• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Vaccine and Ingredients

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I missed it. I saw you side step it and discuss medical advancement.
That’s what they teach in the government, to step over the corpses of the people that have been murdered and it’s called advancement… for that is the cost of mistakes made, the ultimate sacrifice is innocence. Dickens warned about the results of it… “ They are Man’s and they cling to me, appealing from their fathers. This boy is Ignorance and this girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy for on his brow I see that written is Doom, unless this writing is erased.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I missed it. I saw you side step it and discuss medical advancement.
It is there. The world is the world. Governments and politics are still a part of the powers of the world. Politics change, but they also remain the sane in many ways.

That said, the government did not develop these vaccines. And the technology has changed. Your argument is like saying women should not have children because your great great grandmother died giving birth in 1895.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is there. The world is the world. Governments and politics are still a part of the powers of the world. Politics change, but they also remain the sane in many ways.

That said, the government did not develop these vaccines. And the technology has changed. Your argument is like saying women should not have children because your great great grandmother died giving birth in 1895.
Mu argument is nothing like that.
My argument is that if the Govt 60 years ago would marginalize and attempt to downplay the shortcomings of science, the much more corrupt govt today will do the same.

It is most Ironic that you take offense to anyone defining your argument, yet that is what you constantly do. You always define the opposing position wrong; unintentionally I hope. You are full aware I was referencing the Govt aspect of this particular point. You answered using a diversion into the science aspect. You were called on it and you still insist you answered the question you were asked. You didn't.
 

Wingman68

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Fauci, mRNA Vaccines, and the Connection to the Wuhan Institute of Virology

I am reposting this on it’s own, may have gotten lost in the last post. Here Fauci talks up switching to mRNA vaxes in 2017. They NEEDED this very scenario to make it happen, because nobody wanted it before. Too much resistance to it’s use. Now, you can’t resist is the plan. What a coup. What a grand experiment. Rolling, rolling, rolling………to what end? The Fauci’s, globalists of this world just rolled the dice. The house always wins.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Fauci, mRNA Vaccines, and the Connection to the Wuhan Institute of Virology

I am reposting this on it’s own, may have gotten lost in the last post. Here Fauci talks up switching to mRNA vaxes in 2017. They NEEDED this very scenario to make it happen, because nobody wanted it before. Too much resistance to it’s use. Now, you can’t resist is the plan. What a coup. What a grand experiment. Rolling, rolling, rolling………to what end? The Fauci’s, globalists of this world just rolled the dice. The house always wins.
Explains why J and J is the red headed step child.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Mu argument is nothing like that.
My argument is that if the Govt 60 years ago would marginalize and attempt to downplay the shortcomings of science, the much more corrupt govt today will do the same.

It is most Ironic that you take offense to anyone defining your argument, yet that is what you constantly do. You always define the opposing position wrong; unintentionally I hope. You are full aware I was referencing the Govt aspect of this particular point. You answered using a diversion into the science aspect. You were called on it and you still insist you answered the question you were asked. You didn't.
Take offense? :Laugh

I do not take offense to anybody defining my argument.

I just do not believe that the effectiveness of the vaccine is dependent on our government.

Last I heard the Pfizer vaccine originated with BioNTech and was developed by German scientists.

You view my constant "diversion" into the "science aspect" as refusing to answer your question about whether government has changed in the last 65 years. In some ways government has, in other ways it has not. I do not get your point. I'm talking about vaccines - not governments.
 
Top