dragonfly said:
A good argument for socialized health care, which I support wholeheartedly!
Where some of us are concerned is the trade off: affordable health care for everyone (sure, big positive)...traded for:
- Lower quality of service (see Walter Reed Hosptital (veterans), your local DMV office, FEMA, and other government "help programs.")
- Medical professionals who are currently in business for themselves essentially become governmenet employees.
- Government control can be exerted over every area of one's life, because....well, "they" pay for your healthcare. (See..ban on potato chips, trans fat ban, etc.)
- I admit our system isn't working well...when a suit from an insurance company gets to determine what care is given.
- However, this beats a suit from the US Government making that same decision.
- I can't think of an industry (other than law enforcement & defense) in which a government monopoly does the job better than private industry. The telephone industry comes to mind. Lots of other examples come to mind. Why would healthcare suddenly be an exception?
Does our system need fixing? Yep. But I liken a government healthcare proposal to the following:
I take a car in to the mechanic, with transmission trouble. We both agree--the transmission's needs work. So, as a solution, he replaces my transmission with another one...but also removes the engine and puts in two squirrels and a conveyer belt.
Sure, it's a
change. And the novelty of it might even intrigue me for a while...but eventually, I'll discover that now, I've traded one major problem for an even more problematic one.
Change is seldom worth doing, unless it is an
improvement.