You mean you'r saying there not the same thing. Grace is love in action!The second one deals with God's grace, not love.
There is actually no indication they will not eventually have another opportunity either! What about other scriptures that say they will? Like Romans 5:19You miss the whole point of the parable. If these, who want to enter the kingdom, are not prime to believe on the spot, then when do they return. There is ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATION that they will have another opportunity.
What is the purpose of belief for you? I don't see how I undermine it at all!What is the purpose of belief, then? Don't you see that you totally undermine it?
Romans 5:9There is ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATION that the opportunity will go on indefinitely
It shows how some people seemingly without hope, can be saved in the long run.Okay. And you get universalism from that? And do ignore all conditional statements in the Bible?
I try to engage the most relavent posts! The're not tough for me if I don't believe them. I read all your posts addressed to me! If you have any others that are relevant, you can address me to them. I wasn't trying to attack you personally for not reading my scriptures, I just noticed they were ignored when you accused me of ignoring yours!I can't believe you. I engage your posts and address your Scriptures. You do not do the same courtesy for me. You ignore any tough spots and ignore the Scripture and evidence contrary to your position. I don't even know if you read half my posts, because you never respond to them.
Well, I don't either!Okay, if you say so. I don't ignore parts of the Bible because I don't like them
Yes, but when you ask a question like you did, you are implying it would be so under those circumstances. I find it ironic that you think God would be mean for applying remedial punishment, but not eternal, unending punishment!First off, I statement is: God is mean for giving remedial punishment. I believe I asked you a question. Big difference. Second, it was to point out your inconsistencies. How can one pay for sins that Christ has paid for?
Well, I worded my response wrong. I know everyone's sins are paid for, but the atonement is not applied in this life or the next unless received. I've read all your posts about this. For some reason, you just don't believe that a God of love would allow anyone another chance to receive Him in the next life. I think there is something highly illogical about the statement that people do not go to hell because of their sins but because they reject Christ. I think you need to rethink that one. If mankind had never sinned, they never would have needed a Savior. It's difficult to see how ones failure to understand their need to receive a free gift of mercy and grace would be more heinous than the sins that caused this need to start with. It doesn't make any sense to me. Certainlly we need a Savior, but it's because of our sins!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sins are not already paid for if one enters the next life unsaved! They havn't received the gift. Remember! It must be received. Didn't you say that someplace? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know you don't read my posts. I have held from the beginning that people do not go to hell for their sins, but for rejecting Christ. I have clearly showed this on page one. Everyone's sins are paid for. That is what Christ came for. The free gift is eternal life. Christ has done all the work so that God may remain just and offer this free gift to all men. It is a matter of reception or rejection now.
You either can't or won't understand something here! Certainlly, Christ took away the sin of the world! But, like you say it has to eventually be received. If not judgment awaits. Judgment for sin is not endless torture like you say. You believe Christ has to be received in this life in order to avoid hell, don't you? Well, I believe He has to be received in this life or the next in order to avoid remedial punishment. This will come a lot easier for some than others. Some will need the sternest of descipline.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hell is the purging, remedial , loving correction employed by God to bring sinners back to Himself!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you do not believe that Christ took away the sin of the world.
This is rather vague, I don't quite follow you here.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think rejecting the gift of love makes God love any less. And how in the world can you say that rejecting God is not a sin? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, do you? Actually, I can say it quite easily. I open my mouth and say the words. (You asked the wrong question, you should as 'why?') It is no more a sin that receiving Christ is a good work on our part.
Well, I tried too! When I said "I can come close" I meant I couldn't show anything about the "lake of fire" par say but could show the same parallel from other scriptures that just mentioned "fire" The fire is all symbolic anyway, it's just used in different ways in different scriptures.You didn't 'show' me. You made a connection that is strained at best with one other passage of Scripture. What of all the rest? And when I asked for clear evidence, you posted this response in question with I believe the statement, "I can come close." So you yourself admit that it is not clear.
Because sometimes we are so stubborn that we close our eyes and ears to the plain truth. Jesus spoke about those who "had no eyes to see or no ears to here" When you say that my proof is like a conspiracy theory, I think your just tired.Why would you need to try so hard if it was so clear? Wouldn't God want to make this great news as clear as possible? Your 'proof' is more like a conspiracy theory.
I'm not an oxymoron Neil. Your twisting what I'm trying to say.And isn't this an oxymoron, "clearly implied?" Could not rejecting the Holy Spirit's work and conviction be a problem for a person? Is it not the Holy Spirit that reveals truth to a person? What if a person rejects that revelation? Seems to me that Christ is making it clear that all sins can be forgiven except speaking against the Holy Spirit. I would classify rejecting the Holy Spirit's work and a form of speaking against Him. And I love the way you put your own clause on this. Christ clearly says that something will not be forgiven. Yet you say it will, eventually. Classic
Matthew 12:31-32 (ESV)
Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. [32] And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
I believe if this scripture says that if there is one sin that won't be forgiven in this age or the age to come then all other sins can be forgiven. "every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people"! So there you have every other sin capable of being forgiven even in the next age! So, what does it mean for people who blaspheme against the Holy Spirit when they enter the next age? They can't be forgiven, so they undergo the just punishment for their sin. The're not like those who enter the next life and immediatelly see their need for repentance and are thus saved. People who are saved immediatelly have no need for any further punishment. But the ones resisting the Holy Spirit, are stubborn and therefore need the sternist of descipline. But once they receive this, they are now able to come back to their loving God. You see, you've been so conditioned to see hell as a place of only endless torture, that its hard for you to understand anything else. When the Bible contrasts God with human beings it always shows how imminantelly better He is than us. We don't put people away forever in this country, not even in Texas, unless its murder, and then its only for a lifetime.
Well, some of that is unfair, but I do agree we ought to be through. You can have the last word!Thank-you for finally addressing a few of my verses that I post to the contrary. However, you came into the ballgame late and I am getting tired. I have tried to point by point address your posts and do not get that in return. Go back, read the entire thing, and post specific responses if you don't mind. Not, "You don't think God is love" or "You think God tortures people." Give me some substance, please. We have gone round and round for 14 pages and have really gotten nowhere. I don't see much in the way of engaging opposing evidence from the universalists side, so until then, I am about through. Have fun everyone!