Believers are "heirs of the kingdom" (Jas. 2.5). Where do the scriptures ever state that we are heirs of the church?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Believers are "heirs of the kingdom" (Jas. 2.5). Where do the scriptures ever state that we are heirs of the church?
Looking more intently at what the "Kingdom of Heaven" is, brings to life what it means that it was "at hand"
I Corinthians 15:24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
No it doesn't we are the ecclesia (the called out) of darkness to the beautiful kingdom of his Son... And you are claiming the kingdom was never set up and it is... You are saying there is a parenthesis in the scripture where one does not exist... The legs of Daniel 2:44 the legs are made of Iron and further down the iron is mixed with clay but it is the same Iron... It is the same Empire... The Roman Empire... An empire governed by kIng's' and emperor's who called themselves gods and governed men by their laws. God set up his kingdom (the church) governed by Gods laws, not only that he gave us his written word The Holy Bible to teach those who claim his name how to treat others and our fellow man. I'm subject to a Heavenly King and I am I'm in a kingdom on this earth waiting for the Eternal Heavenly Kingdom to come and my Lord to take me home... Enough said... Brother Glen
Don't expect the anti-'spiritualizers' to seriously consider this aspect of the kingdom. If it's not tangible to the physical senses it's not real.
These same anti-'spiritualizers' have shut off to themselves the fact that at Christ's next coming He has reigned already and the kingdom has been already. They're looking for a kingdom of this world. One that can be seen with the eye and touched with the hand. You know, like the Jews of Christ's day.
No one believes that.
You still have not even shown from Scripture how you consistently justify this "next coming" of which you speak.
my Premillennial position
Okay, I'll rephrase:
"These same anti-'spiritualizers' have shut off to themselves the fact that at Christ's second coming He has reigned already and the kingdom has been already. They're looking for a kingdom of this world. One that can be seen with the eye and touched with the hand. You know, like the Jews of Christ's day."
I am not a Dispensationalist. I have made that clear.Dispy?
The church is not the kingdom. Do you really believe Jesus was instructing his disciples to pray for the coming of the ecclesia (Mt. 6.10)?
We have been translated into the kingdom of his dear Son (Col. 1.13). We were also chosen in him before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1.4), but we were not "in him" before the foundation of the world. "Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me." (Ro. 16.7)
I am claiming what Daniel and John claimed: "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever." (Da. 2.44) "And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast." (Rev. 17.12) Like you stated, "[F]urther down the iron is mixed with clay..."
The apostles were with Jesus during his entire ministry, and he was with them after his resurrection. "When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?" (Ac. 1.6) What was his reply? "And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power." (Ac. 1.7) According to most, he should have said, "You have it all wrong! Steve Gregg is going to write Revelation: Four Views in 1997 (Revised and Updated in 2013), and that will clear it up for you." You base your faith on writings of men who walked and talked with Jesus even after his resurrection but still have no understanding. Of all that Jesus taught concerning the kingdom, were they still clueless? Apparently, you are okay with that. I am not.
"And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear." (Lk. 19.11)
"He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return" (Lk. 19.12)
You can call it a "parenthesis" if you want to. I will just go with what scripture states.
At "his appearing and his kingdom" (2 Tim. 4.1), the Lord Jesus Christ will reign on earth with his saints (Rev. 5.10; 20.4). After his reign, before he delivers up the kingdom, he will have reigned and abolished all rule, authority, and power. Will that be visible?
The Kingdom is the rule and reign of God, so does he not rule/reign outside of the church itself still?The church is part of it, but not all of it!And if the kingdom of God is the church, and it is supposed to consume all other kingdoms, you have some work to do. Since Mt. 28.19 is fulfilled, you have a big problem. But God's elect are going to be saved whether they hear or believe anyway, right? As of 1995, there were 64,000 Primitive Baptists. Of course, that is by name and does not include the majority you would re-baptize because they did not meet the criteria your church or association (unbiblical) set up for a "valid" baptism. I would say you have a big problem.