Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Actually, they are afraid he will lose. He has never accepted the results of an election. Even the 2016 election that he won -- he claimed massive fraud.It has been stated - elsewhere that the real reason is the Dems are afraid that Trump would run again in 2024- and if so- they might be afraid that he would win.
I'm not sure who you are addressing, but since I have used the word "cult" speaking of the Trump personality cult, I will address it.You would impress more if you would advocate stopping the murder of black babies with half the energy of political posturing about "cults".
...Not everything is about abortion. Not every conversation here is about abortion, and I suspect that you speak of more topics than abortion in your day-to-day conversations. ...
You noticed I didAnd I'm not sure why you are calling out "black babies" instead of the unborn of all ethnicities.
Fortunately, since the makers of voting machines and software have sued major right-wing figures, such as Lin Wood, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell, Fox News, etc., there will be a legal accounting of the election, under rules of law, not whatever pundits claim.2) Should there be an investigation to see how much fraud there was.
I'm not sure who you are addressing, but since I have used the word "cult" speaking of the Trump personality cult, I will address it.
Not everything is about abortion. Not every conversation here is about abortion, and I suspect that you speak of more topics than abortion in your day-to-day conversations. And I'm not sure why you are calling out "black babies" instead of the unborn of all ethnicities.
One of the key signs of a cult is that any level of independent thought, questioning, or dissent is forbidden.
After today’s presentation, there is no reason not to acquit, or to demand that every Dem first resign and accept a permanent ban from office as an example, and then take the vote.who I wonder about is Cassidy from Louisiana. Bet he votes to acquit.
LOL. Wow. Just wow. Shadow presidency? Trump? Talk about your conspiracy theorists. The Progressive Left Dems are the biggest conspiracy theorists of all, and then conspire to make theirs seemingly become reality, while they actually conspire in the same vein as their accusations. Didn’t you forget to mention Russian collusion again?I would think that all patriotic Americans would be concerned about Trump trying to run a shadow Presidency over the next four years and then running again, since he has never accepted the result of any election he has been in.
And again with the nonsense. The Dems, hypocrites supreme, rushed the impeachment in the House without allowing or doing any investigation whatsoever, and ignored all constitutionalities that mitigated against such an extreme measure as impeachment. It never should have reached the Senate.The only reason they are continuing the impeachment process after the former President is out of office is because Mitch McConnell controlled the timing. Republicans have no right to complain about it since it was a Republican decision.
This could always be easily seen since Trump supporters (here and other forums) cannot publicly admit that former President Trump is frequently dishonest — even with explicit evidence. They know they cannot speak freely about it without facing the wrath of other Trump supporters. That’s a key sign of a personality cult.I can understand somewhat about thinking Trump has a cult following.
Abortion is a very important issue, but electing Republican Presidents has done little to change the legal status of abortion over the past 30 years. Moreover, I don’t think the way to end abortion is to try to elect Presidents to nominate certain types of Justices, that may one day overturn Roe v. Wade, which would not end abortion. If we managed to overturn Roe v. Wade, the matter would go back to the states and each state would decide the issue on their own.What I do not understand how an accomplished Christian can support candidates that think a fetus is less than a human being, have them exterminated for convenience, and say to me that it just one topic in my barrel of topics.
Primarily because I have the easy side of the argument.It would not take long for you to out think me and use logic to poke holes in any argument I could come up with.
Fetuses have value, most people believe that. The big question in the Roe v. Wade decision and among most who support abortion to some degree is when personhood begins. The official position of BaptistBoard is that “life begins at conception” and no one is allowed to question that. Therefore the greatest number of lives lost occurs when the embryo does not implant in the uterus (from 30%-50% of the time) and the embryo passes out of the woman’s body.We were all fetuses at one point, no?
Then at that point we didn't count so I'm just a wet noodle for suggesting fetuses have human value.
You should educate yourself before you attack others.LOL. Wow. Just wow. Shadow presidency? Trump? Talk about your conspiracy theorists.
No, you weren't "simply." You made no reference to anyone else. BTW, do you have an original source rather merely an article about? Or was that lone quote the entire substance?You should educate yourself before you attack others.
I’m simply referencing what Lindsay Graham has said.
I am not “ok with abortion.”Nice way of putting it but please, are you ok with abortion?
I am simply being accurate and trying to speak with precision. Humankind has been aborting children for at least 5,000 years, so there are some who will do it no matter what. Then there are folks who believe that the removal and death of an embryo when removed from an ectopic pregnancy is abortion, so I’m trying to cover that as well."But getting back to the issue, if conservative Christians were to transform our culture through the power of the Spirit by acting like Jesus, not just grabbing after worldly power to dictate our convictions, we could change everything and make abortion extremely rare."
"Extremely rare" sounds like it could be construed as a tacit approval so set me straight if it's worth it to you. Prob not.
I don’t know what you mean by “morally feasible,” but yes, Jesus was crucified. As Bonhoeffer stated so well, “when Christ calls a man, He bids him to come and die.” Jesus told us to take up our cross and follow Him. It is a metaphorical cross (to consider ourselves as dead men) and sometimes a more literal cross that leads to martyrdom.They killed Jesus for His efforts to make things morally feasible. Wasn't He conservative in the power of the Spirit?
"Grabbing worldly power to dictate" is the politician's mantra, no?
But does any of that actually end abortion, or make people think abortion is a bad thing when they have an unwanted pregnancy?Here is a list of what some Catholics think President Trump did to halt abortion...
Good, because I’m not terribly interest in identifying with a political party.I am not asking you to become a Republican or a Democrat...
No, I’m pro-life....just asking if you will support ANY politician who seeks to protect the lives of fetuses, of whatever color. And support them in spite of potential detriment to other causes.
If the proliferation of abortion was the only moral issue facing our nation, Your premise would have more weight, but if we want to be pro-life, we have many other areas to be concerned about.Perhaps you see it more as one more wave in a sea of troubles.
Sorry, I assumed you would know what I meant by “shadow President.” Do you realize you could have looked it up on a search engine if you didn’t know what that meant?No, you weren't "simply." You made no reference to anyone else.
The legitimacy of the observation does not depend upon whether or not Lindsey Graham said it. But so that you know the source, it was reported as a statement to Peter Nicolas as part of an opinion piece for The Atlantic. I remembered it because it was a perceptive comment by Graham.BTW, do you have an original source rather merely an article about? Or was that lone quote the entire substance?
More than influence, but being the defacto head of the Republican Party, holding rallies and issuing press releases. That’s a change from the way things have been done in the past. That’s what I meant — and what Graham seemed to be saying — when we referred to Trump being a “shadow President.’In any case, the notion that Trump continuing to have influence in the Republican party while Biden is president...
I never claimed that he would run the Executive Branch. That’s why I said “shadow” President. He would have to be President to run the Executive Branch.But to present it as you did, as a conspiracy to run the executive branch while not president, is beyond ridiculous, and certainly not what Lindsay said.