• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Transgenders Affirm Traditional Gender Norms.

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Transgender is an illusion. So is homosexuality. So is heterosexuality.

It's all sodomy and mutilation. Let's just put all our children around them. They'll be safe.

(I love the way the BB glitches can preserve the edits of one's opponent when one replies quickly enough.)

You just did a lot of "research" that spoke about the crimes of these "illusions" so which is it?

I see you are taking on the persona of Poncho with avatar and all. You are doing well.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In God's book, there is no heterosexuality or homosexuality. There is sodomy, and that is what is condemned.

Neither are there transgenders. There is mutilation, though.
Like I said:
Maybe it's a good thing that discussions of human sexuality is not permitted on BB. I shudder to think of the misinformation that would be posted.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Like I said:
Maybe it's a good thing that discussions of human sexuality is not permitted on BB. I shudder to think of the misinformation that would be posted.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.

I'm done, he doesn't know what these words mean apparently and his own dictionary in his head. I can't do anything with that.
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Am I the only one who now wonders when Aaron will start citing Infowars? *laugh*
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm done, he doesn't know what these words mean apparently and his own dictionary in his head. I can't do anything with that.
I know, I know.

BTW, did you know that there is no difference to Einstein and Hawking if the sun revolves around the earth or if the earth revolves around the sun? Welcome to Aaron's world, I mean, universe.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Internet Theologian

Well-Known Member
I see you disagree with what is widely known to be true and obvious so I don't even know where to go from there and I believe this particular post of yours is a response to a statement that absolutely nobody made so take a break from slaughtering straw men.
No one can speak to you when you deny any evidence that contradicts you. Go ahead. Show us all what grand people the homeaux sektual people are. Give us the evidence.

Then tell us how God was wrong in saying they have depraved minds.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No one can speak to you when you deny any evidence that contradicts you. Go ahead. Show us all what grand people the homeaux sektual people are. Give us the evidence.

Then tell us how God was wrong in saying they have depraved minds.
Apparently in IT's world homos#xual = transgender.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No one can speak to you when you deny any evidence that contradicts you. Go ahead. Show us all what grand people the homeaux sektual people are. Give us the evidence.

Then tell us how God was wrong in saying they have depraved minds.
The original question was regarding transgender. You're either relating it to homosexuality, without identifying why they're synonymous; or you're trying to change the subject to meet your arguments.

Either show the relationship of transgendered to homosexuality, or move back to the original subject.
 

Internet Theologian

Well-Known Member
Here's the simple truth - Those of the LBGQTX ('X' because they'll continue to add 'distinctions') group are all one in the same: They are all sodomites.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Bruce Jenner's Transformation Is a Lose-Lose for Liberal Ideology

Transgenderism is unavoidably based on a kind of gender essentialism. It recognizes gender identities as being associated with certain socially accepted norms. What does it mean, for example, that Jenner’s “gender” is female? It means that he gets a sex change. It means that he poses in traditionally female attire for the cover of Vanity Fair. It means that he reaffirms traditional gender norms, even as he attempts to flee from them.


. . .

If you truly celebrate Jenner’s transition, you have to do it by recognizing some cultural narrative about womanhood, thereby perpetuating gender “inequality.” But if you’re committed to the abolition of gender norms, there’s no way you can affirm Jenner’s femininity, except in the meaningless abstract. It’s a lose-lose.

http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/03/bruce-jenners-transformation-is-a-lose-lose-for-leftists/


This is all such foolishness. If you were born Bruce, I'd still be calling you Bruce.
When the XY changes to XX or XX changes to XY, then I would acknowledge Bruce changing to Cait. Until THAT happens, him and all his transgendered friends better use the bathroom that their chromosomes say they should use.

Or XX/XY can useupload_2016-4-24_15-3-58.png family rooms.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
96x96x791.jpg,q1461421574.pagespeed.ic.VMK3eV6hvj.jpg
Is that you poncho? I'm gonna ask Alex Jones.
the_alex_jones_show__68146.png
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Like I said:
Maybe it's a good thing that discussions of human sexuality is not permitted on BB. I shudder to think of the misinformation that would be posted.
You can't hide behind fluid interpretations of a bad and ambiguous rule. Let's take the discussion to the private forum You can try to baffle us with your bull-[edited] there. :cool:
 
Last edited:

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You can't hide behind fluid interpretations of a bad and ambiguous rule. Let's take the discussion to the private forum You can try to baffle us with your bull **** there. :cool:
Dude, what is with your corrupt communications lately?
 

Internet Theologian

Well-Known Member
It's remarkable to fathom that Trans are wanting to be allowed to go potty in the girls room, not kind of in your face, but totally in your face. Yet at the same time one is protecting them from the fact that they are pedophilic.

Think about it - they're being defended. Those given over to a reprobate mind, who want rights to be in a restroom with our kids.

The same that have assaulted others in restrooms. And commit reprehensible, atrocious acts with one another and on children. Now they want more exposure.

Unbelievable!
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It's remarkable to fathom that Trans are wanting to be allowed to go potty in the girls room, not kind of in your face, but totally in your face. Yet at the same time one is protecting them from the fact that they are pedophilic.

Think about it - they're being defended. Those given over to a reprobate mind, who want rights to be in a restroom with our kids.

The same that have assaulted others in restrooms. And commit reprehensible, atrocious acts with one another and on children. Now they want more exposure.

Unbelievable!
I don't agree 100% with "pedophilic." Some might be; but not all.

But I do see that catering to less than 5% (more like 1%) of the population, in order to make ourselves feel good about being "inclusive," completely ignores that pedophiles and perverts will use this opening to prey on our children and loved ones, such as what happened at the University of Toronto. Once again, we're placing the feelings of a few above the safety of the majority.
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It's remarkable to fathom that Trans are wanting to be allowed to go potty in the girls room, not kind of in your face, but totally in your face. Yet at the same time one is protecting them from the fact that they are pedophilic.

Think about it - they're being defended. Those given over to a reprobate mind, who want rights to be in a restroom with our kids.

The same that have assaulted others in restrooms. And commit reprehensible, atrocious acts with one another and on children. Now they want more exposure.

Unbelievable!

Again, transgender does not equal pedophile. Nobody is defending pedophilia. Nobody. You know labeling someone as a pedophile is a pretty serious accusation and it is one that the transgendered community doesn't even come close to equally sharing so if you have a problem with the transgendered than just say so but the continued attempt to saddle them with the moniker of pedophile like they are one in the same just isn't right or fair.
 
Last edited:
Top