• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Swift Boating of Cindy Sheehan

Baptist in Richmond

Active Member
Originally posted by carpro:
Your challenges worry me not at all.
laugh.gif

http://www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/18/3387/3.html
BTW, since you referenced this:
I asked you for your source, and you provided an extensive list for me, citing several sources for this timeline. Am I to believe that you personally researched all these articles and created this timeline from scratch? Is that what you are saying?

Just curious,
BiR
 

Baptist in Richmond

Active Member
Originally posted by Mike McK:
BiR,

You know, I really enjoy your posts and I have a lot of respect for you, personally, but everybody who has called you out is right.
Likewise, and you know that I am very fond of you as well. I trust that all is well with you and yours.

As for calling me out, exactly who called me out? I simply pointed out that the SwiftVets have not been completely forthright.

If you're going to make these accusations, you really do need to back it up.
I posted several links that document the things that were noted about the SwiftVets by Media Matters for America. I have yet to see anyone dispute their charges.

I disagree with President Bush. I believe he was just trying to be diplomatic.

If he had served his country proudly, then why did he have himself shipped out after just a few months?

Why did he come back only to stab the men he had just served with in the back?
So, if I understand you correctly, Kerry did NOT serve his country, as noted by my President. Remember: he actually went to Vietnam, although he undoubtedly could have avoided it. However little time he did serve, he still served.

Lots and lots of Christian love to you,
BiR
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Baptist in Richmond:
Originally posted by carpro:
Your challenges worry me not at all.
laugh.gif


Am I to believe that you personally researched all these articles and created this timeline from scratch? Is that what you are saying?

Just curious,
BiR
Believe whatever you wish. I could care less.
 

Mike McK

New Member
Originally posted by Baptist in Richmond:
Likewise, and you know that I am very fond of you as well. I trust that all is well with you and yours.
Thank you.

As for calling me out, exactly who called me out? I simply pointed out that the SwiftVets have not been completely forthright.
And several people now, and I add myself to that list, have asked you to show in what way they haven't been "forthright".


I posted several links that document the things that were noted about the SwiftVets by Media Matters for America. I have yet to see anyone dispute their charges.
Fair enough. I'll look into them and get back to you.

So, if I understand you correctly, Kerry did NOT serve his country, as noted by my President. Remember: he actually went to Vietnam, although he undoubtedly could have avoided it. However little time he did serve, he still served.
He did serve for 3 1/2 months out of a two year tour.

He left voluntarily after 3 1/2 months.

Several medical officials have testified that, while he was wounded, none of his wounds were severe enough to send him home.

And then there's the matter of what he left Vietnam to do.

He didn't come home to pick up a private life. He came home to become an anti-American radical, stabbing the men he had just served with, many of whom were still there, following through on their committment, in the backs.

We do know that his accusations before Congress were used as propaganda by the Communists and prisoners were tortured because of them.

This does not sound like an honorable man or a good American to me.

Lots and lots of Christian love to you,
BiR
And to you, as well.
 

Baptist in Richmond

Active Member
Originally posted by carpro:
Believe whatever you wish. I could care less.
Couldn't help but notice that you didn't answer my question: are you saying that you created that timeline yourself?

A simple yes/no question......

Regards,
BiR
 

Baptist in Richmond

Active Member
Originally posted by Mike McK:
And several people now, and I add myself to that list, have asked you to show in what way they haven't been "forthright".
Sure: my post on page two of this discussion: second one from the top.

Regards,
BiR
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
ballfan: "Nixon would have won except for massive
voter fraud in Cook County, Ill"

Don't forget the dead voting in Texas :(

I refer to the Nixon loss in 1960.
One county in Texas had 718 votes cast for
the democratic Kennedy out of 312 registered
voters :(

In 1968, when Nixon won, he won by placing
polling place monitors in Cook county to
help prevent repeat voters and polling
place monitors in rural Texas to prevent
the dead from voting.

(Note for the humor impaired: the following is
a joke: certain elements are enhansed
favoring humor rather than historical accuracy.)

In the 3rd week of Nov 1960 my Grandfather
(Mother's Dad) said: "I'm mad at Daddy!!"

"What, what" we said "he died 22 years ago"

"Yes, but he came back from the dead to
vote Democratic and didn't even come
to see me :( "
 

Speed Gracer

New Member
George W. Bush won - fair and square - according to the law.
laugh.gif
Good one. Is that why he had all those lawyers? Cause he knew he won fair and square? The only people that voted for him were Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians who think that Bush represents the Christian community.

If you ask me, anyone that kills for personal gain and claims he is chistian should never get a christian vote. He has more soldiers in Iraq than he does in Afganistan. That should tell you something: Speacial interest republicans win again and America loses...
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Back to the topic--Mrs. Sheehan is now calling the President names again:

'"When I get up [to heaven], he's gonna say, 'Good job, mom,'" the California woman said in a speech last night upon her return to Crawford, Texas. "He's not going to say, 'Why'd you make me spin in my grave?' you know. And I can just hear him saying, 'George Bush, you are really an idiot. You didn't know what you were doing when you killed me. You didn't know what you were getting into.'"'

Mrs. Sheehan's potty mouth was what sunk her boat. I wonder how much longer the Democrats are going to hide behind Mrs. Sheehan?
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
The only people that voted for him were Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians who think that Bush represents the Christian community.

crying_baby.jpg
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by Speed Gracer:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />George W. Bush won - fair and square - according to the law.
laugh.gif
Good one. Is that why he had all those lawyers? Cause he knew he won fair and square? The only people that voted for him were Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians who think that Bush represents the Christian community.

If you ask me, anyone that kills for personal gain and claims he is chistian should never get a christian vote. He has more soldiers in Iraq than he does in Afganistan. That should tell you something: Speacial interest republicans win again and America loses...
</font>[/QUOTE]Consider the above intemperate remarks by Speed Gracer and then realize that those who opposed Mr. Bush have passionately endorsed the slaughter of more than 40,000,000 unborn children. That is the reason they are afraid of Mr. Bush and the possibility that his Supreme Court appointees will bring an end to this senseless slaughter.

Speed Gracer demonstrates the hypocrisy of those who criticize Mr. Bush's policies and yet endorse the murder of the unborn.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by Speed Gracer:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />George W. Bush won - fair and square - according to the law.
laugh.gif
Good one. Is that why he had all those lawyers? Cause he knew he won fair and square? The only people that voted for him were Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians who think that Bush represents the Christian community.

If you ask me, anyone that kills for personal gain and claims he is chistian should never get a christian vote. He has more soldiers in Iraq than he does in Afganistan. That should tell you something: Speacial interest republicans win again and America loses...
</font>[/QUOTE]Courtesy of Speed Gracer we now know that the majority of people in this country are Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians! :D
 

Mike McK

New Member
Originally posted by Speed Gracer:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />George W. Bush won - fair and square - according to the law.
laugh.gif
Good one. Is that why he had all those lawyers? Cause he knew he won fair and square?
</font>[/QUOTE]That's precisely why he had lawyers: because he knew that he won fair and square and he wasn't about to let the Florida State Supreme Court take it away from him by bastardizing the law for their own purposes.

Good for him.

The only people that voted for him were Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians who think that Bush represents the Christian community.
President Bush has never claimed to "represent the Christian community". He's the president, not a religious leader.

If you ask me, anyone that kills for personal gain and claims he is chistian should never get a christian vote.
OK. I'll bite: what "personal gain" is President Bush killing for and who has he killed?

He has more soldiers in Iraq than he does in Afganistan. That should tell you something: Speacial interest republicans win again and America loses... [/QB]
No, it tells me that we've more or less stablized Afghanistan and there is more work to do in Iraq.
 

Speed Gracer

New Member
Speed Gracer demonstrates the hypocrisy of those who criticize Mr. Bush's policies and yet endorse the murder of the unborn.
Be careful what you say. Bush has policies similar to that of abortion: murder is murder.
 

Speed Gracer

New Member
Courtesy of Speed Gracer we now know that the majority of people in this country are Rednecks, senior citizens, Cowboys, and really mislead Christians!
Yes, exactly. All, let me see, 51% percent of you. Which leaves 49% of us. Sound's pretty even to me. Oh, by the way, you want to know what the future is? 18 to 30 year olds voted 67% in favor of Democracy. And what about the South? Here in Alabama, Bush got about 65% of the vote. There are alot of rednecks in Alabama. If you don't believe me, come to Alabama. I have grounds to stand on with my statement.
 

Baptist in Richmond

Active Member
Originally posted by Mike McK:
That's precisely why he had lawyers: because he knew that he won fair and square and he wasn't about to let the Florida State Supreme Court take it away from him by bastardizing the law for their own purposes.
Hello Mike,

Hope you had a great week, and are ready for an even greater weekend.

As for winning fair and square, that is not exactly true. I was in Florida in 2000, I voted for President Bush, and was disgusted with both sides after Election Day. Neither side was blameless in 2000.

Lots of Christian love,
BiR
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by Speed Gracer:
There are alot of rednecks in Alabama. If you don't believe me, come to Alabama. I have grounds to stand on with my statement.
I would say that anyone in Alabama who had not learned that they had been shafted by the liberal/left since the days of FDR was a redneck. You seem to fit in that category.
 

elijah_lives

New Member
He has more soldiers in Iraq than he does in Afganistan.

Military necessity. If it was the other way around, I'd be seriously questioning his strategic planning.

Be careful what you say. Bush has policies similar to that of abortion: murder is murder.

Murder is unjustified killing. That definition fits the practice of abortion perfectly. It doesn't apply at all to our military actions in Iraq or Afghanistan. If it did, you'd be implicitly calling virtually every President we've had, in recent memory, of murder. It also explicitly calls our servicemen (and women) in action murderers.

This is a perfect example of overblown, irresponsible rhetoric. I absolutely reject it.
 

Dragoon68

Active Member
Originally posted by elijah_lives:
He has more soldiers in Iraq than he does in Afganistan.

Military necessity. If it was the other way around, I'd be seriously questioning his strategic planning.

Be careful what you say. Bush has policies similar to that of abortion: murder is murder.

Murder is unjustified killing. That definition fits the practice of abortion perfectly. It doesn't apply at all to our military actions in Iraq or Afghanistan. If it did, you'd be implicitly calling virtually every President we've had, in recent memory, of murder. It also explicitly calls our servicemen (and women) in action murderers.

This is a perfect example of overblown, irresponsible rhetoric. I absolutely reject it.
Those were some great responses!
 
Top