-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Tlaib uses expletive while calling for impeachment
- Thread starter rlvaughn
- Start date
- Status
Thank you!
She showed the face of Muslim women without the burka. I run into them around here and sometimes I cannot dodge them successfully. They are often angry.
Also, she shows that she is part of the red-green alliance, communism and Islam, in that she talks like a leftist but she is a green (Islam's favorite color). Personally, I think that the jihadis will defeat the left easily as soon as the capitalists, conservatives, and Christians are destroyed. I think that the Jews will go with the reds.
She showed the face of Muslim women without the burka. I run into them around here and sometimes I cannot dodge them successfully. They are often angry.
Also, she shows that she is part of the red-green alliance, communism and Islam, in that she talks like a leftist but she is a green (Islam's favorite color). Personally, I think that the jihadis will defeat the left easily as soon as the capitalists, conservatives, and Christians are destroyed. I think that the Jews will go with the reds.
Last edited:
Seems to be a new tactic - dropping the F bomb (or worse) to show outrage (selective outrage of course).
Yes as soon as the the promised caliphate flag flies over the WH - All are Muslims or paying the Tax of the Infidel - the Jizyah.
ISIS: We will raise our flag in the White House
No, Nancy, a Congresswoman using this kind of language at a public event is not a "generational thing" - this Pali whackjob is around my age, and I bet she'd change her tune if some Republican had ever called Obama this.
Just another new "multi-cutural" socialist democrat that the MSM coddles and shields. Look what other hate-filled, often anti-Semitic words come of this creature's mouth, she is vile.
Just another new "multi-cutural" socialist democrat that the MSM coddles and shields. Look what other hate-filled, often anti-Semitic words come of this creature's mouth, she is vile.
Rockson
Active Member
True but they might be shocked to see that backfire on them. Some who might be prone to vote Dem might find this type of approach give them pause for thought and scare them. It's taking all civility down to the lowest level possible and are they really wanting things to be as base as this. If you're electing extremely aggressive individuals what type of government might you someday have?
What would have happened if she had did exact same thing to president Obama?
Democrats just don't care about other people at all. Here is what AOC said about this issue:
Ocasio-Cortez hit back at the president and the GOP in a tweet Saturday, calling their response to Tlaib “Republican hypocrisy at its finest.”
“Saying that Trump admitting to sexual assault on tape is just ‘locker room talk,’ but scandalizing themselves into faux-outrage when my sis says a curse word in a bar,” she said. “GOP lost entitlement to policing women’s behavior a long time ago.”
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Hypocritical GOP forgives Trump's sexual assault but is outraged by Tlaib's swearing
Ocasio-Cortez hit back at the president and the GOP in a tweet Saturday, calling their response to Tlaib “Republican hypocrisy at its finest.”
“Saying that Trump admitting to sexual assault on tape is just ‘locker room talk,’ but scandalizing themselves into faux-outrage when my sis says a curse word in a bar,” she said. “GOP lost entitlement to policing women’s behavior a long time ago.”
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Hypocritical GOP forgives Trump's sexual assault but is outraged by Tlaib's swearing
Oh, Lordy! She would have been excoriated no end.
Remember the Republican congressman who couldn't contain himself during Obama's SOTU address and blurted out "You lie".
He was crucified, even though Obama was lying.
His Statement:
"This evening, I let my emotions get the best of me when listening to the president's remarks regarding the coverage of illegal immigrants in the health care bill," the statement said. "While I disagree with the president's statement, my comments were inappropriate and regrettable. I extend sincere apologies to the president for this lack of civility."
Wilson also called the White House to apologize and spoke with Obama's Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, who accepted the apology on the president's behalf, according to a senior administration official."
You'll hear no apology like this from a democrat. Ever.
Last edited:
Don't you know, Trump talked naughty in private before he ever even ran for a public office so that logically justifies this type of language in public.
Don't you know, Trump talked naughty in private before he ever even ran for a public office so that logically justifies this type of language in public.
Nice spin!
Don't you know, Trump talked naughty in private before he ever even ran for a public office so that logically justifies this type of language in public.
I think that the majority of Muslims would like to destroy the USA. As for AOC, you will never hear a kind word from her.
Sorry to destroy your best argument.
Considering I haven’t posted an argument in this thread that is pretty impressive. Do you always destroy imaginary arguments and declare victory.
Well, being you have complimented me for my "nice spin" I could only assume that what I "spun" was an argument that I could be pretty sure was more than imaginary considering there must be an object to what you complimented me on to which you considered to be a spin.
But, of course if you'd like to agree with me that the Left's argument was fallaciously made while attempting to rest on that 2 wrongs makes a right and not even a good comparison considering the private vs public factor I'll accept that you are in disagreement with your team on this one. No problem.
Well, being you have complimented me for my "nice spin" I could only assume that what I "spun" was an argument that I could be pretty sure was more than imaginary considering there must be an object to what you complimented me on to which you considered to be a spin.
But, of course if you'd like to agree with me that the Left's argument was fallaciously made while attempting to rest on that 2 wrongs makes a right and not even a good comparison considering the private vs public factor I'll accept that you are in disagreement with your team on this one. No problem.
Guys Benjamin is now writing arguments for me and is now arguing with himself on my behalf. Spoiler alert. He lets himself win! Lol.
I don’t know why I always have to break these things down for you, Use of Time?!?
Perhaps you should change your name to Takes My Time being how you just beg for me to nail you to the wall and expose your arguments for what they really are before you’ll be satisfied. Now, pay attention Use of Time because my time is limited towards its use to have to spell these things out for you.In reply to the Left’s argument I said: “Don't you know, Trump talked naughty in private before he ever even ran for a public office so that logically justifies this type of language in public.”
To which you replied: “Nice spin!”
Now, there is a couple of ways I could take that:
(1) As your sincere compliment meaning I laid out the argument in an organized and logical manner. (Of course we know that ain’t gonna come out of your mouth.)
Or
(2) As your suggestion meaning that I did “Spin a Story”, defined as: “To tell a lie or only part of the truth in order to convince someone of something or to avoid the consequences of something.”
Now, knowing your background here and sentiments I think the meaning of your post is pretty clear, don’t you? It’s okay, you can admit it, …we all know the truth here anyway.
So… taking for granted that your “compliment” was in reference to #(2) I replied, and forgive me for the dry humor sarcasm, I said: “Sorry to destroy your best argument.
“To which you replied: “Considering I haven’t posted an argument in this thread that is pretty impressive. Do you always destroy imaginary arguments and declare victory.”
Well, I guess this needs to be spelled out too, it should go without saying that you didn’t make the Left’s argument yourself but rather were defending it by going on the offense with #(2) towards my argument.
But, since you seemed to be wondering how I came to my conclusion that it must have been your argument – without you actually saying it or admitting it, …
I spelled out the simple reasoning for you of how I arrived to this conclusion: “Well, being you have complimented me for my "nice spin" I could only assume that what I "spun" was an argument that I could be pretty sure was more than imaginary considering there must be an object to what you complimented me on to which you considered to be a spin.”
I guess I can't blame you for ignoring that I confirmed your belief that I am "pretty impressive" to have figured out where you coming form.
On a side note, just so you know, I also gave you the benefit of the doubt that on your take you could have meant “Nice Spin’ as a sincere compliment and actually agreed with my argument rather than trying inject #(2) into the discussion.
So I generously offered you an out when I said: “But, of course if you'd like to agree with me that the Left's argument was fallaciously made while attempting to rest on that 2 wrongs makes a right and not even a good comparison considering the private vs public factor I'll accept that you are in disagreement with your team on this one. No problem.”
But, apparently you didn't want to take me up on this out nor did you actually man up to being on other side of this argument.
Well, there you go bud,
let it never be said that I am not a patient man with those who only wish to be obstinate and try to argue in circles to avoid facing the logical music about what they are actually saying and meaning, yes, the truth is as just-want-peace said: “…he's just trying to help you make yourself relevant!”
Last edited:
I don’t know why I always have to break these things down for you, Use of Time?!?
In reply to the Left’s argument I said: “Don't you know, Trump talked naughty in private before he ever even ran for a public office so that logically justifies this type of language in public.”
To which you replied: “Nice spin!”
Now, there is a couple of ways I could take that:
(1) As your sincere compliment meaning I laid out the argument in an organized and logical manner. (Of course we know that ain’t gonna come out of your mouth.)
Or
(2) As your suggestion meaning that I did “Spin a Story”, defined as: “To tell a lie or only part of the truth in order to convince someone of something or to avoid the consequences of something.”
Now, knowing your background here and sentiments I think the meaning of your post is pretty clear, don’t you? It’s okay, you can admit it, …we all know the truth here anyway.
So… taking for granted that your “compliment” was in reference to #(2) I replied, and forgive me for the dry humor sarcasm, I said: “Sorry to destroy your best argument.
To which you replied: “Considering I haven’t posted an argument in this thread that is pretty impressive. Do you always destroy imaginary arguments and declare victory.”
Well, I guess this needs to be spelled out too, it should go without saying that you didn’t make the Left’s argument yourself but rather were defending it by going on the offense with #(2) towards my argument.
But, since you seemed to be wondering how I came to my conclusion that it must have been your argument – without you actually saying it or admitting it, …
I spelled out the simple reasoning for you of how I arrived to this conclusion: “Well, being you have complimented me for my "nice spin" I could only assume that what I "spun" was an argument that I could be pretty sure was more than imaginary considering there must be an object to what you complimented me on to which you considered to be a spin.”
I guess I can't blame you for ignoring that I confirmed your belief that I am "pretty impressive" to have figured out where you coming form.
On a side note, just so you know, I also gave you the benefit of the doubt that on your take you could have meant “Nice Spin’ as a sincere compliment and actually agreed with my argument rather than trying inject #(2) into the discussion.
So I generously offered you an out when I said: “But, of course if you'd like to agree with me that the Left's argument was fallaciously made while attempting to rest on that 2 wrongs makes a right and not even a good comparison considering the private vs public factor I'll accept that you are in disagreement with your team on this one. No problem.”
But, apparently you didn't want to take me up on this out nor did you actually man up to being on other side of this argument.
Well, there you go bud,
I personally find her obnoxious and a little presumptuous for being a freshman office holder. You apparently decided to set the goal posts yourself with the whole public vs private argument. There are two wrongs here sure. She dropped an f bomb and was hostile. He bragged about sexually assaulting women in private . Those are pretty far apart in my opinion. But at least she isn’t trying to present herself as anything different. She says cuss words. Okay. The “Trump said it in private” is a fine argument to make but it has a fatal flaw. It means Trump is a phony who shows his true character in private while pretending to be otherwise in the media. At least she is owning who she is. A woman who said a cuss word. Wow.
Explain how Trump is any better in that regard. This ought to be good. I love being told to man up by internet people. I don’t think you would have been able to walk a mile in my shoes tough guy.
No, the error is in saying that Trump's private remark about the lasciviousness of women is equivalent to this anti-American jihadist cursing of the President of the United States. But then you might have been down with Jeremiah Wright's cursing of the USA, also--Jeremiah Wright who now lives in a million dollar mansion in an all white suburb of Chicago just as the equally foul-mouthed threat-issuing Maxine Waters, whose husband is a crook, lives in a four million dollar mansion in West Hollywood, okay I grant you that not many people want to live in the sodomite city of West Hollywood.
- Status