The LGBTQ want your kids - Wisconsin Current Event

[canadyjd]

It is clear you are not listening and instead have a huge prejudice that will not hear me.
Feel free to hold your opinion, but know you are wrong.

Please explain my “huge prejudice”? Because I don’t support grooming children for sexual exploitation you believe I have a “huge prejudice”?

I am not “wrong” on this issue. Your political liberalism is blinding you to common sense.

If you want to start a thread about how Christians should treat sinners, I’ll be happy to post.

But your continuous attacks on Christians confronting the evil of the trans propaganda being pushed in schools is WRONG!!!

peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

…..
Sadly, I have seen many pedophiles who attend very conservative, fundamentalist, churches…..

Please provide the details of the “many pedophiles” you have seen in “very conservative, fundamentalists churches”

When did you see them? Which churches? Did you report them to police? Did you catch them abusing children? How did you know they were pedophiles? What did you do when you saw them?

Or… did you just make it up to attack Christians that oppose grooming children for sexual exploitation in our schools?

Just saw another report of pre-schoolers being taught colors with pro-trans flash cards, one depicting a pregnant man.

Do you think that’s appropriate?? to expose pre-school children to such things?

peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

There are silent perverts in churches. Your conservative pride blinds you to the danger inside your church…..

Since you know so much about my church, please tell me who the “silent perverts” are?

Or… are you just making a slanderous claim to justify your attacks on Christians that opppse grooming children for sexual e ploitstiin in our schools.

Based on your posts so far, I’m sure it’s the latter.

peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

Candy…
The fact that you label me a leftist is purely because you are ignorant of who I am….

I am only aware of your posts. You follow the radical liberal leftest playbook for debate on this issue….

1. Never engage the merits of the argument. You know it’s wrong, so minimize it and focus on attacking the person.

2. Attack the person’s character: You did this when you claim we are fearful, homophobic and transphobic. A phobia is an irrational fear. You also claimed I was evil, and would do far more harm to my children than teachers.

3. Attack the person’s faith: You did this you claimed we were “faithless, not walking with Jesus, not trusting God, unable to fathom loving sinners.

4. Attack the person’s associates: You did this when you claimed you “know many pedophiles in conservatives churches, and claimed there were silent perverts among the congregations preying on our children.

5. Attack the person’s intelligence: You did this when you claimed you were an “intelligent conservative” not a “rednecked conservative”

6. Play the moral relevance card: You did this when you said homosexuals and trans were “sinners”, but I was “evil”, and presented the memorial of your friend as a loving fellowship where all were pointed to Christ, and then claimed I cannot fathom loving sinners.

Bottom line, your posts are always attacks and ridicule of those opposing the trans propaganda in our schools.

Like the saying goes… if you walk, talk and post like a radical liberal leftest, you are a radical liberal leftest.

peace to you

 

[AustinC]

Since you know so much about my church, please tell me who the “silent perverts” are?

Or… are you just making a slanderous claim to justify your attacks on Christians that opppse grooming children for sexual e ploitstiin in our schools.

Based on your posts so far, I’m sure it’s the latter.

peace to you

Matthew 7:15-23
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will recognize them by their fruits. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

Romans 16:17-20
I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive. For your obedience is known to all, so that I rejoice over you, but I want you to be wise as to what is good and innocent as to what is evil. The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.

Candy, we are aware of the enemy in the world. It is easy to spot. The danger is the enemy that has infiltrated the church and lurks among the body. Pay attention my friend.

Also, pray that God gives you better comprehension skills regarding what you read when I write. It seems your prejudice is getting in the way.

 

[AustinC]

I am only aware of your posts. You follow the radical liberal leftest playbook for debate on this issue….

1. Never engage the merits of the argument. You know it’s wrong, so minimize it and focus on attacking the person.

2. Attack the person’s character: You did this when you claim we are fearful, homophobic and transphobic. A phobia is an irrational fear. You also claimed I was evil, and would do far more harm to my children than teachers.

3. Attack the person’s faith: You did this you claimed we were “faithless, not walking with Jesus, not trusting God, unable to fathom loving sinners.

4. Attack the person’s associates: You did this when you claimed you “know many pedophiles in conservatives churches, and claimed there were silent perverts among the congregations preying on our children.

5. Attack the person’s intelligence: You did this when you claimed you were an “intelligent conservative” not a “rednecked conservative”

6. Play the moral relevance card: You did this when you said homosexuals and trans were “sinners”, but I was “evil”, and presented the memorial of your friend as a loving fellowship where all were pointed to Christ, and then claimed I cannot fathom loving sinners.

Bottom line, your posts are always attacks and ridicule of those opposing the trans propaganda in our schools.

Like the saying goes… if you walk, talk and post like a radical liberal leftest, you are a radical liberal leftest.

peace to you

LOL, are you being serious or is this just a big joke you're playing? Truly you are blind in this matter. Good day. I am done arguing with you as you cannot see.

 

[canadyjd]

Matthew 7:15-23…

Also, pray that God gives you better comprehension skills regarding what you read when I write. It seems your prejudice is getting in the way.

You should pray God gives you the ability to speak plainly and support what you claimed to have “seen”.

You said you have “seen many pedophiles” in conservative churches. If that is true, provide the details of those encounters. How did you know they were pedophiles and what did you do when you saw them?

If seems your radical liberal leftest ideology is getting in the way of simple answers; if you really have “seen” many pedophiles in conservative churches.

peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

LOL, are you being serious or is this just a big joke you're playing? Truly you are blind in this matter. Good day. I am done arguing with you as you cannot see.

So says the man following the radical liberal leftest playbook for debate.

Final play: Once you have been thoroughly defeated, claim the other guy is too stupid to understand your brilliant “conservative intelligence” arguments and run away.

peace to you

 

[AustinC]

So says the man following the radical liberal leftest playbook for debate.

Final play: Once you have been thoroughly defeated, claim the other guy is too stupid to understand your brilliant “conservative intelligence” arguments and run away.

peace to you

LOL, what I notice is anytime someone calls on the redneck right to check themselves at the door, the redneck right labels that person a leftist so that they can avoid looking inward. This thread is a perfect example of that observation. Thank you for showing everyone how incapable of introspection you are.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

As this thread has gone into the ditch, it is closed.