Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It is a great mistake to give a man who has not been convicted of sin certain passages that were never meant for him. The Law is what he needs . . . Do not offer the consolation of the gospel until he sees and knows he is guilty before God. We must give enough of the Law to take away all self-righteousness. I pity the man who preaches only one side of the truth-always the gospel, and never the Law.
God's grace cannot be faithfully preached to unbelievers until the Law is preached and man's corrupt nature is exposed. It is impossible for a person to fully realize his need for God's grace until he sees how terribly he has failed the standards of God's Law.
Not "done away with," but "fulfilled."
This is the type of confusion that dispensationalism creates. The Law is still the Law, it is still God's commands to mankind concerning moral righteousness, nothing has changed in that regard. It never was a means of salvation, but always was and still is our rule of behavior toward God and man.So that means that the 'law" for us today under this current Dispensation would be to keep abding in Christ, walking in the HS, and THAT would be fulfilling the requirements God demands for believers today!
This is the type of confusion that dispensationalism creates. The Law is still the Law, it is still God's commands to mankind concerning moral righteousness, nothing has changed in that regard. It never was a means of salvation, but always was and still is our rule of behavior toward God and man.
Google "three uses of the law".
So was it the 10 Commandments or the 10 Just Kiddings?Jesus death on the Cross fulfilled totally the requirements of the law, as he nailed ALL of its ordinances once held by God against us on the Cross...
it is finished, why go back under its bondage, as we NOW live by Grace of God, not by keeping the law, as jesus already perfectly kept it for us, and we are credit by god with His rightousness!
So was it the 10 Commandments or the 10 Just Kiddings?
This is the type of confusion that dispensationalism creates. The Law is still the Law, it is still God's commands to mankind concerning moral righteousness, nothing has changed in that regard. It never was a means of salvation, but always was and still is our rule of behavior toward God and man.
On this point, J.D. and I are in agreement. However, I would only add that if the law remains the motivator for moral behavior it will leave you dry spiritually. The law, obligation and fear may have an important role in the beginning of ones walk with Christ, but don't be content there.
True love drives out fear. True grace and relationship fulfills the law. It's like with my own earthly father. I used to obey his will because I feared his belt, or wanted his allowance. Now, when he calls I don't fear his belt or look for pay, I serve him as a friend. I'm motivated from love, not law. I want to help him out of relationship, not fear of punishment or the seeking of His reward. Make sense?
"No longer do I call you servant, but friends." John 15:15
Yes, I agree, if you are not implying that we obey the law only through Christ vicariously (positionaly) and not in actual practice.They reveal to us the Holiness of God, convict us of just HOW sinful we are compared to those standards, that is their main puropose, drive us to realise need the Messiah...
He fully kept the Holy law perfectly in our stead , and when God credits to us that perfect roightousness of Christ, in a sense, we DO and ARE keeping the 10 Commandments!
We now in Age of grace to abide in Christ, empowered by his HS, and when that happens, we will be "keeping" the commandments of God!
Well, that is one of the effects of the new birth - an embracing of God's Law, not in letter or perfection, but in spirit, desire.On this point, J.D. and I are in agreement. However, I would only add that if the law remains the motivator for moral behavior it will leave you dry spiritually. The law, obligation and fear may have an important role in the beginning of ones walk with Christ, but don't be content there.
True love drives out fear. True grace and relationship fulfills the law. It's like with my own earthly father. I used to obey his will because I feared his belt, or wanted his allowance. Now, when he calls I don't fear his belt or look for pay, I serve him as a friend. I'm motivated from love, not law. I want to help him out of relationship, not fear of punishment or the seeking of His reward. Make sense?
"No longer do I call you servant, but friends." John 15:15
Most disputes about the 10 Commandment proceed immediately to the Sabbath, the 1 of 10 that is most controversial. My own view of it is not whether one is a sabbatarian or not, but whether one says, "HOW does does commandment apply to me?", rather than saying, "DOES this commandment apply to me?", simply blowing it off as if God's Law could be disregarded.Jesus fulfilled the letter of the law and nailed its ordinances to His cross. As Christians, we are not under the Mosaic Law. We are under the Law of Christ, which is the spirit of the Law.
We no longer observe a Sabbath ordinance. It has been fulfilled. We have now entered into His rest, and every day is holy to Him.
We no longer follow the tithing commands of counting every tenth land animal and crop and giving them to a Levite or poor and following the seven-year cycle. These have all been fulfilled in Christ, Our High Priest after the order of Melchizedek. Our admonition now is to give cheerfully, abundantly, and freely to target specific needs, whether of finances, food, or service.
We no longer offer animal sacrifices. They have been fulfilled. We now recognize the finality and sufficiency of the perfect substitutionary sacrifice of the Lamb of God once for all.
All ordinances of the law have been fulfilled--not simply "done away with." We keep the law by following its spirit in its fulfillment in the Law of Christ. The Law was never to save, but rather to expose our depravity and point to Christ and His salvation.
Keep in mind the issue in Galatia was circumcision, a ceremonial aspect of the Law, not moral. That Old Covenant sign was a shadow of the "real" circumcision in the New Covenant's circumcision of the heart.Apostle paul though tells us thru the Galatians letter that ww who received HS by faith alone, and that the HS is ONEworking in and through us to fulfill will of God...
Why go back under Law, those of us now under grace?
Those whose will is to abide in Christ by submitting to the Lord each day WILL be doing what God requires
The Law could not do that, was not meant to, at though It is perfect, we are not!
True. :thumbs:Well, that is one of the effects of the new birth - an embracing of God's Law, not in letter or perfection, but in spirit, desire.
Keep in mind the issue in Galatia was circumcision, a ceremonial aspect of the Law, not moral. That Old Covenant sign was a shadow of the "real" circumcision in the New Covenant's circumcision of the heart.
:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:Most disputes about the 10 Commandment proceed immediately to the Sabbath, the 1 of 10 that is most controversial. My own view of it is not whether one is a sabbatarian or not, but whether one says, "HOW does does commandment apply to me?", rather than saying, "DOES this commandment apply to me?", simply blowing it off as if God's Law could be disregarded
In this new disoensation of the Age of Grace?