Which in no where found in the scriptures!Pretty much every non-Calvinist avers the will is free.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Which in no where found in the scriptures!Pretty much every non-Calvinist avers the will is free.
In regard to being a slave to sin, i would say that's not true. Ever Non-cal that i know Believes that we are Slave to Sin prior to the new birth and subsequent indwelling of the Holy Spirit.Pretty much every non-Calvinist avers the will is free.
You're reading into the white spaces between the black lettersYes, but ONLY after God had regenerated him to be able to do that! The one who hated Jesus as a false messaih and killed off Christians did not jusdt decide to wake up and do that by Himself!
If we’re slaves to sin, it’s our master(Satan). Slaves are not free. Only the Christ can set us free, and that includes the will.In regard to being a slave to sin, i would say that's not true. Ever Non-cal that i know Believes that we are Slave to Sin prior to the new birth and subsequent indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
Why would Saul who HATED Jesus and his followers, all of a sudden have a change of heart and mind by himself? Why did John Newton?If we’re slaves to sin, it’s our master(Satan). Slaves are not free. Only the Christ can set us free, and that includes the will.
Right, i do not know any non-cals that would disagree with that.If we’re slaves to sin, it’s our master(Satan). Slaves are not free. Only the Christ can set us free, and that includes the will.
LOL! So this is the way you influence a discussion by having a picture of 9 thumbs up supporting Cassidy's opinion? Very well. But look below! There's 19, twice as many giving it a thumbs down. Guess our side of the argument wins the case!
That is what "free will" means. The lost man is free to choose Christ apart from regeneration.I did not communicate my thoughts clearly. I meant who claims that it is free. sorry about that.
They do, as yo see us able to freewill ourselves to salvation!Right, i do not know any non-cals that would disagree with that.
But they keep saying they have free will.Right, i do not know any non-cals that would disagree with that.
Not found in the Bible.That is what "free will" means. The lost man is free to choose Christ apart from regeneration.
Ahhhh, probably because the disconnect is in the definitions. To ME, freewill is not the same thing as saying we have a will that is free. Maybe that's an error on my part?But they keep saying they have free will.
There’s a disconnect somewhere...
Then why call it free will?Ahhhh, probably because the disconnect is in the definitions. To ME, freewill is not the same thing as saying we have a will that is free. Maybe that's an error on my part?
Please expound what you meant here. Thanks bunches.How did they sin?
How can a person save themselves? Who claims that?They do, as yo see us able to freewill ourselves to salvation!
Those who say they believed prior to being saved. Believing and conversion happen simultaneously, with God authoring both their belief(faith) and salvation,How can a person save themselves? Who claims that?
The ones who claim that we first believe, then get regerated by God!Those who say they believed prior to being saved. Believing and conversion happen simultaneously, with God authoring both their belief(faith) and salvation,
That is what "free will" means. The lost man is free to choose Christ apart from regeneration.
Just how many of these threads have I started, Tom? I have been here 16 years and have just over 3.7K posts. I am hardly a troll. And, there has never been a question in those 16 years that you have asked that I could not answer. There are many that have been strawmen that I have chosen to ignore. You have a knack for twisting words and making statements into something that was neither said nor implied. I shake my head every time, because I feel that you're smarter than that. I have never been one who had to resort to bullying tactics.And there is the problem, Bob. You start these threads and when you are asked a question you can't answer you make a false claim of "strawman."
You're wrong. I don't have to have it both ways. I'm not the one who designed the plan of salvation.If the Atonement is for all, all sins are paid for, and everybody goes to heaven. You can't have it both ways.
According to you, this a "blatant personal attack." Are you going to report this post or do you want me to?And this is what happens when you try to adjust the bible to fit your theology instead of the other way around. Now you are claiming the blood atonement is NOT the blood atonement. One of the great heresies in Christendom a few decades ago was the denial of the atoning blood of Christ. And here you are denying the atoning blood of Christ.
I agree 100%. To say that the blood atonement is limited to a particular group of human beings is equally terrible heresy, in my humble opinion.To deny the blood atonement is a terrible heresy.
You're arguing with yourself here, Tom. You're the one who pointed out (however needlessly) that Romans 10:13 is talking about salvation. I was just agreeing with you.Again, Bob, you demonstrate a lack of understanding of what scripture is saying.