You have your liberal, moderate and conservative. They are not going to agree and homosexuality is only one of the issues. For instance, Rev. Joshua and I have debated over the literalness of the creation account in Gensis, we disagree. The bottom line is, whether or not the board is willing to draw lines as to whether or not the literalness of the Bible is an issue. It is NOT interpretation, it is a debate over whether or not the Bible should be taken literally on these issues. Liberals do not take certain portions literally and it this will always be a point of contention for those who do. So, whether we like it or not, the board has the right to draw its lines and people calling themselves Baptist, but are very liberal are obviously within those boundaries. The board is not condoning their opinion by letting them debate because as stated above they are 'right' in their minds. Where the problem lies is, how liberal do you allow things to change? Do we start serving beer at youth fellowships because that is the only way to get youth to come to church functions today? That is my opinion of the way liberal churches are headed, but I do not have a problem debating them because God's Word stands for itself and you either accept it or you don't and if you don't then God will deal with you and not man. I think if the debates are going to occur, a board such as this is the best place for it to happen since there are REAL disagreements and my 'truth' is not necessarily your 'truth'; only God's truth will remain constant. This is the reason I personally feel that homosexuality is a sin, but so is adultry and lying. This issue is so polarized that the believers in homosexuality have a real right to believe there are homosexual 'hate mongers'. I agree, I have met them, but not all Christians hate homosexuals any more than they hate drug addicts. They see them as sinners, like we all are without the blood of Christ.