So, If He took away (literally) the sin of the world....we have universalism,,,,,,,,but, if He provided a way to have sin removed, then we have calvinism. I prefer the latter regardless of what you may label me.
Cheers,
Jim
There is no "if" about it. The scriptures are plain. John 1:29; 2 Cor 5:18-21.
That is a tired old Calvinist assertion. It does not lead to universalism anymore. That is a false alternative. He didn't provide a way, he did it.
So disagree with John 1:29--Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the SIN of the world. You are saying he did not take away the sin of the world. Argue with the scriptures:
I have stated what I believe about the Atonement applying to everyone without exception, or maybe that was somewhere else. So, once again: The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the World. There you have it. Romans 5:12-21 explains the barrier put between God and man by Adam's fall. 2 Cor 5:18-21 explains the answer, as well as John 1:29.
We do NOT have free will to make the initial decision or make any movement toward God, unless enabled to by the power of the Holy Spirit.
Receiving what has ALREADY been done for you is like receiving a gift from someone who is handing it to you. You can call THAT "a choice, making a decision to accept" what is being handed to you if you want to, but I don't.
Someone walks up to you says "here, I have something for you," and hands it to you. You put your hand out and receive what it is. You didn't choose or make a decision about the gift beforehand. You didn't have any idea it was going to be offered.
Likewise, before you HEAR the Word, you haven't a clue what has transpired salvation wise. But Holy Writ says "Faith comes from HEARING, and HEARING from the preaching of the Word.
You hear the word, you understand what has been accomplished for you on the Cross and you love it and recognize it as the greatest act of love in the universe, and you receive that accomplished work and appropriate that finished work.
To me it's pretty simple, just like the gospel. I think we complicate things too much.
My explanation of why some end up in hell is because they fail or outright reject what has already been done for them. They rather live in darkness because their deeds are evil, or they don't think God exists and are fools, or many other reasons. The fact is, God isn't wringing His hands and hoping someone will accept him. No, not at all. Everything necessary to reconcile the world to God, has already been done. Just hear the Word and receive it as your own. God doesn't believe for you.
I don't claim to be a brilliant theologian, just the average guy in the pew.
But I know that the universal passages connected with salvation mean exactly what they state, and do not have to be bent to fit a certain theology.
I believe scripture, not someone who flatly states that opposite, which is that "he did not take away the sin of the world." So much for subtracting from scripture.
We appropriate, individually, what has already been done for us on the Cross. What do we appropriate, or acknowledge? We trust, appropriate and acknowledge the promises of Christ in the gospel.
The bottom line is that if Christ had not died on the Cross, salvation, justification, remission of sins, would not be possible.
Acknowledging or trusting in the promises of Christ is, to me at least, totally different than thinking an unregenerate sinner can make a choice/decision to choose Christ.
Or, put another way, when used in connection with justification, faith must always be regarded as receptivity like an empty hand which does nothing but solely receives a free gift.