SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
You, you you on display. This is all they have, folks, absurdity followed in personal attacks. Got it?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You, you you on display. This is all they have, folks, absurdity followed in personal attacks. Got it?
The gospel had not been presented or presented in a way they understood
All these are among the soil #1 type of Matthew 13.or, as Jesus says in Matthew 13:19, "When anyone hears the word of the kingdom, and does not understand it, then the wicked one comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart. This is he who received seed by the wayside"
or, as Paul says in 2 Cor. 4:4, "whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them"
And Paul again, 2 Thess. 2:10-12, "and with every wicked deception directed against those who are perishing, because they refused the love of the truth that would have saved them. For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie, in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness."
I'm glad we agree that the letter is addressed to believers begotten by the word of God, not the lost. It does seem you have shifted your ground from seeing "righteousness of God" as the lost appropriating the redemptive work of Christ at salvation ("Putting aside filthiness sounds like repentance, and receiving with humility the gospel of Christ sounds like believing.") to now claiming it refers to works evidencing salvation ("walking the talk"). I'm confused about your view here.Thanks for your views, but like you, I could not ride your wagon, either.
You indicated you did not think James 1:20 used "the righteousness of God" as a metonymy for God's redemptive work in Christ.
First, James is not addressing "believers" as brethren, but fellow Israelites. See James 1:1. But as you noted, they have professed faith in Christ. So James is saying "test yourselves" are you lip service professors, or do you actually walk the talk.
So the issue of James 1:19-20 is whether a professing believer, walks the talk. This is not works to achieve salvation, this is evidence of salvation.
To construe "save your soul" to refer to walking the talk is, for me, a bridge too far.
I'm glad we agree that the letter is addressed to believers begotten by the word of God, not the lost. It does seem you have shifted your ground from seeing "righteousness of God" as the lost appropriating the redemptive work of Christ at salvation ("Putting aside filthiness sounds like repentance, and receiving with humility the gospel of Christ sounds like believing.") to now claiming it refers to works evidencing salvation ("walking the talk"). I'm confused about your view here.
Interesting that both you and I disagree with him, as i am a Cal, and you are not!It doubt that it would be "Systematic" though
Sorry, but we do not agree, it is addressed, in my opinion, to professing Christians, which may or may not be born anew Christians. Recall the second and third soils of Matthew 13, you can believe superficially or be unwilling to forsake worldly treasure, and therefore be a professing Christian, but not an actual Christian.
Yes, I was not clear, my bad. Consider two cases, a professing Christian (actually a tare) should not think he or she is saved if unwilling to turn to God and trust fully in Christ. On the other hand, a professing Christian (actually born anew) should be able to examine themselves and determine they are "of the faith." Do they have "live" faith or "dead" faith?
Which Luther wrongly saw James as teaching!Sorry, but I can't find your false professors referenced anywhere in the context, and they certainly cannot be included as "begotten by God with the word of truth." Nor can I stretch my imagination to believe that James refers to his audience of first generation Jewish Christians as "a kind of firstfruits" (1:18) when the presence of such "tares" would render it an impure and contaminated offering. There is only one issue for the lost, and it isn't what they are willing to forsake or any other aspect of behavior addressed in chapter 1; it is Christ.
With respect, saving faith in Christ is simply not the topic in James; if waking up false professors to their lost condition were the goal, a clear and vivid presentation of the gospel of Christ would be central. If you have found such a passage (like Acts 16:31, Romans 1:16, Romans 10:9-10, etc.) I would welcome the opportunity to see it and improve my understanding.
James is not presenting Christ as the object of saving faith (worthy as that topic is) but rather focuses on the begetting, implanted word of God as the object of living faith and obedience for us AFTER salvation, like Paul does in 2 Tim 3:16-17. See James 2:1 as one example. Your interpretation inevitably forces the conclusion that James 2:24 teaches salvation by works.
Which Luther wrongly saw James as teaching!
Repent of what?The Bible nowhere teaches justification by faith alone. Because repentance is necessary as well for the sinner to be justified with God
Repent of what?
Do not see Paul stating that, as his message was turn to and believe in Lord Jesus and get saved!Sins against the Lord.
Do not see Paul stating that, as his message was turn to and believe in Lord Jesus and get saved!
Do not see Paul stating that, as his message was turn to and believe in Lord Jesus and get saved!
Sorry, but I can't find your false professors referenced anywhere in the context, and they certainly cannot be included as "begotten by God with the word of truth." Nor can I stretch my imagination to believe that James refers to his audience of first generation Jewish Christians as "a kind of firstfruits" (1:18) when the presence of such "tares" would render it an impure and contaminated offering. There is only one issue for the lost, and it isn't what they are willing to forsake or any other aspect of behavior addressed in chapter 1; it is Christ.
With respect, saving faith in Christ is simply not the topic in James; if waking up false professors to their lost condition were the goal, a clear and vivid presentation of the gospel of Christ would be central. If you have found such a passage (like Acts 16:31, Romans 1:16, Romans 10:9-10, etc.) I would welcome the opportunity to see it and improve my understanding.
James is not presenting Christ as the object of saving faith (worthy as that topic is) but rather focuses on the begetting, implanted word of God as the object of living faith and obedience for us AFTER salvation, like Paul does in 2 Tim 3:16-17. See James 2:1 as one example. Your interpretation inevitably forces the conclusion that James 2:24 teaches salvation by works.
Do not see Paul stating that, as his message was turn to and believe in Lord Jesus and get saved!
James 1:12 (NASB)Sorry, but I can't find your false professors SNIP
I think the professing but not actual Christ is found throughout the chapter. And as I said, not all that profess to be "begotten by God with the word of truth" are wheat. BTW, what verse and chapter and version does this quote come from? [/QUOTE}
James 1:18.
James 1:21
Therefore, putting aside all filthiness and all that remains of wickedness, in humility receive the word implanted, which is able to save your souls.
Here for example is a contextual verse that indicates some of James audience might need to "receive" the word implanted. Thus perhaps unsaved. Certainly James and others of the audience were born anew.
And with respect, nothing I present supports salvation by works.
James 1:12 (NASB)
Blessed is a man who perseveres under trial; for once he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.
Clearly, some in James audience may not have been "approved." For they have not received the "crown of life."