• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Trump's Orlando Rally

Status
Not open for further replies.

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LOL, well, I guess linking Koch propaganda is a refreshing change from Soros propaganda but the CATO "study" is garbage - not in the data necessarily but look who "interpreted" that:

Alex Nowrasteh
APSA Minority Fellowship Program Spring Applications Due Today – Meet MFP Fellow Michelangelo Landgrave

LOL, a second-generation "immigrant" and an illegal alien, don't trust THAT. Here's a much better study:

SHOCK: Report Shows Almost HALF of All Federal Crimes Committed by Non-Citizens in 2018 - Big League Politics

and then there's Arizona: Illegals commit crimes at double the rate of native-born: Study

not to mention the identity theft almost every adult commits after unlawful entry. I don't see why it's such a threat to acknowledge if you are capable of one crime, you're capable of a second or third or more. Of course, you know they NEVER commit voter fraud, not even the MS-15 types EVER. The MSM and the DNC have told me the poor downtrodden dears would never do that.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think we're talking about crimes committed in America after arrival. Your answer makes no sense and adds nothing.

Actually, it is you who do not uphold the laws of the USA. You talk about no immigration laws in the 19th century and then say the 21st century should not enforce over a century of laws regulating immigration. All you want is more money and total power because you think your way is best for you and nevermind about others. Illegal aliens are criminals under American law but you want money and power and do not want to obey the law.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Even if all of that was true, it doesn't matter. Illegal immigrants do not belong here and no Americans should be dying because they are. But then you do not care about the Americans that are dying at their hands.
What you're saying is we should only let immigrants in who are without sin. Where are you going to find them?
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Very good and I wholeheartedly agree with your synopsis on the issue. The Federal government is indeed in charge of protecting the nations borders, but because of some of the laws currently on the books it is now having some difficulty doing it.
We need bipartisan immigration reform.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What you're saying is we should only let immigrants in who are without sin. Where are you going to find them?

No, that is not what I am saying and reasonable people will read my post and know that. But what is disturbing is that you belittled the death of Americans with your intentional mischaracterization of my words. The murder of Americans by illegal immigrants means nothing to you. And that is exactly what I suspected.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, that is not what I am saying and reasonable people will read my post and know that. But what is disturbing is that you belittled the death of Americans with your intentional mischaracterization of my words. The murder of Americans by illegal immigrants means nothing to you. And that is exactly what I suspected.
The death of Americans relative to those from other countries is considered by most to be far more serious. Every life is precious to God. Yes, 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam but over 1 M Vietnamese died. That's a far worse tragedy for Vietnam than for America especially since we started the war.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What you're saying is we should only let immigrants in who are without sin. Where are you going to find them?

If we can't find any sinless ones, we won't let any in.

It would really kill the Democrats to pay fair wages and be forced to participate in honest elections not to mention have a costant stream of prostitutes of all ages and both genders.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The death of Americans relative to those from other countries is considered by most to be far more serious. Every life is precious to God. Yes, 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam but over 1 M Vietnamese died. That's a far worse tragedy for Vietnam than for America especially since we started the war.

We didn't start any war.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The death of Americans relative to those from other countries is considered by most to be far more serious. Every life is precious to God. Yes, 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam but over 1 M Vietnamese died. That's a far worse tragedy for Vietnam than for America especially since we started the war.

And thanks for proving my point.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You are delusional. We also invaded Afghanistan and Iraq to start those wars. We then occupied those countries.

You expose your ignorance. When we went into Iraq we were under a "cease fire". The war began when Suddam invaded a neighboring country unprovoked. We went in in 1991 due to that invasion. That war was not at and end when we went back in under G. Bush. We were only under a legal cease fire. We did not start that war. Suddam did.

Afghanistan, it was controlled by the Taliban which had taken it over against the people's will. The Taliban in Afghanistan were harboring the men who planned the 911 attack. I have only ever known people to suggest that we started a war there that were supportive of terrorists in some large or small fashion. We already know you care little about the deaths of Americans based on your posts in this thread.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You expose your ignorance. When we went into Iraq we were under a "cease fire". The war began when Suddam invaded a neighboring country unprovoked. We went in in 1991 due to that invasion. That war was not at and end when we went back in under G. Bush. We were only under a legal cease fire. We did not start that war. Suddam did.

Afghanistan, it was controlled by the Taliban which had taken it over against the people's will. The Taliban in Afghanistan were harboring the men who planned the 911 attack. I have only ever known people to suggest that we started a war there that were supportive of terrorists in some large or small fashion. We already know you care little about the deaths of Americans based on your posts in this thread.
I agree that the First Gulf War was in response to an attack on an ally. That was correct and I support GHW Bush's decision to not further pursue that war to occupy Iraq. I wasn't clear. I was talking about the Second Gulf War which was simply aggression mon our part. GW Bush didn't heed his father's warning and tried to occupy Iraq. We LOST the wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan and the second Iraq war. Bin Laden was from Saudi Arabia. His family was allow to leave the U.S. on 9/11 when all other air traffic was grounded. The government identified hijackers all were from Saudi Arabia and supported by SA and Pakistan. We actually had bin Laden cornered in Afghanistan. The special forces requested backup and their request was denied. Later GW Bush said bin Laden was no longer a priority target. Finally Obama took him out.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
[QUOTE="FollowTheWay, post: 2509997, member: 11730"I was talking about the Second Gulf War which was simply aggression mon our part. [/quote]

No it was not simply an aggression on our part. The entire world including dems thought Saddam had WMD's. Of course we later found the reminents of his WMD program. Still to this day no one can exlplain the convoy of trucks leaving Iraq prior to our going in. Saddam had refused over and over again to not let the international community inspect those areas known to have those WMD's.



.
We LOST the wars in Vietnam

Nope, we abandoned it.

, Afghanistan and the second Iraq war.

completely wrong. Sorry for your mistake.

Bin Laden was from Saudi Arabia. His family was allow to leave the U.S. on 9/11 when all other air traffic was grounded. The government identified hijackers all were from Saudi Arabia and supported by SA and Pakistan. We actually had bin Laden cornered in Afghanistan. The special forces requested backup and their request was denied. Later GW Bush said bin Laden was no longer a priority target. Finally Obama took him out.

Obama took him out for political reasons. Being from Saudi means nothing.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
[QUOTE="FollowTheWay, post: 2509997, member: 11730"I was talking about the Second Gulf War which was simply aggression mon our part.

No it was not simply an aggression on our part. The entire world including dems thought Saddam had WMD's. Of course we later found the reminents of his WMD program. Still to this day no one can exlplain the convoy of trucks leaving Iraq prior to our going in. Saddam had refused over and over again to not let the international community inspect those areas known to have those WMD's.



.

Nope, we abandoned it.



completely wrong. Sorry for your mistake.



Obama took him out for political reasons. Being from Saudi means nothing.[/QUOTE]
What is the name of the city that used to be named Saigon? Is it in a democracy or a communist country?
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No it was not simply an aggression on our part. The entire world including dems thought Saddam had WMD's. Of course we later found the reminents of his WMD program. Still to this day no one can exlplain the convoy of trucks leaving Iraq prior to our going in. Saddam had refused over and over again to not let the international community inspect those areas known to have those WMD's.



.

Nope, we abandoned it.



completely wrong. Sorry for your mistake.



Obama took him out for political reasons. Being from Saudi means nothing.
What is the name of the city that used to be named Saigon? Is it in a democracy or a communist country?[/QUOTE]

You Democrats were in power when Viet Nam was abandoned to the communists.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What is the name of the city that used to be named Saigon? Is it in a democracy or a communist country?

You Democrats were in power when Viet Nam was abandoned to the communists.[/QUOTE]
ARVN taking the lead and U.S. ground-force withdrawal
Vietnam War - Wikipedia


ARVN and US Special Forces, September 1968
Beginning in 1970, American troops were withdrawn from border areas where most of the fighting took place and instead redeployed along the coast and interior. US casualties in 1970 were less than half of 1969 casualties after being relegated to less active combat.[258] At the same time that US forces were redeployed, the ARVN took over combat operations throughout the country, with casualties double US casualties in 1969, and more than triple US ones in 1970.[259] In the post-Tet environment, membership in the South Vietnamese Regional Force and Popular Force militias grew, and they were now more capable of providing village security, which the Americans had not accomplished under Westmoreland.[260] In 1970 Nixon announced the withdrawal of an additional 150,000 American troops, reducing the number of Americans to 265,500.[258] By 1970 Viet Cong forces were no longer southern-majority, as nearly 70% of units were northerners.[261] Between 1969 and 1971 the Viet Cong and some NVA units had reverted to small unit tactics typical of 1967 and prior instead of nationwide grand offensives.[240] In 1971 Australia and New Zealand withdrew their soldiers, and U.S. troop count was further reduced to 196,700, with a deadline to remove another 45,000 troops by February 1972. The United States also reduced support troops, and in March 1971 the 5th Special Forces Group, the first American unit deployed to South Vietnam, withdrew to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.[262][A 5]

Fall of Saigon
Main article: Fall of Saigon
Further information: Operation Frequent Wind

Victorious NVA troops at the Presidential Palace, Saigon
Chaos, unrest, and panic broke out as hysterical South Vietnamese officials and civilians scrambled to leave Saigon. Martial law was declared. American helicopters began evacuating South Vietnamese, U.S., and foreign nationals from various parts of the city and from the U.S. embassy compound. Operation Frequent Wind had been delayed until the last possible moment, because of U.S. Ambassador Graham Martin's belief that Saigon could be held and that a political settlement could be reached.


Reunification parade following the Fall of Saigon, with the city being renamed Ho Chi Minh City
Schlesinger announced early in the morning of 29 April 1975 the evacuation from Saigon by helicopter of the last U.S. diplomatic, military, and civilian personnel. Frequent Wind was arguably the largest helicopter evacuation in history. It began on 29 April, in an atmosphere of desperation, as hysterical crowds of Vietnamese vied for limited space. Martin pleaded with Washington to dispatch $700 million in emergency aid to bolster the regime and help it mobilize fresh military reserves, but American public opinion had soured on the conflict.

President Gerald Ford had given a televised speech on 23 April, declaring an end to the Vietnam War and all U.S. aid. Frequent Wind continued around the clock, as North Vietnamese tanks breached defenses on the outskirts of Saigon. In the early morning hours of 30 April, the last U.S. Marines evacuated the embassy by helicopter, as civilians swamped the perimeter and poured into the grounds. Many of them had been employed by the Americans and were left to their fate.

On 30 April 1975, NVA troops entered the city of Saigon and quickly overcame all resistance, capturing key buildings and installations. A tank from the 324th Division crashed through the gates of the Independence Palace at 11:30 am local time and the Viet Cong flag was raised above it. President Dương Văn Minh, who had succeeded Huong two days earlier, surrendered to Colonel Bùi Tín.[284]

****************************************************************************************************

In December 1973, two months after the resignation of Spiro Agnew, Ford became the first person appointed to the vice presidency under the terms of the 25th Amendment by President Richard Nixon. After the subsequent resignation of President Nixon in August 1974, Ford immediately assumed the presidency. His 895 day-long presidency is the shortest in U.S. history for any president who did not die in office.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top