I think he means in context...dealing with the topicWe have produced MULTIPLE passages that you disagree with. What a surprise.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I think he means in context...dealing with the topicWe have produced MULTIPLE passages that you disagree with. What a surprise.
I think he means in context...dealing with the topic
I disagree with your interpretation and application of those proof texts, yes.We have produced MULTIPLE passages that you disagree with. What a surprise.
Skan,
I have made my case to you more than once on this topic. I am going to practice good consonant and vowel conservation by refusing to restate my position over again.
Wise approach on your part... When you don't have a case to make pretend your already made it and move on... :smilewinkgrin:
Restating your dogma's talking points while listing the same proof texts over and over is not a debate, its a diatribe. This is a debate forum yet he will not engage in a debate. He presents his interpretations of a particular text then I rebut with questions and arguments that he (and you now) divert attention away from by pretending like you've already defended your position.he made the case several times over....
Restating your dogma's talking points [/B]while listing the same proof texts over and over is not a debate,[
.This is a debate forum yet he will not engage in a debate
Yes...quite well and oftenHe presents his interpretations of a particular text
You do try..but we deal in scripture...not reasonings .semantics and philosophy. The scriptures are the answer....Then I rebut with questions and arguments
that he (and you now) divert attention away from by pretending like you've already defended your position.
You ASSUME that men are born unable to respond willingly to God's gospel
appeal using verses that don't discuss men's abilities in light of the gospel.
You use verses that talk about men's inability to submit to God law to support your contention that men are likewise unable to trust in Christ, the one who fulfilled the law for us because we couldn't.
The major mistake of Calvinistic reasoning is that you all take the biblical teaching of man's inability to attain righteousness by law and apply it to your erroneous and unfounded belief that men must be equally unable to attain righteousness by faith.
Wise approach on your part... When you don't have a case to make pretend your already made it and move on... :smilewinkgrin:
Restating your dogma's talking points while listing the same proof texts over and over is not a debate, its a diatribe.
Says you, the man who never offers his own exegesis.
Do you know why we keep stating the same thing over and over again? Because it is truth. You try to earn debate points by dismissing the truth and replacing it with cute little zingers like calling it a "diatribe". It is difficult to critique your position because you never state it; or at least you never offer exegetical proof for it. When I look at what you write I can only conclude that the emperor has no clothes.
The gospel is God's way of seperating His sheep from the goats. It's the call of reconciliation. The sheep run to Him and are reconciled, and the goats flee from it, having no desire for it.
Yes Willis.These verses are often misunderstood....
18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself,
Many stop here and say see...God was In Christ reconciling the WORLD as if it meant every single person...but just read the rest of the verse and it gives clarity.......
not imputing their trespasses unto them;
This is only true of those elect sheep who are savingly drawn by the gospel call from the preached word.
their sins are not imputed to them
...as they are reconciled in Christ...
the unsaved answer for all their sins...not having a High Priest or substitute.
In another post you mentioned a key truth...Jesus as surety..he is the guarantee as he has gone beyond the vail on our behalf as our Great Eternal High Priest...who ever lives to make intercession for us. he also reconciles sheep in all the world...that is why missionaries go...
52 And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad.
all over the world...everyone believing
and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.
Calvinists presume that people have no control over whether they are a sheep or a goat.
That men have no say in their future. No hope.
That is simply one of the most unbiblical doctrines the world has ever known...and dangerous IMO. Calvinists make this mistake with many of scripture's analogies, not just sheep and goats.
another passage you missFor example, how many times have you heard a Calvinist quote Rom. 9 about the vessels made for noble purpose or common use as proof text for the exact same thing as you are doing with sheep and goats above?
You all quote these verses as if mankind has nothing to do with being a vessel used for good or not. Just like you quote your sheep and goat proof texts with the assumption that men have no decision in the matter. But the bible is very clear that we do have a part to play in this, and that the Calvinistic application of these analogies is simply untrue.
For instance, read 2 Tim 2:20, where Paul refers to his same vessel analogy: "In a large house there are articles not only of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay; some are for noble purposes and some for ignoble. 21 If a man cleanses himself from the latter, he will be an instrument for noble purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work."
See that?
Don't make the mistake of Calvinists by giving all unbelievers in our world the perfect excuse for their unbelief. "I was born a goat, unloved by my creator, rejected from birth, a vessel for ignoble use, an object of wrath, without hope." What better excuse for being an unbeliever and an enemy of God is there than that? You are GIVING THEM that excuse and it is a lie. It is not true. They are LOVED BY GOD (Jn 3:16), He wants them to repent and be saved (1 Pet. 3:9), He holds out his hands to them with patience (Rm. 10:32), He reveals himself to them clearly so they can understand (Rm 1), so they have NO EXCUSES!
:thumbsup::applause::thumbsup: Case closed....
:smilewinkgrin: For you and those of your theological persuasion perhaps.
Willis,
You are making the age old mistake of proof texting. Pulling verses from their context to apply them to your particular doctrinal point, regardless of the original intent.
Calvinists presume that people have no control over whether they are a sheep or a goat. That men have no say in their future. No hope. That is simply one of the most unbiblical doctrines the world has ever known...and dangerous IMO. Calvinists make this mistake with many of scripture's analogies, not just sheep and goats.
For example, how many times have you heard a Calvinist quote Rom. 9 about the vessels made for noble purpose or common use as proof text for the exact same thing as you are doing with sheep and goats above?
You all quote these verses as if mankind has nothing to do with being a vessel used for good or not. Just like you quote your sheep and goat proof texts with the assumption that men have no decision in the matter. But the bible is very clear that we do have a part to play in this, and that the Calvinistic application of these analogies is simply untrue.
For instance, read 2 Tim 2:20, where Paul refers to his same vessel analogy: "In a large house there are articles not only of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay; some are for noble purposes and some for ignoble. 21 If a man cleanses himself from the latter, he will be an instrument for noble purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work."
See that? Same exact analogy as the one in Rom. 9, yet here he validates the non-Calvinistic interpretation by showing that men do have a decision that effects the type of vessel they will become, just as men have a decision to enter in the gate to become a part of his flock.
Don't make the mistake of Calvinists by giving all unbelievers in our world the perfect excuse for their unbelief. "I was born a goat, unloved by my creator, rejected from birth, a vessel for ignoble use, an object of wrath, without hope." What better excuse for being an unbeliever and an enemy of God is there than that? You are GIVING THEM that excuse and it is a lie. It is not true. They are LOVED BY GOD (Jn 3:16), He wants them to repent and be saved (1 Pet. 3:9), He holds out his hands to them with patience (Rm. 10:32), He reveals himself to them clearly so they can understand (Rm 1), so they have NO EXCUSES!