I read the article from the link David Lamb posted and here are some of my comments, plus I am going to include part of my own testimony.
Replacement theology was rejected by two contributors to the BBC programme. Michelle Guinness (a converted Jew) said that she had encountered this theology in the Free Churches, but no longer in the established church.
However, she did at least say that, as a Christian, she must continue to take the gospel to her fellow Jews.
I agree with this person--however, it is not stated why this Jewish believer rejected Replacement theology. The apostle Paul ALWAYS took the gospel to the Jew first.
But another contributor rejected the whole idea of preaching to the Jews, on the grounds that they have their own valid faith. Replacement theology, he maintained, died with the holocaust (with the unspoken suggestion that somehow this doctrine could have contributed to it).
This sounds like the “Two Covenant” or “Dual Covenant” theory taught by John Hagee. Hagee preaches another way of salvation for the Jew, which is in direct violation of Paul’s warnings in Galatians 1:6-9. That article can be found here:
http://www.pfo.org/jonhagee.htm
This issue raises a number of fundamental questions which strike at the heart of the gospel. Whatever view we take of Romans 11:26, it is clear that the way of salvation for Jews is, and will always be, the same as for all men — through Christ.
I've been saying this all along--there is only one way for anybody to be saved--through Christ.
That means that converted Jews are members of the church of Christ, not of a special ‘Jewish church’. Paul makes this clear when he says that in Christ ‘there is neither Jew nor Gentile’ (Galatians 3:28).
I agree with this too. Although when I first got saved, I was a member of a Messianic Congregation for about 10 years. They had worship services on Saturday (shabbat), but I still went to church on Sunday (and I got lambasted for that). I will post my testimony at the end of this post which will tell you why I left the Messianic movement. One of the main reasons I left was because the Messianic Jews were putting the Gentiles back under the law (Torah) and I saw many a Gentile believer really making an attempt to become "Jewish". More on that later.
Again, if we are not allowed to apply Old Testament passages concerning Israel to the church of Christ, it puts a wedge between the testaments, and suggests that the OT has no relevance to Christians.
This is expressly contradicted by our Lord, who told the Jews that they should find him in all the Scriptures, because they were about him (John 5:39).
This is not true--this is "forcing" Scripture to say what it doesn't mean. Before I got saved, the O.T. was the "Jewish" bible and the N.T. was the Gentile/Christian (I thought all Gentiles were Christians) bible. I went to a Bible bookstore and wanted to buy just an Old Testament because I didn't want a copy of that "Christian" Bible in my home. Needless to say, that clerk began to pray in earnest for my salvation. It was the O.T that opened my eyes to who Christ was--through reading some of the prophetic Psalms (like Psalm 22) and Isaiah 53. The church was a "mystery" in the O.T. and was revealed in the N.T. The O.T. spoke of CHRIST not the CHURCH.
John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and
they are they which testify of me.
The CHURCH is mentioned only twice in the Gospels (Matthew 16:18 and Matthew 18:17. The Church was not empowered until Pentecost (Acts 2).
The Old Testament is an integral part of the Christian Scriptures, not an optional addition. Even Abraham was saved through Christ — he rejoiced to see Christ’s day, and was glad (John 8:56).
The first statement is true and I agree. The New Testament is the fulfillment of the Old Testament. However, Abraham was not saved through Christ. "Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness."(Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:5). Old Testament saints were not called "Christians"--Abraham and all the other Old Testament saints did not have the Holy Spirit indwelling them as Christians do today.
According to Hebrews, the church and the gospel are the substance of the OT shadows, the realities behind the old covenant symbols. The old covenant between God and the Jewish nation was ‘ready to vanish away’ (Hebrews 8:13; 9:8-15).
It wasn't the church and the gospel which were the substance of the OT shadows--CHRIST IS the substance. The covenant between God and the Jewish nation was NOT "ready to vanish away". It was the Mosaic covenant which was "ready to vanish away" because it was only a temporary system given to prepare Israel for salvation-not given to overthrow her promises in the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants. Israel is still a nation.
Many of our hymns reflect this doctrine: ‘Glorious things of thee are spoken, Zion, city of our God!’ Are we prepared to throw all these away and admit they are the product of flawed theology?
Zion IS the city of our God! This doesn't mean that the Israel's promises and covenants are fulfilled in the Church! Many of our hymns today reflect flawed theology. The True Church is NOT True Israel--that's what is flawed.
We must hold fast to these truths which are integral to the gospel. We love the Jews for Christ’s sake, and long for their conversion — but we do them no service by failing to preach Christ from the Old Testament.
If you love the unsaved Jews for Christ's sake, then please don't preach this flawed theology--that the Church is Israel and all Israel's promises and covenants have been fulfilled in the Church--they won't buy it.
It would be ridiculous to view the heroes of faith in Hebrews 11 as belonging to a different religion and excluded from the church. Scripture denies any such thought for, says Hebrews 11:40, they will ‘not be made perfect apart from us’. With us, they will be made perfect, but only as members of Christ’s body, the church!
The heroes of faith were all OT saints--they didn't have a different religion and will rule and reign with Christ and the Church during the Millennium--but they are NOT the Church. The Church didn't begin until Pentecost. (Acts 2). The Church was a "mystery" in the OT and was revealed in the NT.
Christ’s kingdom is a heavenly one: the mistake the Jews made in his own day was to conceive of the promises in earthly terms.
God promised Israel an "earthly" Millennial Kingdom. The heavenly kingdom is the ETERNAL Kingdom. Chirst will rule and reign from the throne of David on this earth, in the city of Jerusalem, for 1,000 years.
It is this same erroneous theology which poses a great danger in the present situation. It distorts the search for peace and sidelines the gospel.
Search for peace? There will be NO true peace until Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace, returns from heaven, to rule and reign on this earth from Jerusalem for 1,000 years. As for sidelining the gospel--this flawed theology of the True Church is True Israel certainly has accomplished this by taking the focus off Christ and putting the focus on the theology of "theologians".
Here's part of my testimony:
In order not to lose their Jewish identity-and become assimilated into the “Gentile” church, Messianic Jews are separating themselves into Messianic congregations-who worship on the Shabbat (Sabbath) and consider Sunday worship something pagan!!! Also, when the Gentiles attend Messianic worship services, they are being told that they need to keep the Shabbat and the Law of Moses in order to keep their salvation. There is nothing which I dislike more than that of a Gentile trying to become “Jewish” The Gentiles are being put back under the Law!!!!!!!!!!!! In order to understand why this is happening, here is a brief explanation:
The first century church was made up mostly of Jews. After the apostles and disciples died, and the Gentiles came into the church, they brought with them some pagan practices-and eventually-at the time of Constantine-the “Jewish” church became paganized and unrecognizable to the Jewish people. So to speak, Jesus the Jewish Messiah became a Gentile to the Jewish people-and Christianity was the religion of the Gentiles. Now, when a Jewish person becomes born again, he/she desires to retain their “Jewish” identity and not become assimilated into the “Gentile” church. Many Jewish people, especially the ones coming from an Orthodox or Conservative Jewish background, are regarded as “dead” to their families when they become born again.. The families actually have a “funeral” and “bury” their family member/s. These people are NOT Jewish anymore because they have become one of “them”-meaning a Gentile/Christian. They are considered “meshumad”-which means “apostate” in Hebrew.