Perfect for what?We have infallible b ible, again, NO doctrines or practice is affected, do you think any version is perfect then?
That is the question at the heart of our argument.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Perfect for what?We have infallible b ible, again, NO doctrines or practice is affected, do you think any version is perfect then?
What wrong think did Thayer and Winer advance though, as Thayer seemed to give what the Greek stated, even if he might not have agreed with it!Thayer, like Dr George Winer, of the 3 NT Greek grammars, allowed his theology to influence his word definitions in his lexicon, many being quite subtle, and almost convincing to the untrained mind!
We have a perfect God, not a perfect Bible!My point is that we do not have any of the originals. So by your standard we cannot have an inerrant Bible or an inspired Bible in ANY language. We just have a good guess. I don't think that's enough to base belief upon.
For what Paul stated the scriptures were profitable for!Perfect for what?
That is the question at the heart of our argument.
Are the translations of the Bible inspired?So any translation based off of any Hebrew or Greek is infallible even if the Hebrew or Greek from which they are translated differ?
How does the translation process impact the inspiration, inerrancy, and infallibility of the Bible? | GotQuestions.orgPerfect for what?
That is the question at the heart of our argument.
You may. I have a perfect Bible BECAUSE I have a perfect God.We have a perfect God, not a perfect Bible!
How do you know? Paul may have never really said that....you don't have the originals.For what Paul stated the scriptures were profitable for!
What wrong think did Thayer and Winer advance though, as Thayer seemed to give what the Greek stated, even if he might not have agreed with it!
Have read them in the past, do not have either one todayHave you got Thayer and Winer
Have read them in the past, do not have either one today
This is where textual criticism comes into play, and great news is that ANY Translation based off of Hebrew.Greek and translated rightly would be infallible
One can translate off the Critical GT, or Majority, or the TR and have still word of God into EnglishNot really
were they good ?I have Thayer and the 3 by Winer and there is no doubt that both are anti Trinity. Regardless of what anyone says on here about Thayer I know firsthand
were they good ?
One can translate off the Critical GT, or Majority, or the TR and have still word of God into English
One can translate off the Critical GT, or Majority, or the TR and have still word of God into English
How can you have the Word of God uninspired by God? Doesn't "word" in Word of God signify that it is comes from God and not man?One can translate off the Critical GT, or Majority, or the TR and have still word of God into English
We veering further and further from the OP, but I would be interested for you to define your words:Translations cannot be Inerrant, nor inspired, but are Infallible!