My apologies for taking so long to come back to you. I have three sermons to compose in short order.
Excuses excuses.
Time to learn a new tune.
Also, I briefly lost the will to live when I saw nine replies to my last post!
Yes because detailed responses to arguments just shouldn't take place on a Doctrinal Discussion Forum.
Not my fault that the Facebook crowd has taken over this forum.
With respect, that is not debate, it is spamming.
First, it is not respect you are showing, far from it.
Secondly, every response is generated in each post, nothing is copy and pasted, unless it is a quote from a previous post that has relevance toa point.
Third, your hypocrisy on this point makes me sick. It's okay if you do a long post, filled with Scripture references nobody is going to take the time to look at. It's odd that you actually delete the Scripture from a debate. But then it's not really a debate, is it. You would have to have more than one verse to support your view in order for debate to take place.
{QUOTE="Martin Marprelate"] The teaching that Jesus is the Christ is at the heart of the Gospel. It is what the Lord Jesus and the Apostles taught.
John 4:25-26; 11:27; 20:31; Acts 2:36; 8:5; 9:20-22; 16:31; 18:5, 28.
I've already addressed this, numerous times, in numerous threads. If you set your contempt aside and understood why that guy was poor, you might see this is irrelevant to the discussion at this point.
The Father revealed to men that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of the Living God, but, we know for certain that this is not the same as trusting in Christ as having died for us:
Matthew 16:20-23
King James Version (KJV)
20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
Peter knew Jesus was the Messiah, but, that doesn't change the fact that...
1. Christ charges them that they...tell no man. So much for the disciples preaching Christ, much less Christ crucified...which is the Gospel;
2. It was at that time the Lord began to show unto the disciples...the Gospel;
3. Peter is in opposition to...the Gospel. Training? Hardly, they were not privy to the Mystery of the Gospel;
4. The Lord charges him with not savoring the things which be of God...the Gospel;
5. The Lord charges him with savoring the things which be of men.
Yet you teach him as born again.
So if that is the case, then we must equally conclude that men can be born again rejecting the Gospel, they do not need to know about Christ dying on the Cross in their stead, and they do not have to have the eternal indwelling of God.
I don't find such a gospel in Scripture.
And you're welcome in advance for the avalanche you are about to be snowed under by.
Continued...