I just want to say that three of the people I disagree with the most doctrinally are Icon, EWF, and SN, and yet they are my three best friends here. Ironic, ain't it? :laugh:
Wow. I would never be friends with those guys! :laugh:
:1_grouphug:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I just want to say that three of the people I disagree with the most doctrinally are Icon, EWF, and SN, and yet they are my three best friends here. Ironic, ain't it? :laugh:
The BB makes for strange bedfellows, indeed.
I just want to say that three of the people I disagree with the most doctrinally are Icon, EWF, and SN, and yet they are my three best friends here. Ironic, ain't it? :laugh:
Ah, MEX .... I dont ah.....I wish your turn of phrase would be adjusted .... ya know!!!!
Wow. I would never be friends with those guys! :laugh:
:1_grouphug:
Mexdeaf
MexD said:
Yes these sad and pathetic posts offer no substance at all, and you have clearly identified the cause of the weak condition of the church in our day.
These uninformed comments show a complete lack of understanding the
and are devoid of any ability to offer any biblical response...so you get these kind of statements:wavey:
Robert Snow:
10/25/2011 : "The fact is,that I don't view Calvinism as heresy,there is much truth in it,I just don't think it is altogether correct."
2/27/2011 : "I was not calling Calvinism as false..."
Robert,Well of course everything Calvinism teaches is not wrong, but I don't think they come to the correct conclusion.
He has no knowledge of church history.He has no substance, and is nothing but a nuscience.[sic]
The thing that irks me is people like the author of this thread making those who do believe in sovereignty look weak. In fact, people like this are allies of the Arminian position.
Another case of S/N caught again. On 5/2/2013 he said regarding me:"How dare you,as a Christian,well versed in church history..." Sat/Nep viewd me as having some knowlege of church history. Now a mere 9 days later he claims that I have no knowledge of Church History.
It is a hoot that you contradict yourself so often. Again it's Sat/Nep vs. Sat/Nep. Who will win? LOL!
Lol, so true. He claims he fought for our freedoms, yet he started another thread wanting to ban songs he disagrees with! Mike is a walking wonder :thumbsup:
I love you Mike.I never claimed anything. Evidentally you do not read well. That is clear in your theological ideas. If you do not like threads about songs, do not respond. Frankly, if you are going to bother to display an avatar, use one that one not look like someone who should have been dead ten years before the picture is taken.
You and your buddies like Rippon can make fun all you want, the bottom line is you take up the cause (and frankly, in your case I am somewhat surprised, I thought your character was a notch above Rippon) of singing the praises of a murderer and thug.
I am a walking wonder, and also persistent. No one who praises the character of John Calvin, Hitler, Hussein, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Khan, several of the Popes, and your TV evangelists of the charasmatic persuasion, will get in the last word as long as I and many other posters are given the priviledge to post here.
Threads that uplift historical figures like that are not only devoid of any Christian elements, they are totally devoid of freedom, liberty and respect for others.
My name is not Mike, but wish you and him the best.I love you Mike.
What would be your main beef?
Do you lump 4/5 pointers together as saying same things?
I have a much bigger problem with Calvinists than I do with Calvinism.