refer to as a 'terrible leap".
2 And again he entered into Capernaum after some days; and it was noised that he was in the house.
2 And straightway many were gathered together, insomuch that there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the door: and he preached the word unto them.
3 And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four.
4 And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.
5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy,
Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.
6 But there was certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts,
7 Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?
8 And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these things in your hearts?
9 Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?
10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)
11 I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way into thine house.
12 And immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went forth before them all; insomuch that they were all amazed, and glorified God, saying, We never saw it on this fashion.
I didn't know you were keeping count.
I keep a rough count...perhaps I will look it up...I know how much you like to stand by what you post....
here you did to SG;
Quote:
I have showed you with equal authority that you don't have the authority or omniscience of God.
When did I ever lay that claim, monsieur?
:laugh: you do it so often no one thinks twice about it:thumbs:here is another;
Quote
HK said
Here you have a prophecy of Israel entering into the Promised Land not yet fulfilled--a Kingdom promise. It is not relevant.
This has nothing to do with what I previously posted.
Here you charge this against Protestant....
God is just and fair. That is his nature. Even Abraham said:
"Shall not the God of all the earth do right (be just and fair)?"
You seem to deny this truth, and his attribute of justice and fairness to mankind. He gave to man the characteristic of justice and fairness, and made man in the image of God. But you make God into a cruel monster after the image of Calvin. That truly is sad.
And the truth is protestant has not said this anywhere...this is coming from your mind and your mind alone.....Show a post where he said this...go ahead
We do have Catholics on this board you know. Remember where this thread is located. It is not in the Calvinist forum.
Isn't that all the more reason you should not engage in this kind of poor conduct?
Secondly, what was done is called eisegesis. You can do anything you want; draw any conclusion you want with eisegesis
.
There is no eisegesis at all...just application of biblical teaching, but if someone cannot see it...they remain blind to it.....
He did by inference. But you do it more than he does it.
This so called inference is your evil imagination as I do not see any evidence of this so called inference....Can you show it...we will wait..post where he inferred what you claim...
SG can't prove that through the Scriptures and never has. So save your applause.
SG has answered you quite easily and made mincemeat out of your posting:applause:
God does not give his spiritual fruit to the unregenerate. He does not give his spiritual gifts to the unsaved. The gift of faith is listed alongside the gift of healing, the gift of miracles, etc. Do the unregenerate practice those gifts as well? In no way do the unregenerate receive the fruit of the Spirit or the gifts of the Spirit. It is as unbiblical a concept as one could ever dig up.
No one is talking about that so this once again is a dishonest attempt to back out of what you have said several times.....
The gift of salvation...ie, saving faith, repentance, life from the dead is given by God to unregenerate persons...that is how they become regenerate...no one is speaking about the fruit of the Spirit, or subsequent spiritual gifts.