BobRyan
Well-Known Member
Is it your argument that the Jewish church must be infallible OR we must toss out SCRIPTURE??
Bounds
Once again myopic concern for 'all things Roman Catholic' blind you to the fact that I am speaking about the New Testament Canon. The Old Testament really doesn't concern me at this point because it is in the particular books of the New Testament that we create all of our presuppositions for Christ, the Trinity etc.
The book of Romans alone contains over FORTY references to the OT as the authorative scripture in use by NT writers. You are turning a blind eye to the scripture of 2Tim 3 being referenced as "inspired" and given as "the basis for DOCTRINE, INSTRUCTION and Correction" by that statement above. yet this is the position of OT SCRIPTURE for NT writers.
14 You, however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of, knowing from whom you have learned them,
15 and that from childhood you have known thesacred writings which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness;
17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work
You see - the Bible is a "house of cards" once you start chucking large sections out the window the whole thing falls apart sir.
But if you HOLD to the integrity of scripture THEN the Words of Christ in Mark 7 (pre-cross) DO hold for ALL saints and the lessons learned there DO apply.
The Point remains. You seek to make the argument that ERROR in that group that administered the ONE TRUE WORD - would require that we ALSO reject the WORD or embrace the doctrine errors - the traditions of men. But Christ shows us in Mark 7 - such is not the case.
In Christ,
Bob
Last edited by a moderator: