Akjo repeatedly said "Natters, no proof!"
I have provided proof, you have simply rejected it. I have given first-hand evidence, and you (like all honest investigators and judges when examining evidence) have rejected first-hand evidence so you can cling to 4th-hand evidence.
Askjo said "You have REAL problem with Westcott's own writing. Let's look at what Westcott WROTE: "The 'bosom of the Father' (like Heaven) is a state and not a place." Westcott quotation shows that he does NOT believe in it."
I see you've been reading the slanderer Waite (or reading another slanderer that read the slanderer Waite). Waite is notorious for twisting quotes completely out of context. Do you have the context of that 4th-hand quote? Do you know what else Westcott said about heaven? Have you read the book this quote comes from?
Askjo said "You have REAl problem with Hort's own writing. Look at what Hort WROTE: "Paul speaks of God as enabling him to have an inner vision and perception of His Son.." Your problem here is HERESY! An inner vision could NOT have blinded Paul.
Again relying on a fellow slanderer for your information. Do you have the context of that 4th-hand quote? Have you read the book this quote comes from? Do you realize that this quote is about Paul's understanding at the event, and Hort is not saying it precludes or replaces the external event? BTW, the external light was not what blinded Paul. I'll let you figure out why.
Askjo said "The Scripture said to YOU, "FALSE WITNESS"!"
No it didn't.
Askjo said "Michelle and I know they are not in Heaven. I agree with Michelle's comment, "Only God knows if their hearts changed prior to their death.""
Those are contradictory statements. How can you know they are not in heaven if you don't know if God changed their hearts prior to their death? Verily, thou art confused.
Askjo said "You have no proof to refute her."
I have provided first-hand proof.
Askjo said "You said W/H are false witnesses because you disagree with their writing."
What are you talking about?
Askjo said "Is your phonebook the Words of God? WOW! You mock God's Words. On other word, you blaspheme God's Words."
No, I did not say my phonebook is the Words of God. I was simply pointing out the fallacy of your reasoning that said that something was the Words of God if it did not affect any doctrines.
Askjo said "Your comment contradicts with the Scriptures: John 5:45-47."
No it doesn't.
Askjo said "That is very obvious to show YOU ignore the evidences."
Quite the contrary. I have read much first-hand evidence. How much first-hand evidence have you read? Or are you limited to 3rd and 4th hand slander?
Askjo said "Why did it NOT add others? HUSH?"
I still don't understand your point. What others did the link not add? What is "HUSH"?
Askjo said "February 18, 1890 refers to Westcott's belief. March 4, 1890 refers to Westcott's denial."
No, the quotes together explain better overall what he believed. Did you know Westcott, like many othordox believers today, believe Genesis 1-3 is poetical in structure, and that Westcott said, in the same paragraph as your "denial" quote, "Poetry is, I think, a thousand times more true than History"? No, I don't think you did. How can Westcott deny something he calls "truth" in the same paragraph. Obviously you have a quote that is ripped out of context.
