Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yet two things may seem contradictory from man's perspective, but from God's they both can be true.
Yep.
....the doers of the law shall be justified Ro 2:13
....by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified... Ro 3:20
the doers of the law shall be justified
....the doers of the law shall be justified Ro 2:13
....by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified... Ro 3:20
....by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified... Ro 3:20
.......the doers of the law shall be justified Ro 2:13
The point Paul was making is that if the law must be kept at all
then all the law must be kept.
The point Paul was making is that if the law must be kept at all then all the law must be kept.
NOT even in the context!
Saying there be a contradiction without specific evidence can be deemed a falsehood.The context of Romans 2 is how one is justified by law then it is explained why this is impossible. You claimed that there is a contradiction.
You claimed that there is a contradiction.
Yet two things may seem contradictory from man's perspective, but from God's they both can be true.
The context of Romans 2 is how one is justified by law then it is explained why this is impossible.
The context of Romans 2 is how one is justified by law then it is explained why this is impossible.
IMO, you're demonstrating the same asinine aversion to any mention of 'works' that's common among evangelicals.
I believe in a faith that works.
For the record, I do not believe in faith and works.
The problem for them was there was no faith behind it.
I have heard Roman Catholic apologetics cite Romans 2:13 to support their works based salvation.
My question to them is, if this is a contradiction, do you really think Paul would be careless enough to say the doers of the law will be justified and then the very next chapter say nobody is justified by the law?
Perhaps we need to dig deeper to see the point he was trying to make.
It seems to me that you and I are on the same page in Romans 13. Jesus did say we fulfill the law if we love one another so it does refer to the law written on our hearts.
T
K. That's not what I'm doing. I'm trying to get you to see the 'intent' of the phrase 'doers of the law'. Do you think Paul is presenting a hypothetical here? That such a person doesn't exist? How about you? Are you a 'fulfiller of the law' as presented in Romans 13:8-10?
It's not apples and apples.
....the doers of the law shall be justified Ro 2:13
....by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified... Ro 3:20
The one is 'of the spirit', the other is 'of the letter' (2:29).
I assure you, if God has wrought within, circumcised your heart and placed His law upon it, you are a Jew inwardly, and a 'doer and fulfiller of the law'.
Yep.
2 All things therefore whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, even so do ye also unto them: for this is the law and the prophets. Mt 7
8 Owe no man anything, save to love one another: for he that loveth his neighbor hath fulfilled the law.
9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not covet, and if there be any other commandment, it is summed up in this word, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.
10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbor: love therefore is the fulfilment of the law. Ro 13
8 Howbeit if ye fulfil the royal law, according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself, ye do well: Ja 2
I think I'm recognizing the work of the Spirit in the context more than you are.
The problem for you is the subject of faith is nowhere to be found in Romans 2
I think I'm recognizing the work of the Spirit in the context more than you are.
The WHOLE context of Romans is how one is justified by FAITH, not by works of the law.
My interpretation is one that does not have a contradiction between two specific passages.
It's not apples and apples.
....the doers of the law shall be justified Ro 2:13
....by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified... Ro 3:20
The one is 'of the spirit', the other is 'of the letter' (2:29).
The WHOLE context of Romans is how one is justified by FAITH, not by works of the law.
There's a WHOOOOLE lot more to Paul's 'Gospel Of God' than justification by faith