Oh, the contempt of court? Yes, that's a crimeWhat crime was he jailed for?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Oh, the contempt of court? Yes, that's a crimeWhat crime was he jailed for?
Assuming that is directed at me, I can assure you that I don't deny the truth of Scripture.I find the idea of people calling themselves "Christians" denying the plain truth of scripture as vile.
Welcome whom? Nazis? No thanks..you can keep your own in Charlottesville and add Yaxley-Lennon to your little collection of far right wingnuts. Please take him....because decent, civilised Christians don't want himYou welcome them. Man up to it.
In this instance, What crime was he jailed for?When? The ABH? The drugs? The beating his girlfriend? The mortgage fraud? When is enough enough? You tell me where the red line of a custodial sentence should be drawn
You prefer Muslim terrorists.Welcome whom? Nazis? No thanks..you can keep your own in Charlottesville and add Yaxley-Lennon to your little collection of far right wingnuts. Please take him....because decent, civilised Christians don't want him
Criminal or Civil? The information being reported is civil contempt.Let me spell.it out for you again:
Contempt
Of
Court
From Wikipedia:Criminal or Civil? The information being reported is civil contempt.
Criminal contempt of court
The Crown Court is a superior court of recordunder the Senior Courts Act 1981 and accordingly has power to punish for contempt of its own motion. The Divisional Court has stated that this power applies in three circumstances:
Where it is necessary to act quickly the judge (even the trial judge) may act to sentence for contempt.
- Contempt "in the face of the court" (not to be taken literally; the judge does not need to see it, provided it took place within the court precincts or relates to a case currently before that court);
- Disobedience of a court order; and
- Breaches of undertakings to the court.
Truth offends you?No. Stop playing that stupid game. It does you no credit and bankrupted whatever argument you think you have
People have a right to be a Nazi if they so choose. The problem is the Nazis are already within the borders. You welcome the Islamic terrorists with open arms.Of course, smallpox is extinct. But, then again, we thought that of Nazism. Sadly, it seems it has been resurrected like a macabre deadly zombie in both your country and mine...and possibly has infected certain individuals on this board, regrettably, with its vile humours. You could of course disabuse me of this fear by unequivocally denouncing Yaxley-Lennon and the odious ideology for which he stands and against which our grandfathers fought nobly and sacrificially some 75 years ago and thus show yourself to be a real Christian
He did not commit a crime. He posted facts to Facebook his attorney says he can prove were already in the public domain.From Wikipedia:
Yaxley-Lennon, knowingly and deliberately (by his own admission) fell foul of # 1 and #2
what a mess this whole thing is - can't see how the UK doesn't find him guilty after he admitted he had been in contempt:
Tommy Robinson jailed after breaking contempt of court laws
he claims he didn't understand or admit, now he's free on bail awaiting the retrial. This whole idea of not reporting on an ongoing trial is weird to Americans, with courtTV and all.
I thought he dropped the old name to protect his family and friends, but it looks like he did it to honor some soccer team. Just FTR, he wasn't "beating his girlfriend", she was another druggie with the same political bent:
Evidence of Bad Character
I find the idea of people who call themselves Christians supporting this individual particularly repugnant
Nope. Let me know when you find some.Truth offends you?