• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Two Mass Killings in Two Days in North America

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I want to add that ISIS has advanced the tactics of criminals and madmen considerably if these aren't terrorist attacks. This is something ISIS will forever be remembered for by civilized society.
 

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That one didn't really take place.

Couldn't have. It was illegal for the suspect to have a gun.

I know its snark directed at those wanting to add more gun laws, but could you explain that in the future since you sound convincing. It even made me wonder to your intent, but I know you from your previous posts..
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
Not to diminish the pain and loss of their families, but 4 people dead is not a mass shooting by today's standards. A case of multiple homicide yes, mass shooting no.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not to diminish the pain and loss of their families, but 4 people dead is not a mass shooting by today's standards. A case of multiple homicide yes, mass shooting no.
Yeah, I agree. We had bar shootings with more than 4 people shot. Just drunks fighting and the losers start shooting.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I want to add that ISIS has advanced the tactics of criminals and madmen considerably if these aren't terrorist attacks. This is something ISIS will forever be remembered for by civilized society.
I doubt ISIS has advanced these tactics. What we are actually seeing, with the notable exception of Vegas, is lack of tactics. If "tactics" were applied, the casualties would be astronomically higher.
 
Last edited:

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not to diminish the pain and loss of their families, but 4 people dead is not a mass shooting by today's standards. A case of multiple homicide yes, mass shooting no.

I don't know if we should judge things by today's standards as much as the type of crime it is. Otherwise, the news deals with things so horrible we might lose perspective and possibly avoid it.

Also, the shooter has so far fulfilled some aspects of what are called spree killers. People with that kind of intent, along with terrorists, will make the news regardless of how few people they kill if they actually perpetrate such a heinous crime. I'm just saying that the heinousness of the crime and the mentality of the person perpetrating it should matter. It's easy to pull a gun in a dirty fight if you are losing, its very hard to make the kind of man who will go on a spree kill.
 

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I doubt ISIS has advanced these tactics. What we are actually see in, with the notable exception of Vegas, is lack of tactics. If "tactics" were applied, the casualties would be astronomically higher.

I take these things as being tactics from a conversation with an FBI Agent, who explained to me the importance of not advancing the tactics of criminals. He did so since I was training to be a counterterrorism analyst at one point in my life, and picked up a lot of terrorist tactics I started throwing around online. That is until two FBI Agents came to my door unannounced to explain the need to never give the enemy any ideas whatsoever. ISIS has driven the point home to me in two ways:

1. The use of cars as a deliberate weapon to mow down pedestrians.
2. The use of semi-automatic assault rifles to perpetrate mass shootings in public places.

Doesn't sound like much, but in counterterrorism this was being tracked since far superior tactics are proposed or known. Introducing these two things seems to have revolutionized the criminal on the street wanting to do a spree kill or terrorist act. That is as far as I know form news reports on terrorist attacks and mass shootings.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I take these things as being tactics from a conversation with an FBI Agent, who explained to me the importance of not advancing the tactics of criminals. He did so since I was training to be a counterterrorism analyst at one point in my life, and picked up a lot of terrorist tactics I started throwing around online. That is until two FBI Agents came to my door unannounced to explain the need to never give the enemy any ideas whatsoever. ISIS has driven the point home to me in two ways:

1. The use of cars as a deliberate weapon to mow down pedestrians.
2. The use of semi-automatic assault rifles to perpetrate mass shootings in public places.

Doesn't sound like much, but in counterterrorism this was being tracked since far superior tactics are proposed or known. Introducing these two things seems to have revolutionized the criminal on the street wanting to do a spree kill or terrorist act. That is as far as I know form news reports on terrorist attacks and mass shootings.
I never discuss tactics in detail on line. In my opinion El-quaida, ISIS, and their internet followers use terrible tactics. They are very inefficient and ineffective in what they do. They do an extremely poor job of selecting targets. They do a poor job of executing the attacks.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I take these things as being tactics from a conversation with an FBI Agent, who explained to me the importance of not advancing the tactics of criminals. He did so since I was training to be a counterterrorism analyst at one point in my life, and picked up a lot of terrorist tactics I started throwing around online. That is until two FBI Agents came to my door unannounced to explain the need to never give the enemy any ideas whatsoever. ISIS has driven the point home to me in two ways:

1. The use of cars as a deliberate weapon to mow down pedestrians.
2. The use of semi-automatic assault rifles to perpetrate mass shootings in public places.

Doesn't sound like much, but in counterterrorism this was being tracked since far superior tactics are proposed or known. Introducing these two things seems to have revolutionized the criminal on the street wanting to do a spree kill or terrorist act. That is as far as I know form news reports on terrorist attacks and mass shootings.

We need to ban cars. Problem solved.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Still waiting for more info on the Toronto attacker but looks like Reinking is a domestic terrorist
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As Dottie Rambo wrote, "This world has been a wilderness..." The American people refuse to provide widespread hospitalization for mental illness. And then we have high level people like Ob@ma and Hill@ry breaking federal law because they are untouchable.
 

Steven Yeadon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As Dottie Rambo wrote, "This world has been a wilderness..." The American people refuse to provide widespread hospitalization for mental illness.

I have a mental illness and hang out with mentally ill people.

In Florida if someone is suspected of being a danger to themselves or others they are "Baker Acted." This hospitalizes them for three days for an assessment. If they are determined to be dangerously mentally ill, they are given medication and taken to court to keep them until they are no longer an immediate danger. That or they can sign themselves into the hospital until they are deemed suitable for discharge.

The problem is after they stop being an immediate danger, they get released back into the world. Currently there are no laws stipulating mandatory outpatient care. Not only that, even if there were, outpatient is casual and designed for people doing pretty well.

There is no middle ground level of care between crisis in-patient and casual out-patient. That seems to be where people fall through the cracks to me. The reason I am given for why there is no middle ground care by mental health professionals is funding. They barely have enough for the current system, let alone adding something in the middle.

Just thought I would explain what seems to be going on.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have a mental illness and hang out with mentally ill people.

In Florida if someone is suspected of being a danger to themselves or others they are "Baker Acted." This hospitalizes them for three days for an assessment. If they are determined to be dangerously mentally ill, they are given medication and taken to court to keep them until they are no longer an immediate danger. That or they can sign themselves into the hospital until they are deemed suitable for discharge.

The problem is after they stop being an immediate danger, they get released back into the world. Currently there are no laws stipulating mandatory outpatient care. Not only that, even if there were, outpatient is casual and designed for people doing pretty well.

There is no middle ground level of care between crisis in-patient and casual out-patient. That seems to be where people fall through the cracks to me. The reason I am given for why there is no middle ground care by mental health professionals is funding. They barely have enough for the current system, let alone adding something in the middle.

Just thought I would explain what seems to be going on.
Ours get hospitalised for a minimum of 28 days
 
Top