The KJV and The Holy Spirit

[Alan Gross]

Dr. E.W. Bullinger's Figures of Speech, pg. 534,
calls "that holy thing", there in Luke 1:35, a "Heterosis of Gender".

THIRD DIVISION.
FIGURES INVOLVING CHANGE*

I. AFFECTING THE MEANING and USAGE OF WORDS.
HETEROSIS: or Exchange of Accidence.

VII. Heterosis of Gender.
"4. The Neuter for the Masculine or Feminine."

No, he does not! Bullinger died on June 6, 1913. The word Heterosis first appears in print in 1914.

So. As you researched the world of literary publications to reach the conclusion that "The word Heterosis first appears in print in 1914", did you also include clicking the referenced link provided? Are you sure?

I read the referenced page (page 534) in Bullinger’s book and saw for myself that the quote, "Heterosis of Gender", does not appear on the page.

Nobody said it did.

The classification heading VII. Heterosis of Gender is on the previous page.

VII. Heterosis of Gender. Page 533.
"4. The Neuter for the Masculine or Feminine." Page 534.

That's the way we do things. That's the plan.

Maybe that might work better for you(?) Dunno.

Moreover, heterosis is a biological term rather than a grammatical term...

What about that. What'll they think of next, do you suppose?

... and the expression, “Heterosis of Gender”, makes no sense.

What do you know. Son of a gun. You don't say.

There is nothing more important to me than the truth, but unfortunately, some people passionately hate the truth.

Strong work.

Thorough investigation.

Don't you hate it, though?

Something just doesn't make any sense.

 

[Logos1560]

YOU ALWAYS MISREPRESENT MY BELIEFS AS KJV-ONLY, IN A JADED WAY.

KJV-Only is what you label a strawman, to be a soft touch for your fake games.

Your claims are not true. There are no fake games in my stating the truth. You fail to demonstrate that I misrepresent your views. You have misrepresented my view over and over as you made false accusations that bear false witness. You have not corrected your false accusations and strawman misrepresentations.

I accurately present your own stated beliefs concerning the KJV, and it is not in a jaded way.

I accurately and soundly use the term KJV-only according to a clear sound definition and explanation of the term.

You try to create a strawman misrepresentation of the correct meaning of the accurate term KJV-only.

 

[Logos1560]

Now, you start quoting your KJV-Only Ruckmanites that you always do, .

Not true. You then quoted where I quoted D. A. Waite, and he is not a Ruckmanite. Are you bearing false witness against D. A. Waite?

D. A. Waite, Phil Stringer, David Cloud, Kirk DiVietro, H. D. Williams, David Sorenson, and several other KJV-only authors that I quote oppose Peter Ruckman's views. They are KJV-only without being followers of Peter Ruckman as many people are.

When KJV-only authors make a similar claim, I accurately quote together their related assertions, but that does not mean that they would agree on all points in other of their varying KJV-only arguments.