timtofly
Well-Known Member
Moses who was not the author of the book of Genesis as he was not an eye witness but merely edited the existing documents into Genesis, was an eye witness to the Law Covenant and he documented its 613 provisions.
Moses was a witness to all he wrote. He is one of God's witnesses. We know that Moses showed up in the NT and met the disciples Peter, James, and John. If he witnesses the end of The Law, there is no problem witnessing the book of Genesis. Now we know that two other men met Abraham with Jesus, why would Moses declare one of them was him? It would have needed too much explanation. But just ruling out the incident seems to be missing the point. He also met up with Elijah. How can one just claim about dozens of covenants and then dismiss the source of those very words as not witnessing each moment? I doubt covenants had much priority else Moses would have, even as an editor, a neat concise list of covenants someplace in one of the Books? No, I am not saying a covenant is not important for the one God is dealing with. It was not that Moses was not without first hand experiences, it is he only wrote what God wanted, to be placed in the Bible.