Typical democrat position on the slaughter of the innocents

[OldRegular]

If I were a politician and really wanted a law passed and knew if it were a clean bill it would pass unanimously I certainly would not add a clause that I knew would kill that bill ... not would I appreciate others doing so.

The result is the trafficking victims are left out in the cold with no help coming their way. Any politician who really cares about them would not poison the bill.

Crabby you are disgusting and that is the truth.

You can spread that barnyard crap about how much you care about the poor, sick, and downtrodden, as thick as you want. But that is all it is, barnyard crap, because anyone who supports the slaughter of the unborn and the democrat-party-of-death doesn't care for anything.

You prove what I say above by continuing to accuse Republicans of not caring about trafficking victims but not a single word of condemnation from you for the democrats who don't care for the victims of trafficking or the unborn child. All you and they care about is the power of a Marxist state!

The rider to the bill does nothing, sadly, to stop or hinder abortion but YOU CRABTOWNBOY and most democrats have sold your soul to support BAAL'S altar for the slaughter of the unborn child that word, 'ABORTION', itself has become sacred to you!

Crabby you are disgusting and that is the truth.

 

[Don]

If I were a politician and really wanted a law passed and knew if it were a clean bill it would pass unanimously I certainly would not add a clause that I knew would kill that bill ... not would I appreciate others doing so.

The result is the trafficking victims are left out in the cold with no help coming their way. Any politician who really cares about them would not poison the bill.

In other words, you don't see the Democrats being at fault for this problem in any way, shape, or form.

Your opinion is duly noted.

 

[Zaac]

The bill was co-sponsored by eight democrats!!!

Don't democrats even read bills that they sponsor???

targus, it was written during the previous Congress. And reissued during the new Congress. The Dems say they were told by the GOP that nothing had changed at the time of the reissue but the GOP added the abortion funding language.

The Dems took their word that they hadn't changed anything. But they are still responsible for reading bills and should know what's in them before giving their okay.

 

[Crabtownboy]

In other words, you don't see the Democrats being at fault for this problem in any way, shape, or form.

Your opinion is duly noted.

The Democrats did not add the poison pill to the bill. So, no, it is not the Democrats fault the poison poll was added.

If the GOP really wanted the anti-human trafficking bill to pass they would not have added a killer clause.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Crabby you are disgusting and that is the truth.

You can spread that barnyard crap about how much you care about the poor, sick, and downtrodden, as thick as you want. But that is all it is, barnyard crap, because anyone who supports the slaughter of the unborn and the democrat-party-of-death doesn't care for anything.

You prove what I say above by continuing to accuse Republicans of not caring about trafficking victims but not a single word of condemnation from you for the democrats who don't care for the victims of trafficking or the unborn child. All you and they care about is the power of a Marxist state!

The rider to the bill does nothing, sadly, to stop or hinder abortion but YOU CRABTOWNBOY and most democrats have sold your soul to support BAAL'S altar for the slaughter of the unborn child that word, 'ABORTION', itself has become sacred to you!

Crabby you are disgusting and that is the truth.

Old, why do you continue to support a party that cares nothing for the living, other than the super rich ... a party that continues to pass or try to pass legislation that harms people, like taking away benefits from workers hurt on the job, or reduce or eliminate programs that feed hungry children ... on and on and on.

Old, I do not support abortion and neither do you. I support helping people in need, you do not. You are not pro-life, only pro-birth and once born you do not care how terrible their life is and you want no help for them.

If the rider does nothing, then way did the GOP add it?

 

[Revmitchell]

In other words, you don't see the Democrats being at fault for this problem in any way, shape, or form.

Your opinion is duly noted.

He does but he will not admit it. As a DNC operative he has his marching orders.

 

[OldRegular]

Old, why do you continue to support a party that cares nothing for the living, other than the super rich ... a party that continues to pass or try to pass legislation that harms people, like taking away benefits from workers hurt on the job, or reduce or eliminate programs that feed hungry children ... on and on and on.

I repeat Crabby you are disgusting and that is the truth.

You can spread that barnyard crap about how much you care about the poor, sick, and downtrodden, as thick as you want. But that is all it is, barnyard crap, because anyone who supports the slaughter of the unborn and the democrat-party-of-death doesn't care for anything.

You prove what I say above by continuing to accuse Republicans of not caring about trafficking victims but not a single word of condemnation from you for the democrats who don't care for the victims of trafficking or the unborn child. All you and they care about is the power of a Marxist state!

The rider to the bill does nothing, sadly, to stop or hinder abortion but YOU CRABTOWNBOY and most democrats have sold your soul to support BAAL'S altar for the slaughter of the unborn child. That word itself, 'ABORTION', has become sacred to you and the democrats!

Crabby you are disgusting and that is the truth.

Old, I do not support abortion and neither do you. I support helping people in need, you do not.

You have absolutely no idea whether I help people in need. All you care about is a Marxist state.

You are not pro-life, only pro-birth and once born you do not care how terrible their life is and you want no help for them.

I said earlier on this thread:

Originally Posted by OldRegular
Any Christian on this BB who says they are against slaughtering unborn children and supports the democrats is a liar and a blasphemer.

If the rider does nothing, then way did the GOP add it?

Because they did not want taxpayer money funding the slaughter of the unborn child. But you do, otherwise you would condemn the democrats for not supporting this bill to help stop trafficking of humans. Furthermore, Crabby, you prove that all that stuff you post about caring for the poor, the sick, and the downtrodden is barnyard crap or you would condemn the democrats for not supporting a Law that would help these very people you falsely claim to care about.

 

[Don]

The Democrats did not add the poison pill to the bill. So, no, it is not the Democrats fault the poison poll was added.

If the GOP really wanted the anti-human trafficking bill to pass they would not have added a killer clause.

That is seriously short-sighted and narrow-minded of you.

The Dems could have easily passed it, then dialed back provisions of it later. They could have easily passed it, and let Obama veto it.

The GOP really wanted it to pass; they knew they would meet opposition from the Dems. The GOP may have poisoned it; but it was the Dems who killed it.

 

[Crabtownboy]

That is seriously short-sighted and narrow-minded of you.

The Dems could have easily passed it, then dialed back provisions of it later. They could have easily passed it, and let Obama veto it.

The GOP really wanted it to pass; they knew they would meet opposition from the Dems. The GOP may have poisoned it; but it was the Dems who killed it.

You seem to be saying the Republicans are not smart enough to know what there were doing. I'll think on that. Maybe you are right.

 

[777]

Still not dead, the Democrats are filibustering it but it's getting in the way of the Loretta Lynch confirmation vote.

The entire bill was published publicly on January 13th but the Democrats just noticed it last Monday and that's what's "dumb" here. The abortion language was on page 4, so the moral of the story could be not to co-sponsor and vote on a bill you can't be bothered to read beforehand.

 

[Don]

You seem to be saying the Republicans are not smart enough to know what there were doing. I'll think on that. Maybe you are right.

If that's really what you got from what I posted, then you must think the democrats are idiots.

 

[Don]

Still not dead, the Democrats are filibustering it but it's getting in the way of the Loretta Lynch confirmation vote.

The entire bill was published publicly on January 13th but the Democrats just noticed it last Monday and that's what's "dumb" here. The abortion language was on page 4, so the moral of the story could be not to co-sponsor and vote on a bill you can't be bothered to read beforehand.

Thanks for the update.

 

[OldRegular]

You seem to be saying the Republicans are not smart enough to know what there were doing. I'll think on that. Maybe you are right.

The rider to the bill does nothing, sadly, to stop or hinder abortion but YOU CRABTOWNBOY and most democrats have sold your soul to support BAAL'S altar for the slaughter of the unborn child. That word itself, 'ABORTION', has become sacred to you and the democrats!

 

[OldRegular]

He more represents the Jesus of the Bible than the majority of you on this board. So I don't mind being grouped with him.:jesus:

So according to you Jesus was an abortionist?

 

[OldRegular]

If that's really what you got from what I posted, then you must think the democrats are idiots.

He are ONE!

 

[OldRegular]

targus, it was written during the previous Congress. And reissued during the new Congress. The Dems say they were told by the GOP that nothing had changed at the time of the reissue but the GOP added the abortion funding language.

The Dems took their word that they hadn't changed anything. But they are still responsible for reading bills and should know what's in them before giving their okay.

Undoubtedly, given Zaac's close relations with all the democrats in the Senate, the above is the absolute truth.

 

[Crabtownboy]

The rider to the bill does nothing, sadly, to stop or hinder abortion but YOU CRABTOWNBOY and most democrats have sold your soul to support BAAL'S altar for the slaughter of the unborn child. That word itself, 'ABORTION', has become sacred to you and the democrats!

You lie again.

And again you say nothing to show you support the innocent alive or anything to show you want to help the poor, the hungry, the homeless. You have no regard for the innocent living. You are not pro-life, just pro-birth. Once born, forget and do not support them. Let them live in misery is your motto.

 

[OldRegular]

I am missing something here.

How is it harmful to a bill that provides funding for stopping human trafficking to include a clause that the funds may not be used for things other than stopping human trafficking?

Is it really the Dems intention to use the money not for stopping human trafficking but for abortions instead?

How does including a condition that money provided for "A" many not be used for "X" change anything?

Because as I said somewhere the democrats have sold their soul to Baal and will celebrate the slaughter of the unborn child as long as breath remains in their bodies. Now if it were an animal that would be a different story!

 

[Crabtownboy]

Because as I said somewhere the democrats have sold their soul to Baal and will celebrate the slaughter of the unborn child as long as breath remains in their bodies. Now if it were an animal that would be a different story!

And you continue to praise the party of death and misery for the living. You are not pro-life, just pro-birth. You support the party who is concerned only with the rich. The poor and those in need mean nothing to you. Some of us are concerned about both.

 

[JonC]

Some of us are concerned about both.
[/SIZE]

Hey CTB,
Are you saying it is OK to support the Democrat Party, acknowledging the evil and immorality that they openly embrace as a platform, because the Republican Party is also immoral? Or are you saying we shouldn’t support either? If the latter, then I see your point.